The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dopamine, Time, and Impulsivity in Humans
Open accessAbstract
Disordered dopamine neurotransmission is implicated in mediating impulsiveness across a range of behaviors and disorders including addiction, compulsive gambling, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and dopamine dysregulation syndrome. Whereas existing theories of dopamine function highlight mechanisms based on aberrant reward learning or behavioral disinhibition, they do not offer an adequate account of the pathological hypersensitivity to temporal delay that forms a crucial behavioral phenotype seen in these disorders. Here we provide evidence that a role for dopamine in controlling the relationship between the timing of future rewards and their subjective value can bridge this explanatory gap. Using an intertemporal choice task, we demonstrate that pharmacologically enhancing dopamine activity increases impulsivity by enhancing the diminutive influence of increasing delay on reward value (temporal discounting) and its corresponding neural representation in the striatum. This leads to a state of excessive discounting of temporally distant, relative to sooner, rewards. Thus our findings reveal a novel mechanism by which dopamine influences human decision-making that can account for behavioral aberrations associated with a hyperfunctioning dopamine system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, delay discounting seems to depend on the function of the ventral striatum (104) and of the PFC, including OFC (105) and its connections to the NAc (106), and is sensitive to DA manipulations (107).”
From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [107]
In the citing paper
“Delay discounting seems to depend on the function of ventral striatum (Gregorios-Pippas et al 2009) and of the PFC, including OFC (Bjork et al 2009), and is sensitive to DA manipulations (Pine et al 2010).”
From Food and Drug Reward: Overlapping Circuits in Human Obesity and Addiction (2011) · cites this paper as Pine et al 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100907 · Cited by 3,089 · cited 3×
“These results show that the characteristic decrease in activity of these regions as rewards become more delayed (or increase as they become temporally closer) (McClure et al., 2004; Tanaka et al., 2004; Kable and Glimcher, 2007; Pine et al., 2009) (see also supplemental Results for placebo, available at www.”
Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.
Ainslie, G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076860 · Cited by 2,708 · cited 1×
“However, temporal (or choice) impulsivity— the preference for smaller–sooner over larger–later rewards, due to excessive discounting of future rewards (Ainslie, 1975; Evenden, 1999; Ho et al., 1999; Cardinal et al., 2004)—is much harder to account for in terms of learning, although it remains an…”
The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience
Berridge, K. C. (2007) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0578-x · Cited by 2,347
Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex
Cardinal, R. N., Parkinson, J. A., Hall, J., & Everitt, B. J. (2002) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(02)00007-6 · Cited by 2,129
Evenden, J. L. (1999) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/pl00005481 · Cited by 2,044 · cited 7×
“This indicates that, unlike the choice outcome, dopamine manipulation did not influence the amount of time given to weigh a decision, or ability to “hold your horses,” and corroborates the suggestion that impulsivity is not a unitary construct (Evenden, 1999; Ho et al., 1999; Winstanley et al., 2004a; Dalley et al., 2…”
InfluentialThe use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings
BOND, A., & LADER, M. (1974) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1974.tb02285.x · Cited by 1,972 · cited 2×
“Subjective effects were analyzed by comparing changes in the three factors identified by Bond and Lader (1974), namely, alertness, contentedness, and calmness, relative to the change in scores observed in the placebo condition.”
The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice
Kable, J. W., & Glimcher, P. W. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2007 · Cited by 1,916 · cited 4×
“…activity of these regions as rewards become more delayed (or increase as they become temporally closer) (McClure et al., 2004; Tanaka et al., 2004; Kable and Glimcher, 2007; Pine et al., 2009) (see also supplemental Results for placebo, available at www.jneurosci.org as supplemental material) is…”
InfluentialAn adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement.
Commons, M. L., Mazur, J., Nevin, J. A., & Rachlin, H. C. (1987) · doi:10.4324/9781315825502-11 · Cited by 1,842 · cited 5×
“D can be thought of as the discount factor—the delay-dependent factor (between 0 and 1) by which the utility is discounted in a standard hyperbolic fashion (Mazur, 1987).”
