Cited by 108Stress Responses and CortisolPhysical Activity and HealthTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 45 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Can physical exercise modulate cortisol level in subjects with depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Beserra, Ana Heloisa Nascimento, Kameda, Priscila, Deslandes, Andrea Camaz, Schuch, Felipe Barreto, Laks, Jerson, Moraes, Helena Sales de·2018·Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent medical illness that is associated with chronic stress. Patients with MDD can show an imbalance in cortisol levels, which can be restored with the remission of symptoms. Physical exercise training has been used as a tool to promote changes in cortisol levels in healthy individuals. However, it is unknown if exercise can produce the same results in individuals with MDD. Objective: To review evidence of cortisol changes after exercise training in individuals with MDD. Methods: We conducted a search on PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and PsycInfo databases. Random effects meta-analysis was performed and standardized mean difference (SMD) effect size was calculated. Analyses of forest and funnel plots was conducted using Stata v.11.0 software. Results: At first, 463 studies were obtained in the search. After completion of the selection procedure, five articles with seven analyses were included. Type of exercise, frequency of training, cortisol measurement, and type of control group were analyzed. There was a reduction of cortisol levels in the exercise group (SMD = −0.65, 95%CI 1.30-0.01). Moreover, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses revealed an effect of type (aerobic exercise) and frequency (five times per week) of exercise on reduction of cortisol levels. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously due to the small number of studies and a substantial heterogeneity among them. Conclusion: Physical exercise promotes a reduction in cortisol levels in individuals with MDD. However, this finding can be influenced by type of exercise, weekly frequency, and type of cortisol measurement.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic review and meta-analysis found a moderate favorable effect of exercise training on reducing cortisol levels in individuals with major depressive disorder (SMD = -0.65; 95%CI -1.30 to 0.01), but the main pooled estimate was not statistically significant (p = 0.054). Subgroup analyses suggested larger reductions for aerobic exercise, five-times-weekly training, urine cortisol measurement, and non-active control groups, though the authors caution these findings are limited by few studies and substantial heterogeneity.

Key findings

  • The main random-effects meta-analysis of all trials showed a moderate reduction in cortisol after exercise training: SMD = -0.65 (95%CI -1.30 to 0.01; p = 0.054; I² = 82.7%).
  • After sensitivity analysis excluding two trials outside the funnel plot, the effect remained moderate and became statistically significant: SMD = -0.64 (95%CI -1.17 to -0.10; p = 0.019; I² = 28.7%).
  • Subgroup analyses found significant reductions for aerobic exercise (SMD = -0.76; 95%CI -1.55 to 0.03), five times per week (SMD = -2.18; 95%CI -2.90 to -1.47), three times per week (SMD = -0.64; 95%CI -1.17 to -0.10), urine cortisol measurement (SMD = -2.18; 95%CI -2.90 to -1.47), and non-active control groups (SMD = -0.99; 95%CI -1.95 to -0.04).
  • No significant effects were found for strength training (SMD = -0.05; 95%CI -0.57 to 0.47), exercising twice per week (SMD = 0.05; 95%CI -0.32 to 0.41), saliva cortisol (SMD = -0.88; 95%CI -2.00 to 0.30), plasma cortisol (SMD = -0.26; 95%CI -0.71 to 0.18), or active control groups (SMD = -0.05; 95%CI -0.46 to 0.35).

Methods

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018055996), conducted according to PICO and PRISMA, searching PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and PsycInfo up to March 02 2018.
  • Inclusion criteria were randomized and controlled studies investigating exercise training effects on cortisol levels in individuals with MDD compared with control groups; MDD was defined by diagnostic interviews or depression screening cut-offs.
  • The search yielded 463 studies; after selection, 5 studies with 7 arms and 209 participants (125 intervention vs. 84 control) were included. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated standardized mean differences using Stata v.11.0, with subgroup analyses by exercise type, training frequency, cortisol measurement, and control group type; risk of bias was assessed with the PEDro scale.

Limitations

  • The authors state that results should be interpreted cautiously due to the small number of studies and substantial heterogeneity among them regarding exercise type, cortisol measurement, exercise frequency, and control group type.
  • The authors state that it is not possible to conclude whether the effect of exercise on cortisol occurs concomitantly with reductions in depressive symptoms, and that the small number of articles did not allow reliable conclusions from subgroup analyses.
  • The authors also note that the meta-analysis included both patients with a clinical diagnosis of depression and individuals with depressive symptoms according to scales, so the influence of clinical diagnosis could not be determined; the text makes evident additional concerns including funnel plot asymmetry suggesting possible publication bias and discrepant exercise methodologies.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0155

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 45 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 27 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 13
26 of 26
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is unknown whether exercise training promotes the same cortisol effects in individuals with major depressive disorder as in healthy individuals.

    “However, it is still unknown whether exercise training might promote the same cortisol effects in individuals with MDD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Plasma measurement is the most invasive form of cortisol measurement compared to saliva and urine collections, and is a stressful procedure.

    “Plasma measurement is a widely used method, however it is the most invasive form when compared to saliva and urine collections (i.e., a stressful procedure).”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Aerobic exercise is called significant despite a nonsignificant result

    Major

    The text calls the aerobic-training reduction significant, but Table 2 reports p = 0.059 and a 95% confidence interval that includes zero.

  • Saliva confidence interval differs between text and table

    Minor

    The saliva subgroup's lower confidence bound is -2.06 in the prose but -2.00 in Table 2.

  • Plasma confidence interval has conflicting upper bounds

    Minor

    The prose gives the upper bound as -0.18, while Table 2 gives it as 0.18. The difference changes whether the interval includes zero.

  • No-treatment confidence interval has conflicting upper bounds

    Minor

    The prose reports an upper bound of -0.44 for the no-treatment subgroup, whereas Table 2 reports -0.04.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Moraes HS, 2012, The effect of physical exercise on cortisol levels in older adults: a systematic review, Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saude, 17, 314

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–107 of 107

Metadata

Authors
Beserra, A. H. N., Kameda, P., Deslandes, A. C., Schuch, F. B., Laks, J., & Moraes, H. S. D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; UFRJ, Brazil
  • Universidade La Salle (BR)
Venue
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Published
2018-12
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
360-368
ISSN
  • 2237-6089 (ISSN-L)
  • 2238-0019
OpenAlex
W2904844942
Cited by
108
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (E-26/203, E-26/, E-26/203.193/2016)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
physical activity, cortisol, major depressive disorder, exercise training, aerobic exercise, chronic stress, depression treatment, exercise frequency
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review