Cited by 101Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Activation of the Amyloid Cascade in Apolipoprotein E4 Transgenic Mice Induces Lysosomal Activation and Neurodegeneration Resulting in Marked Cognitive Deficits

Open access

Abstract

The allele E4 of apolipoprotein E (apoE4), the most prevalent genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, is associated histopathologically with elevated levels of brain amyloid. This led to the suggestion that the pathological effects of apoE4 are mediated by cross-talk interactions with amyloid β peptide (Aβ), which accentuate the pathological effects of the amyloid cascade. The mechanisms underlying the Aβ-mediated pathological effects of apoE4 are unknown. We have shown recently that inhibition of the Aβ-degrading enzyme neprilysin in brains of wild-type apoE3 and apoE4 mice results in rapid and similar elevations in their total brain Aβ levels. However, the nucleation and aggregation of Aβ in these mice were markedly affected by the apoE genotype and were specifically enhanced in the apoE4 mice. We presently used the neprilysin inhibition paradigm to analyze the neuropathological and cognitive effects that are induced by apoE4 after activation of the amyloid cascade. This revealed that apoE4 stimulates isoform specifically the degeneration of hippocampal CA1 neurons and of entorhinal and septal neurons, which is accompanied by the accumulation of intracellular Aβ and apoE and with lysosomal activation. Furthermore, these neuropathological effects are associated isoform specifically with the occurrence of pronounced cognitive deficits in the ApoE4 mice. These findings provide the first in vivo evidence regarding the cellular mechanisms underlying the pathological cross talk between apoE4 and Aβ, as well as a novel model system of neurodegeneration in vivo that is uniquely suitable for studying the early stages of the amyloid cascade and the effects thereon of apoE4.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5633-07.2008

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Geula C Mesulam MM (1999) in Alzheimer disease, Cholinergic system in Alzheimer disease, eds Terry RD Katzman R Bick KL Sisodia SS (Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, Philadelphia), Ed 2, p 457.
  2. Hof PR Morrison JH (1999) in Alzheimer Disease, The cellular basis of cortical disconnection in Alzheimer disease and related dementing conditions, eds Terry RD Katzman R Bick KL Sisodia SS (Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins, Philadelphia), Ed 2, p 457.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Belinson, H., Lev, D., Masliah, E., & Michaelson, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-04-30
Volume
28
Issue
18
Pages
4690-4701
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2085235587
Cited by
101
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AG‐022074, AG10435)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG010435, AG022074, P01AG022074, AG48440, AG10435)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
APOE ε4, amyloid hypothesis, amyloid-beta, neprilysin inhibition, lysosomal activation, neurodegeneration, cognitive impairment, CA1 pyramidal neurons, entorhinal cortex, septal neurons, amyloid-beta aggregation, Alzheimer's disease, transgenic mice
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cognition Disorders, Disease Models, Animal, Exploratory Behavior, Hippocampus, Learning, Lysosomes, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Neuropsychological Tests, Synapses, Water Deprivation, Neprilysin, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Drug Delivery Systems, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Mice, Apolipoprotein E3, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review