InfluentialThe incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues
Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0093 · Cited by 1,717 · cited 2×
“…syndrome, addiction, and ADHD, all of which are associated with hyperdopaminergic states caused by striatal dopamine flooding or sensitization (Solanto, 1998, 2002; Seeman and Madras, 2002; Berridge, 2007; Robinson and Berridge, 2008; Dagher and Robbins, 2009; O’Sullivan et al., 2009).”
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sagvolden T Sergeant JA Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder—from brain dysfunctions to behaviour Behav Brain Res 1998 94 1 10 9708834
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reward, dopamine and the control of food intake: implications for obesity
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., & Baler, R. D. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.001 · Cited by 1,400
“located) [90,91] and of the PFC, including OFC [92], and is sensitive to DA manipulations [93].”
Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure
Heatherton, T. F., & Wagner, D. D. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.005 · Cited by 1,033
Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. ‐., Tomasi, D., & Baler, R. D. (2013) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2012.01031.x · Cited by 800
“Interestingly, delay discounting seems to depend on the function of the ventral striatum (104) and of the PFC, including OFC (105) and its connections to the NAc (106), and is sensitive to DA manipulations (107).”
BackgroundInformatic parcellation of the network involved in the computation of subjective value
Clithero, J. A., & Rangel, A. (2014) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst106 · Cited by 706
The neural mechanisms of inter-temporal decision-making: understanding variability
Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.002 · Cited by 693
Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior
Ullsperger, M., Danielmeier, C., & Jocham, G. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2012 · Cited by 634
Food and Drug Reward: Overlapping Circuits in Human Obesity and Addiction
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. J., Fowler, J. S., Tomasi, D., & Baler, R. (2011) · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2011_169 · Cited by 525
“sensitive to DA manipulations (Pine et al. 2010).”
Dopamine, serotonin and impulsivity
Dalley, J. W., & Roiser, J. P. (2012) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.03.065 · Cited by 501
“Hence, these data suggest that D2/D3 receptor signalling contributes to at least some aspects of impulsivity, consistent with a report that levodopa increased in delay discounting in healthy volunteers, an effect evident in every participant (Pine et al., 2010).”
InfluentialDisentangling pleasure from incentive salience and learning signals in brain reward circuitry
Smith, K. S., Berridge, K. C., & Aldridge, J. W. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101920108 · Cited by 464
“Also, hyperbolic discounting or impulsive choice for more immediate rewards in humans is related to dopamine activation (99).”
BackgroundPathophysiological distortions in time perception and timed performance
Allman, M. J., & Meck, W. H. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr210 · Cited by 492
“It has been revealed (in ‘normal’ adults) that excess dopamine levels (by the administration of levodopa versus placebo) can selectively increase choice towards more immediate rewards, by influencing the rate of the discounting function, such that increases in delay appear to become intolerable (Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundBickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., Gatchalian, K. M., & McClure, S. M. (2012) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2689-x · Cited by 338
“Third, findings from nonhuman's delay discounting of drug reinforcers are heterogeneous; they do not suggest that drug administration, in and of itself, is sufficient to change this discounting (e.g., Harty et al. 2011; but see Pine et al. 2010).”
BackgroundDissecting impulsivity and its relationships to drug addictions
Jentsch, J. D., Ashenhurst, J. R., Cervantes, M. C., Groman, S. M., James, A. S., & Pennington, Z. T. (2014) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12388 · Cited by 281
Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making and Subjective Well-Being
Rutledge, R. B., Skandali, N., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0702-15.2015 · Cited by 217
“A second framework involves dopamine’s more immediate effects on behavior (Frank et al., 2004; Niv et al., 2007; Robbins and Everitt, 2007; Salamone et al., 2007; Lex and Hauber, 2008; Palmiter, 2008; Sharot et al., 2009; Pine et al., 2010; Jocham et al., 2011; Guitart-Masip et al., 2012; Shiner et al., 2012; Norbury…”
BackgroundSelf-citationHauser, T. U., Iannaccone, R., Walitza, S., Brandeis, D., & Brem, S. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.018 · Cited by 203
“For the fMRI analysis,we estimated one single set of canonicalmodel parameters (αc+, αc−, αu+, αu−, τ) for all participants, similarly as in previous studies (e.g., Pine et al., 2010; Seymour et al., 2012; Voon et al., 2010).”
