Cited by 502Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliverySurfactants and Colloidal SystemsDrug Solubulity and Delivery Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Polymeric Micelles for Delivery of Poorly Water-Soluble Compounds

Kwon, Glen S.·2003·Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems

Abstract

Amphiphilic polymers assemble into nanoscopic supramolecular core-shell structures, termed polymeric micelles, which are under extensive study for drug delivery. There are several reasons for this growing interest. Polymeric micelles maybe safe for parenteral administration relative to existing solubilizing agents (for instance, Cremophor EL), permitting an increase in the dose of potent yet toxic and poorly water soluble compounds. Polymeric micelles solubilize important poorly water-soluble compounds, such as amphotericin B (AmB), propofol, paclitaxel, and photosensitizers. A major factor in drug solubilization is the compatibility of a drug and a core of a polymeric micelle. In this context, we may consider Pluronics, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-phospholipid conjugates, PEG-b-poly(ester)s, and PEG-b-poly(L-amino acid)s for drug delivery. Polymeric micelles may circulate for prolonged periods in blood, evade host defenses, and gradually release drug. Thus, they may show a preferential accumulation at sites of disease such as solid tumors. Polymeric micelles inhibit p-glycoprotein at drug-resistant tumors, gastrointestinal tract, and blood/brain barrier, perhaps providing a way to overcome drug resistance in cancer and increase drug absorption from the gut and drug absorption into the brain. Lastly, polymeric micelles may reduce the self-aggregation of polyene antibiotics, key membrane-acting drugs used to combat life-threatening systemic fungal diseases. In this way, they may reduce its dose-limiting toxicity without a loss of antifungal activity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1615/critrevtherdrugcarriersyst.v20.i5.20

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kwon, G. S.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Kwon, Glen S.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems
Publisher
Begell House
Published
2003
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
357-403
ISSN
0743-4863 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082105104
Cited by
502
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 35
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-43346-06)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
Keywords
polymeric micelles, poorly water-soluble drugs, drug solubilization, drug delivery, amphotericin B, propofol, paclitaxel, photosensitizers, poloxamer, tumor targeting, P-glycoprotein inhibition, drug resistance, polyene antibiotics, antifungal agents, parenteral administration
MeSH terms
Drug Stability, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Micelles, Pharmacokinetics, Polyethylene Glycols, Solubility, Surface-Active Agents, Water, Poloxamer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review