Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis.

Louis, Meryl Reis, Burrell, Gibson, Morgan, Gareth·1983·Administrative Science Quarterly

DOI 10.2307/2392394

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2392394

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems1
Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249410 · Cited by 5,263
Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure
Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/09513579510146996 · Cited by 3,321
Entrepreneurial Action And The Role Of Uncertainty In The Theory Of The Entrepreneur
McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379628 · Cited by 3,103
Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research
Straub, D., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01324 · Cited by 2,797
Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259200 · Cited by 2,776
Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective
Geels, F. W. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022 · Cited by 1,718
Convergent Stakeholder Theory
Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259075 · Cited by 1,595
Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4310758 · Cited by 1,426
Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology
Mingers, J. (2001) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709 · Cited by 1,380
Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory
Astley, W. G., & de Ven, A. H. V. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392620 · Cited by 1,224
A Review of the Predictors, Linkages, and Biases in IT Innovation Adoption Research
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056 · Cited by 1,136
Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants
Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140602 · Cited by 1,058
Customer experience: fundamental premises and implications for research
Becker, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00718-x · Cited by 944
Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508403010001376 · Cited by 835
Diversity in information systems action research methods
Baskerville, R., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1998) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000298 · Cited by 689
What Is Personalization? Perspectives on the Design and Implementation of Personalization in Information Systems
Fan, H., & Poole, M. S. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10919392.2006.9681199 · Cited by 404
Big data: From beginning to future
Yaqoob, I., Hashem, I. A. T., Gani, A., Mokhtar, S., Ahmed, E., Anuar, N. B., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2016) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.009 · Cited by 410
The Possibilities of Phenomenology for Organizational Research
Gill, M. J. (2014) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428113518348 · Cited by 385
Multi-paddock grazing on rangelands, Why the perceptual dichotomy between research results and rancher experience
Teague, R., Provenza, F., Kreuter, U., Steffens, T., & Barnes, M. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.064 · Cited by 319
Organizational Learning: Diverging Communities of Practice?
Easterby-Smith, M., Snell, R., & Gherardi, S. (1998) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507698293001 · Cited by 302
Using grounded theory to understand software process improvement: A study of Irish software product companies
Coleman, G., & O’Connor, R. (2007) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.011 · Cited by 204
Dialogue in participatory design
Luck, R. (2003) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(03)00040-1 · Cited by 203
Can social systems be autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann's social theory
Mingers, J. (2002) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.00367 · Cited by 160
Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers
McCaughey, D., & Bruning, N. S. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-39 · Cited by 160
The spiritual organization: critical reflections on the instrumentality of workplace spirituality
Case, P., & Gosling, J. (2010) · Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion · doi:10.1080/14766086.2010.524727 · Cited by 153
Theory Assessment and Agenda Setting in Political CSR: A Critical Theory Perspective
Scherer, A. G. (2018) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12137 · Cited by 149
An institutional theory of leadership
Biggart, N. W., & Hamilton, G. G. (1987) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188638702300401 · Cited by 132
Leadership Development in Organizations: Multiple Discourses and Diverse Practice
Mabey, C. (2013) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00344.x · Cited by 128
Twenty‐Five Years of Word‐of‐Mouth Studies: A Critical Review of Tourism Research
Confente, I. (2015) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.2029 · Cited by 111
Ideology in HRM Scholarship: Interrogating the Ideological Performativity of ‘New Unitarism’
Greenwood, M., & Van Buren, H. J. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3084-z · Cited by 66
African American adolescent girls’ beliefs about skin tone and colorism
Abrams, J. A., Belgrave, F. Z., Williams, C. D., & Maxwell, M. L. (2020) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/0095798420928194 · Cited by 49
Ageing employees and human resource management – evidence of gender-sensitivity?
Aaltio, I., Maria Salminen, H., & Koponen, S. (2014) · Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/edi-10-2011-0076 · Cited by 36
Using a grounded theory approach for exploring software product management challenges
Jantunen, S., & Gause, D. C. (2014) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.050 · Cited by 31
E-procurement quality from an internal customer perspective: Construct development, refinement, and replication using a mixed-methods approach
Brandon-Jones, A. (2017) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2016-0480 · Cited by 30
Employer branding and career theory: new directions for research
Martin, G., & Cerdin, J.-L. (2014) · Strategic Talent Management · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139424585.009 · Cited by 20
Narrative Beyond Prison Gates: Contradiction, Complexity, and Reconciliation
Yardley, E., Wilson, D., Kemp, D., & Brookes, M. (2015) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x13507042 · Cited by 18
Complexity and Organizational Communication: A Quest for Common Ground
Poutanen, P., Siira, K., & Aula, P. (2016) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484316639713 · Cited by 10

Authors: Louis, M. R., Burrell, G., & Morgan, G.
Venue: Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher: JSTOR
Published: 1983-03
Volume: 28
Issue: 1
Pages: 153
ISSN: 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/2392394
OpenAlex: W2332433940
Cited by: 5,588
References: 0
FWCI: 83.92
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review