ResultWinstanley, C. A. (2011) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01323.x · Cited by 231
“Furthermore, administration of the DA precursor L-DOPA increases impulsive choice (Pine et al., 2010) in human volunteers, but does not affect SST or go/no-go performance (Overtoom et al., 2003; Hershey et al., 2004).”
BackgroundFeedback Timing Modulates Brain Systems for Learning in Humans
Foerde, K., & Shohamy, D. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2701-11.2011 · Cited by 198
“, 2010), converging evidence indicates that representations in the ventral striatum are modulated by whether outcomes are immediate versus delayed, and it has been shown repeatedly that the ventral striatum exhibits greater responses to the choice of sooner versus later outcomes (McClure et al., 2004; Kable and Glimch…”
BackgroundA dual‐systems perspective on addiction: contributions from neuroimaging and cognitive training
McClure, S. M., & Bickel, W. K. (2014) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12561 · Cited by 209
Can delay discounting deliver on the promise of RDoC?
Lempert, K. M., STEINGLASS, J. E., Pinto, A., Kable, J. W., & Simpson, H. B. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718001770 · Cited by 193
“Dopaminergic medications can increase impulsivity in humans (Pine et al., 2010) and rodents (Logue et al.”
BackgroundResultvan den Bos, W., Rodriguez, C. A., Schweitzer, J. B., & McClure, S. M. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4105-13.2014 · Cited by 178
“Previous imaging studies have shown that amygdala activation was associated with individual differences in discounting, such that increased amygdala activity predicted more impulsive behavior (Hoffman et al., 2008; Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundAddiction science: Uncovering neurobiological complexity
Volkow, N. D., & Baler, R. (2013) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.05.007 · Cited by 205
“Not surprisingly, delay discounting seems to depend on the function of the NAc (Gregorios-Pippas et al., 2009) and the PFC, including lateral OFC (Bjork et al., 2009), and is sensitive to DA manipulations (Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundTOWARDS A GENERAL MODEL OF TEMPORAL DISCOUNTING
van den Bos, W., & McClure, S. M. (2013) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.6 · Cited by 149
“Figure 2B demonstrates the effect of systemic dopamine agonists on discounting, adapted from Pine et al. (2010).”
InfluentialSeparate mesocortical and mesolimbic pathways encode effort and reward learning signals
Hauser, T. U., Eldar, E., & Dolan, R. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1705643114 · Cited by 142
Self-citationEagle, D. M., Wong, J. C. K., Allan, M. E., Mar, A. C., Theobald, D. E., & Robbins, T. W. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6182-10.2011 · Cited by 145
“These deficits arise from dysregulation within frontal/basal ganglia circuitry that is often linked with dopamine dysfunction (Volkow et al., 2009; Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundThe dopaminergic reward system underpins gender differences in social preferences
Soutschek, A., Burke, C. J., Beharelle, A. R., Schreiber, R., Weber, S. C., Karipidis, I. I., Velden, J. T., Weber, B., Haker, H., Kalenscher, T., et al. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0226-y · Cited by 141
The costs and benefits of brain dopamine for cognitive control
Cools, R. (2016) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1401 · Cited by 164
Dopaminergic modulation of the exploration/exploitation trade-off in human decision-making
Chakroun, K., Mathar, D., Wiehler, A., Ganzer, F., & Peters, J. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.51260 · Cited by 131
Dopamine ups and downs in vulnerability to addictions: a neurodevelopmental model
Leyton, M., & Vezina, P. (2014) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2014.04.002 · Cited by 127
“Elevated dopamine function, in comparison, increases the ability of reward related cues to guide behavioral choices [65], diminishes the ability to differentiate between high and low value rewards [71], and induces steeper temporal discounting, a form of impulsivity defined by preference for immediately available smal…”
BackgroundMacDonald, P. A., & Monchi, O. (2011) · Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.4061/2011/572743 · Cited by 134
“In PD patients, administration of L-dopa correlated with greater attenuation of the dorsal striatum, insula, subgenual cingulate, and lateral orbitofrontal cortices for delayed relative to more immediate rewards, paralleling the behavioural result of increased impulsivity and temporal discounting relative to placebo […”
BackgroundResultSeparate and overlapping brain areas encode subjective value during delay and effort discounting
Massar, S. A. A., Libedinsky, C., Weiyan, C., Huettel, S. A., & Chee, M. W. L. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.080 · Cited by 123
MacDonald, P. A., MacDonald, A. A., Seergobin, K. N., Tamjeedi, R., Ganjavi, H., Provost, J.-S., & Monchi, O. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr075 · Cited by 133
“…134; 1447–1463 P. A. MacDonald et al. D ow nloaded from https://academ ic.oup.com /brain/article-abstract/134/5/1447/286814 by U niversity of W estern O ntario user on 05 D ecem ber 2019 discounting) are combined to enact decisions (Pine et al., 2009, 2010; Ding and Gold, 2010; Cai et al., 2011).”
