Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NETWORK MEMORY: THE INFLUENCE OF PAST AND CURRENT NETWORKS ON PERFORMANCE.

Soda, G., Usai, A., Zaheer, A.·2004·Academy of Management Journal
DOI 10.2307/20159629
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper investigates the efficacy of alternative network structures from the perspective of time. We connect social structures to outcomes, using the history of relations to capture past social capital. In this way, time becomes a contingent factor with which to evaluate the relative efficacy of alternative network structures. We show that, in the Italian TV production industry, current structural holes rather than past ones, but past closure rather than current closure, help current network performance. Thus, structural holes and closure are both valuable but at different points in time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/20159629

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Soda, G., Usai, A., & Zaheer, A.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2004-12-01
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
893-906
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
DOI
10.2307/20159629
OpenAlex
W2024845933
Cited by
437
References
56
FWCI
32.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.