Cited by 58Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The dopamine augmenter L-DOPA does not affect positive mood in healthy human volunteers.

Open access
Liggins, John, Pihl, Robert O., Benkelfat, Chawki, Leyton, Marco·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Dopamine neurotransmission influences approach toward rewards and reward-related cues. The best cited interpretation of this effect proposes that dopamine mediates the pleasure that commonly accompanies reward. This hypothesis has received support in some animal models and a few studies in humans. However, direct assessments of the effect of transiently increasing dopamine neurotransmission have been largely limited to the use of psychostimulant drugs, which elevate brain levels of multiple neurotransmitters in addition to dopamine. In the present study we tested the effect of more selectively elevating dopamine neurotransmission, as produced by administration of the immediate dopamine precursor, L-DOPA (0, 100/25, 200/50 mg, Sinemet), in healthy human volunteers. Neither dose altered positive mood. The results suggest that dopamine neurotransmission does not directly influence positive mood in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0028370

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increases of human dopamine do not reliably cause enhancement of subjective ratings of pleasure.

    “Similarly, it is now increasingly clear that increases of human dopamine do not reliably cause enhancement of subjective ratings of pleasure (although many rewards do induce dopamine release as a consequence and correlate, but not the cause, of pleasure) (Leyton et al., 2002; Evans et al., 2006; Liggins et al., 2012).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Liggins et al., 2012

  • Many rewards induce dopamine release as a consequence and correlate, but not the cause, of pleasure.

    “Similarly, it is now increasingly clear that increases of human dopamine do not reliably cause enhancement of subjective ratings of pleasure (although many rewards do induce dopamine release as a consequence and correlate, but not the cause, of pleasure) (Leyton et al., 2002; Evans et al., 2006; Liggins et al., 2012).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Liggins et al., 2012

  • Giving ordinary people L-DOPA, which produces surges in brain dopamine levels, does not increase their subjective ratings of pleasure feelings.

    “For example, giving ordinary people the medication L-DOPA, which produces surges in brain dopamine levels, does not increase their subjective ratings of pleasure feelings (Liggins et al., 2012).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Liggins et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [66]Berridge KC 2007 The debate over dopamine's role in reward: The case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology 191 391 431 17072591

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liggins, J., Pihl, R. O., Benkelfat, C., & Leyton, M.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Leyton, Marco
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-01-04
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
e28370
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074050833
Cited by
58
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • McGill University
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (36429, MOP–36429)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
L-DOPA, dopamine signaling, positive mood, reward, pleasure, psychostimulants, dopamine precursor, levodopa/carbidopa, human volunteers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Dopamine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Health, Humans, Human Experimentation, Levodopa, Male, Synaptic Transmission, Up-Regulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review