BackgroundBehavioural and physiological correlates of impulsivity in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris)
Wright, H. F., Mills, D. S., & Pollux, P. M. J. (2011) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.019 · Cited by 137
“The dopaminergic system is also suggested to play a role in impulsivity and delay of gratification [24],[39],[40], and some evidence suggests a potential role of”
de Manzano, Ö., Červenka, S., Jučaitė, A., Hellenäs, O., Farde, L., & Ullén, F. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.072 · Cited by 129
“After correction for attenuation, random and scatter events, images were reconstructed using a Hanning filter of 2.0 mm into a volume of 47 slices, with a center-to-center distance of 3.125 mm and a pixel size of 2.02 mm×2.02 mm.”
MethodInfluentialMacKillop, J. (2012) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.4 · Cited by 120
Can the neuroeconomics revolution revolutionize psychiatry?
Hasler, G. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.04.011 · Cited by 122
Cho, S. S., Koshimori, Y., Aminian, K., Obeso, I., Rusjan, P., Lang, A. E., Daskalakis, Z. J., Houle, S., & Strafella, A. P. (2015) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2014.211 · Cited by 112
“…incorporated into the construction of its ultimate value, suggesting a mechanism through which DA may influence human choice and temporal discounting, and traits such as impulsiveness that may account for several behavioral disorders associated with a hyperfunctioning DA system (Pine et al, 2010).”
BackgroundSleep Deprivation Alters Effort Discounting but not Delay Discounting of Monetary Rewards
Libedinsky, C., Massar, S. A. A., Ling, A., Chee, W., Huettel, S. A., & Chee, M. W. L. (2013) · SLEEP · doi:10.5665/sleep.2720 · Cited by 108
Clewett, D., LUO, S. H., Hsu, E., Ainslie, G. W., Mather, M., & Monterosso, J. R. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22436 · Cited by 106
“Alternatively, they may discount modestly, but exhibit steep diminishing marginal utility (Ho et al., 1999; Pine et al., 2009, 2010).”
BackgroundMcClelland, J., Dalton, B., Kekic, M., Bartholdy, S., Campbell, I. C., & Schmidt, U. H. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.024 · Cited by 119
Luoto, S., Krams, I. A., & Rantala, M. J. (2018) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-018-1261-0 · Cited by 105
The biological effects of acute psychosocial stress on delay discounting
Kimura, K., Izawa, S., Sugaya, N., Ogawa, N., Yamada, K. C., Shirotsuki, K., Mikami, I., Hirata, K., Nagano, Y., & Hasegawa, T. (2013) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.04.019 · Cited by 108
Yildirim, B. O., & Derksen, J. J. L. (2015) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.001 · Cited by 124
Kiddle, B., Inkster, B., Prabhu, G., Moutoussis, M., Whitaker, K. J., Bullmore, E. T., Dolan, R. J., Fonagy, P., Goodyer, I. M., & Jones, P. B. (2017) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyx117 · Cited by 87
Self-citationCognitive and behavioral training interventions to promote self-control.
