Cited by 389Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Self‐organized developmental patterning and differentiation in cerebral organoids

Open access
Renner, Magdalena, Lancaster, Madeline A, Bian, Shan, Choi, Heejin, Ku, Taeyun, Peer, Angela, Chung, Kwanghun, Knoblich, Juergen A·2017·The EMBO Journal

Abstract

Cerebral organoids recapitulate human brain development at a considerable level of detail, even in the absence of externally added signaling factors. The patterning events driving this self-organization are currently unknown. Here, we examine the developmental and differentiative capacity of cerebral organoids. Focusing on forebrain regions, we demonstrate the presence of a variety of discrete ventral and dorsal regions. Clearing and subsequent 3D reconstruction of entire organoids reveal that many of these regions are interconnected, suggesting that the entire range of dorso-ventral identities can be generated within continuous neuroepithelia. Consistent with this, we demonstrate the presence of forebrain organizing centers that express secreted growth factors, which may be involved in dorso-ventral patterning within organoids. Furthermore, we demonstrate the timed generation of neurons with mature morphologies, as well as the subsequent generation of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Our work provides the methodology and quality criteria for phenotypic analysis of brain organoids and shows that the spatial and temporal patterning events governing human brain development can be recapitulated in vitro.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15252/embj.201694700

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that several organoids contained a cell population resembling the cortical hem.

    “Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that several organoids contained a cell population that resembled the cortical hem, an important signalling centre implicated in forebrain patterning57,58.”
  • A recent study characterized cerebral organoids by demonstrating the presence of both distinct cerebral brain regions and forebrain organizing centres.

    “A recent study characterized cerebral organoids by demonstrating the presence of both distinct cerebral brain regions and forebrain organizing centres56.”
  • The organoid tissue examined expressed signalling molecules including WNT2B and BMP6.

    “Although the presence of a cortical-hem-like region had been noted in an earlier report3, the organoid tissue examined in the later study also expressed signalling molecules, including WNT2B and BMP6.”
  • Previous studies have described the emergence of patterning centres within the neuroepithelium that coordinate to regionalize the developing organoid.

    “Previous studies have described the emergence of patterning centres within the neuroepithelium that coordinate to regionalize the developing organoid22.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renner, M., Lancaster, M. A., Bian, S., Choi, H., Ku, T., Peer, A., Chung, K., & Knoblich, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (AT)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Knoblich, Juergen A
Venue
The EMBO Journal
Published
2017-03-10
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
1316-1329
ISSN
  • 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2075
OpenAlex
W2592611994
Cited by
389
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 10
FWCI
15.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UP_1201/9)
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences
  • Austrian Science Fund (I_1281‐B19, Z_153_B09)
  • European Research Council
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • Chicago Community Trust (Searle Scholars Program)
  • David and Lucile Packard Foundation (Packard award in Science and Engineering)
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (NARSAD Young Investigator Award)
  • JPB Foundation
  • NCSOFT Cultural Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (1‐U01‐NS090473‐01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
brain organoids, self-organization, brain development, forebrain patterning, dorsoventral patterning, neuroepithelium, 3D reconstruction, secreted growth factors, neuronal differentiation, astrocyte differentiation, oligodendrocyte differentiation, human brain development
MeSH terms
Brain, Cell Differentiation, Humans, Organoids, Body Patterning, Cell Proliferation, Spatio-Temporal Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review