Cited by 291Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

Cyberbullying and children and young people’s mental health: A systematic map of systematic reviews

Open access
Kwan, Irene, Dickson, Kelly, Richardson, Michelle, MacDowall, Wendy, Burchett, Helen, Stansfield, Claire, Brunton, Ginny, Sutcliffe, Katy +1 more·2020·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

Cyberbullying is associated with considerable negative mental and psychosocial consequences in children and young people, making it a serious public health concern. To review the highest level of available evidence, a systematic mapping review was conducted to identify systematic reviews that investigated the relationship between cyberbullying and mental and psychological outcomes in young people. Topic-relevant bibliographic databases and online resources were searched to identify reviews published since 2007. Data were extracted using a coding tool developed for this study. Methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR criteria. Nineteen systematic reviews satisfied the inclusion criteria and they reported a strong negative association between cyberbullying and mental health outcomes in young people. Meta-analysis was performed in 11 reviews and narrative synthesis in 8 reviews. Data were derived from predominantly cross-sectional studies and a clear causal relationship between cyberbullying and mental outcomes cannot be established. Two-third of the included reviews were classified to be of low or unclear quality, due to the lack of quality assessment of the primary studies included in individual reviews. This systematic map consolidates available evidence at review level and confirms the existing gaps in longitudinal and qualitative evidence synthesis. Closer examination of the moderating factors influencing cyberbullying behaviors in future research can advance our understanding and inform the development of tailored programs of intervention to mitigate the negative impact of this phenomenon.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2019.0370

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has noted many negative psychological consequences associated with online victimization including post-traumatic stress, diminished self-esteem, and mental health outcomes such as anxiety, depression, suicide ideation, and self-harm.

    “Beyond the school context, research has noted many negative psychological consequences associated with online victimization including post-traumatic stress (102), diminished self-esteem (103), and mental health outcomes such as anxiety, depression, suicide ideation, self-harm (104).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [73]Burgess-Proctor A, Patchin JW, Hinduja S (2009) Cyberbullying and online harassment: Reconceptualizing the victimization of adolescent girls. In: Garcia V, Clifford J, eds. Female crime victims: reality reconsidered. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 1– 30
  2. [82]Butler D, Kift S, Campbell M Cyber bullying in schools and the law: is there an effective means of addressing the power imbalance. eLaw Journal 2009; 16: 84– 114
  3. [83]Feinberg T, Robey N Cyberbullying. The Education Digest 2009; 74: 26

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwan, I., Dickson, K., Richardson, M., MacDowall, W., Burchett, H., Stansfield, C., Brunton, G., Sutcliffe, K., & Thomas, J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Kwan, Irene
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2020-02
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
72-82
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W3002553481
Cited by
291
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 19
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (PR-R6-0113-11003)
  • Department of Health and Social Care (PR-R6-0113-11003)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, children, youth, mental health, psychological outcomes, psychosocial consequences, methodological quality of systematic reviews, moderators, bullying intervention programs
MeSH terms
Cyberbullying, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Meta-Analysis as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review