Smith, T. R., Panfil, K., Bailey, C., & Kirkpatrick, K. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xan0000208 · Cited by 104
Ovarian Cycle Effects on Immediate Reward Selection Bias in Humans: A Role for Estradiol
Smith, C. T., Sierra, Y., Oppler, S. H., & Boettiger, C. A. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0014-14.2014 · Cited by 93
“Second, human pharmacology studies suggest that DA modulates Now bias, albeit with inconsistent results (de Wit et al., 2002; Acheson and de Wit, 2008; Hamidovic et al., 2008; de Wit, 2009; Pine et al., 2010), although these studies have not accounted for intrinsic variations in DA signaling that could interact with p…”
BackgroundResultDopamine and the motivation of cognitive control
Cools, R., Froböse, M. I., Aarts, E., & Hofmans, L. (2019) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804281-6.00007-0 · Cited by 99
Dopamine neurons learn to encode the long-term value of multiple future rewards
Enomoto, K., Matsumoto, N., Nakai, S., Satoh, T., Sato, T. K., Ueda, Y., Inokawa, H., Haruno, M., & Kimura, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014457108 · Cited by 83
Dopaminergic function and intertemporal choice
Joutsa, J., Voon, V., Johansson, J. J., Niemelä, S., Bergman, J. R., & Kaasinen, V. (2015) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2014.133 · Cited by 83
Weber, S. C., Beck‐Schimmer, B., Kajdi, M.-E., Müller, D., Tobler, P. N., & Quednow, B. B. (2016) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2016.113 · Cited by 76
Striatal structure and function predict individual biases in learning to avoid pain
Eldar, E., Hauser, T. U., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1519829113 · Cited by 79
Self-citationTschernegg, M., Pletzer, B. A., Schwartenbeck, P., Ludersdorfer, P., Hoffmann, U., & Kronbichler, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00384 · Cited by 79
“Both models rely on a softmax function for producing choice probabilities based on the values of the options including an inverse temperature (beta) parameter that determines the stochasticity of choice (see Pine et al., 2009, 2010 for details).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPure hyperbolic discount curves predict “eyes open” self-control
Ainslie, G. (2011) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-011-9272-5
“Evidence that some brain valuation sites do not respond to delayed rewards has been contradicted by research showing that all valuation sites respond to delayed prospects and discount them at the same rate (Kable and Glimcher 2007; Pine et al. 2010 ).”
ResultDong, M.-X., Chen, G.-H., & Hu, L. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.608520 · Cited by 73
Puberty, Developmental Processes, and Health Interventions
Viner, R., Allen, N. B., & Patton, G. C. (2017) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0423-6_ch9 · Cited by 83
Dopamine Increases a Value-Independent Gambling Propensity
Rigoli, F., Rutledge, R. B., Chew, B., Ousdal, O. T., Dayan, P., & Dolan, R. J. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2016.68 · Cited by 63
“…broader range of functions (Berridge, 2007; Zhang et al , 2009) that are subject of much recent work (Palmiter, 2008; Rigoli et al , 2016a; Sharot, et al , 2009a; Pine et al , 2010; Jocham et al , 2011; Guitart-Masip et al , 2012; Shiner et al , 2012; Wunderlich et al , 2012; Norbury et al , 2013).”
Self-citationOn the functional form of temporal discounting: An optimized adaptive test
Cavagnaro, D. R., Aranovich, G. J., McClure, S. M., Pitt, M. A., & Myung, J. I. (2016) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-016-9242-y · Cited by 63
“More recently, maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) has become a popular alternative to analyses based on indifference points (McClure et al. 2004; McClure et al. 2007; Pine et al. 2009; Pine et al. 2010).”
Pathological gambling in Parkinson's disease: Subthalamic oscillations during economics decisions
Rosa, M., Fumagalli, M., Giannicola, G., Marceglia, S. R. F., Lucchiari, C., Servello, D., Franzini, A., Pacchetti, C., Romito, L. M., Albanese, A., et al. (2013) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.25427 · Cited by 66
Moderators of the association between brain activation and farsighted choice
LUO, S. H., Ainslie, G. W., Pollini, D., Giragosian, L., & Monterosso, J. R. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.004 · Cited by 65
“Alternatively, he may discount modestly, but exhibits steep diminishing marginal utility such that the utility of the larger amount is only slightly larger than that of the smaller (Ho et al., 1999; Pine et al., 2009; Pine et al., 2010).”
Park, B., Kebets, V., Larivière, S., Hettwer, M. D., Paquola, C., van Rooij, D., Buitelaar, J. K., Franke, B., Hoogman, M., Schmaal, L., et al. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03963-z · Cited by 65
Luoto, S. (2018) · Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology · doi:10.1007/s40750-018-0103-6 · Cited by 60
Peters, J., Miedl, S. F., & Büchel, C. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047225 · Cited by 59
“This choice function is frequently applied in computational modelling of reinforcement learning [60,61] and decisionmaking, including delay discounting [34,41,50,51,62,63] to convert value differences between decision options into choice probabilities.”
MethodAge modulates the effect of COMT genotype on delay discounting behavior
Smith, C. T., & Boettiger, C. A. (2012) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2653-9 · Cited by 59
“A variety of evidence links delay-discounting to dopamine (DA) and DA-modulated frontostriatal circuits (Adriani et al. 2009; Altamirano et al. 2011; Boettiger et al. 2007; Doya 2008; Kobayashi and Schultz 2008; Lee et al. 2009; Mitchell et al. 2007; Paloyelis et al. 2010; Pine et al. 2010).”
BackgroundThe dopamine augmenter L-DOPA does not affect positive mood in healthy human volunteers.
Liggins, J., Pihl, R. O., Benkelfat, C., & Leyton, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028370 · Cited by 58
“However, this seems unlikely since similar doses of L-DOPA given to healthy human volunteers induce behavioural effects [77– 79] and increase striatal DA synthesis [80].”
BackgroundCherniawsky, A. S., & Holroyd, C. B. (2012) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-012-0122-x · Cited by 60
Cadoni, C., Simola, N., Espa, E., Fenu, S., & Chiara, G. D. (2013) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.12085 · Cited by 57
“…to THC may elicit persistent modifications in impulsivity is particularly interesting, in view of the proposed role of impulsivity in drug addiction and of the possible involvement of NAc shell DA in impulsivity (Basar et al. 2010; Besson et al. 2010; Pine et al. 2010; Sesia et al. 2010).”
BackgroundNeural Mechanisms of Gain–Loss Asymmetry in Temporal Discounting
Tanaka, S., Yamada, K., Yoneda, H., & Ohtake, F. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5169-12.2014 · Cited by 53
“, 2009) and a correlation between striatal BOLD signals and the hyperbolic discount functions (Pine et al., 2009; Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe cost of dopamine for dynamic cognitive control
Cools, R. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.05.007 · Cited by 79
“…of levodopa to healthy volunteers indeed increased impulsive choice of a small, immediate reward over a large, delayed reward by enhancing the diminishing influence of increasing delay on reward value (temporal discounting) and its corresponding neural re-presentation in the striatum [58].”
Malmberg, M., Kleinjan, M., Overbeek, G. J., Vermulst, A. A., Lammers, J., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2013) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.08.003 · Cited by 60
Webber, H. E., Lopez-Gamundi, P., Stamatovich, S. N., de Wit, H., & Wardle, M. C. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.004 · Cited by 51
“Finally, a single study found effects opposite to our hypothesis -- increased delay discounting when augmenting DA using L-DOPA (150mg) (Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialInsulin, Central Dopamine D2 Receptors, and Monetary Reward Discounting in Obesity
Eisenstein, S. A., Gredysa, D. M., Antenor‐Dorsey, J. A. V., Green, L., Arbeláez, A. M., Koller, J. M., BLACK, K. J., Perlmutter, J. S., Moerlein, S. M., & Hershey, T. G. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133621 · Cited by 59
“Administration of the DA precursor L-dopa increases delayed reward discounting in healthy individuals [65].”
BackgroundStriatal hyposensitivity to delayed rewards among cigarette smokers
Luo, S., Ainslie, G., Giragosian, L., & Monterosso, J. R. (2011) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.11.012 · Cited by 52
Drug addiction: An affective-cognitive disorder in need of a cure
Fattore, L., & Diana, M. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.04.006 · Cited by 58
The role of the dorsal striatum in choice impulsivity
Kim, B. S., & Im, H. (2018) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13961 · Cited by 62
Schüller, C. B., Kuhn, J., Jessen, F., & Hu, X. (2019) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2018.1557675 · Cited by 52
“2010 (95) 14 (6) Discounted utility 9 × Sasse et al.”
Neurogenetics and Epigenetics in Impulsive Behaviour: Impact on Reward Circuitry
Archer, T., & Blum, K. (2012) · Journal of Genetic Syndromes & Gene Therapy · doi:10.4172/2157-7412.1000115 · Cited by 54
The role of dopamine in dynamic effort-reward integration
Michely, J., Viswanathan, S., Hauser, T. U., Delker, L., Dolan, R. J., & Grefkes, C. (2020) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-020-0669-0 · Cited by 55
Self-citationDâ€TMAmour-Horvat, V., & Leyton, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00432 · Cited by 54
“However, the same dose of haloperidol did not affect performance on a slot machine game (Zack and Poulos, 2007), nor did a smaller dose (1.5 mg/kg, p.o.) affect rates of delay discounting in healthy adults (Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialImpulsivity and Parkinson's disease: More than just disinhibition
Antonelli, F., Ray, N. J., & Strafella, A. P. (2011) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2011.06.006 · Cited by 55
“Moreover, some data revealed a specific role for dopamine in controlling the relationship between the timing of future rewards and their subjective value [78].”
BackgroundA developmental perspective on neuroeconomic mechanisms of contingency management.
Stanger, C., Budney, A. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2013) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/a0028748 · Cited by 50
Dopamine Modulates Striato-Frontal Functioning during Temporal Processing
Jones, C. R. G., & Jahanshahi, M. (2011) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2011.00070 · Cited by 48
“Related to this, administration of dopamine antagonists to healthy participants increases the degree of temporal discounting, i.e., the relative value of delayed rewards decreases, leading to impulsive behavior (Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundBernácer, J., Martínez-Valbuena, I., Martı́nez, M., Pujol, N., Luís, E. O., Ramírez-Castillo, D., & Pastor, M. A. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116181 · Cited by 49
Wagner, B., Clos, M., Sommer, T., & Peters, J. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0592-20.2020 · Cited by 44
Averbeck, B. B., Djamshidian, A., O’Sullivan, S. S., Housden, C. R., Roiser, J. P., & Lees, A. J. (2013) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/a0032079 · Cited by 48
Noda, Y., Barr, M. S., ElSalhy, M., Masuda, F., Tarumi, R., Ogyu, K., Wada, M., Tsugawa, S., Miyazaki, T., Nakajima, S., et al. (2019) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109822 · Cited by 47
Starving honeybees lose self-control
Mayack, C., & Naug, D. (2015) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0820 · Cited by 45
Voon, V., & Dalley, J. W. (2015) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2015_5013 · Cited by 46
“Levodopa, a precursor to DA in healthy humans, increases impulsive choice (Pine et al. 2010) and increases delay aversion in patients with PD (Cools et al.”
BackgroundSweitzer, M. M., Donny, E. C., & Hariri, A. R. (2012) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.01.017 · Cited by 46
“…recent study demonstrated that administration of L-Dopa to healthy volunteers engaged in an inter-temporal choice task enhanced VS BOLD activation to immediate rewards but attenuated VS BOLD activation to delayed rewards—an effect paralleled by an increase in delay discounting (Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundSmith, C. T., Wallace, D. L., Dang, L. C., Aarts, E., Jagust, W. J., D’Esposito, M., & Boettiger, C. A. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00261.2015 · Cited by 48
“2010) and by pharmacological manipulations that heavily modulate subcortical DA in humans (Acheson and de Wit 2008; de Wit 2009; de Wit et al. 2002; Hamidovic et al. 2008; Pine et al. 2010).”
BackgroundCognitive control and the dopamine D2-like receptor: a dimensional understanding of addiction
Groman, S. M., & Jentsch, J. D. (2011) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20897 · Cited by 43
“[149] Furthermore, administration of the DA precursor L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) can induce impulsive responding in healthy subjects[150] and in Parkinson’s disease patients.”
BackgroundMartini, A., Lago, D. D., Edelstyn, N. M. J., Salgarello, M., Lugoboni, F., & Tamburin, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.01018 · Cited by 43
“However, other dopaminergic agents such as levodopa and pramipexole increase impulsivity on delay discounting and gambling tasks (24, 25).”
BackgroundImpulsivity is related to striatal dopamine transporter availability in healthy males
Costa, A. C. L., la Fougère, C. J., Pogarell, O. M., Möller, H., Riedel, M. J., & Ettinger, U. (2012) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.07.011 · Cited by 41
“Striatal dopamine is crucial for inhibitory control, updating working memory and decision-making processes (Cools et al., 2007; Hershey et al., 2004; Mehta et al., 2005; Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundBaseline impulsivity may moderate L-DOPA effects on value-based decision-making
Petzold, J., Kienast, A., Lee, Y., Pooseh, S., London, E. D., Goschke, T., & Smolka, M. N. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42124-x · Cited by 35
Anandakumar, J., Mills, K. L., Earl, E., Irwin, L., Miranda-Domínguez, Ó., Demeter, D. V., Walton-Weston, A., Karalunas, S. L., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2018) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2018.07.003 · Cited by 37
“Multiple studies have shown that areas of the brain with dopaminergic innervation are involved in temporal discounting preference (Kobayashi and Schultz, 2008; Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundThe role of oxytocin in delay of gratification and flexibility in non-social decision making
Kapetaniou, G. E., Reinhard, M. A., Christian, P., Jobst, A., Tobler, P. N., Padberg, F., & Soutschek, A. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.61844 · Cited by 34
“We speculate that oxytocin might have reduced impulsiveness via interactions with the dopaminergic system as delay of gratification has been related to dopaminergic activity (Pine et al., 2010; Weber et al., 2016), whereby blocking dopaminergic neurotransmission increases delay of gratification similar to our current…”
ResultFassbender, C., Houde, S., Silver-Balbus, S., Ballard, K., Kim, B., Rutledge, K. J., Dixon, J. F., Iosif, A., Schweitzer, J. B., & McClure, S. M. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00642 · Cited by 37
Effect of Levodopa on Reward and Impulsivity in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease
Carvalho, M. M., Campos, F. L., Marques, M., Soares‐Cunha, C., Kokras, N., Dalla, C., Leite‐Almeida, H., Sousa, N., & Salgado, A. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00145 · Cited by 39
“…that the effects of dopaminergic stimulation with pramipexole can significantly increase impulsive responding in non-lesioned rats (Madden et al., 2010; Johnson et al., 2011; Rokosik and Napier, 2012; Engeln et al., 2016), and that LD can increase impulsivity in healthy humans (Pine et al., 2010).”
BackgroundToward a Unifying Account of Dopamine’s Role in Cost-Benefit Decision Making
Soutschek, A., Jetter, A., & Tobler, P. N. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2022.02.010 · Cited by 33
“Often, the predictions of different accounts are even in apparent conflict with each other: for example, while some accounts claim that dopamine increases the tolerance for delay costs (8,9), others posit that dopamine enhances the preference for immediate rewards (10,11).”
BackgroundThe Role of Dopamine in Motor Flexibility
Bestmann, S., Ruge, D., Rothwell, J. C., & Galea, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00706 · Cited by 34
A Computational Analysis of Aberrant Delay Discounting in Psychiatric Disorders
Story, G. W., Moutoussis, M., & Dolan, R. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01948 · Cited by 35
“Commensurate with this hypothesis, systemic administration in humans of the dopamine precursor l-Dopa increases discount rates (Pine et al., 2010), although potentially countervailing evidence is that decreasing dopamine transmission in rats by administration of haloperidol (Denk et al., 2005) or…”
BackgroundSelf-citationDopamine regulates decision thresholds in human reinforcement learning in males
Chakroun, K., Wiehler, A., Wagner, B., Mathar, D., Ganzer, F., van Eimeren, T., Sommer, T., & Peters, J. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41130-y · Cited by 36
Sgambato, V., & Tremblay, L. (2017) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-017-1693-z · Cited by 37
“…been linked to changes in striatal activity and to increases in impulsive-compulsive behavior and risk-taking choices (St Onge and Floresco 2009; Pine et al. 2010; O’Sullivan et al. 2011; Fineberg et al. 2010), suggesting more specific involvement of dopamine in appetitive reward value and in…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Pine, A., Shiner, T., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-06-30
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 8888-8896
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3059485
- OpenAlex
- W2046808635
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 11.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (078865)
- Medical Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-538-28-1001)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- dopamine, impulsivity, delay discounting, intertemporal choice, reward value, striatum, decision-making, dopamine dysregulation syndrome, addiction, gambling addiction, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, behavioral disinhibition, reward learning
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Corpus Striatum, Decision Making, Dopamine, Female, Haloperidol, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Levodopa, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, Time Factors, Dopamine Agents, Dopamine Antagonists, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review