The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Groups in Context: A Model of Task Group Effectiveness
Abstract
Deborah L. Gladstein This study tests a comprehensive model of group effectiveness with 100 sales teams in the communications industry. Results indicate that traditional theories of group effectiveness match the implicit theories of team members. These theories account for 90 percent of the variance in team satisfaction and self-reported effectiveness but none of the variance in the teams' sales performance. The findings suggest that theories of group effectiveness need to be revised to include the way in which teams manage interactions across their boundary and the impact of the organizational context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations
Perrow, C. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091811 · Cited by 2,509
Boundary spanning roles and organization structure
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257905 · Cited by 1,518
Cited by
A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships
Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400103 · Cited by 5,826
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667054 · Cited by 3,359
Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741 · Cited by 3,071
Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667029 · Cited by 2,971
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x · Cited by 2,623
BEYOND SELF-MANAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF TEAM EMPOWERMENT.
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256874 · Cited by 2,110
Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277134 · Cited by 1,930
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635 · Cited by 1,671
Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor?
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639402000206 · Cited by 1,632
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory
Pelled, L. H. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.6.615 · Cited by 1,489
The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks
D'Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, L., & Beaulieu, M.-D. (2005) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820500082529 · Cited by 1,456
The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0806 · Cited by 1,364
Cummings, G. G., Tate, K., Lee, S., Wong, C. A., Paananen, T., Micaroni, S. P. M., & Chatterjee, G. E. (2018) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016 · Cited by 637
Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022465 · Cited by 563
Do team processes really have an effect on clinical performance? A systematic literature review
Schmutz, J., & Manser, T. (2013) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aes513 · Cited by 366
Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., & John, R. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0044 · Cited by 350
Buyer-Supplier Collaboration in Product Development Projects
Hoegl, M., & Wagner, S. M. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206304272291 · Cited by 312
Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis
Paris, C. R., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130050084879 · Cited by 308
Zaccaro, S. J., Gilbert, J. A., Thor, K. K., & Mumford, M. D. (1991) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(91)90018-w · Cited by 283
Abusive Supervision Climate: A Multiple-Mediation Model of its Impact on Group Outcomes
Priesemuth, M., Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Folger, R. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0237 · Cited by 230
Interdisciplinary collaboration within Quebec community health care centres
Sicotte, C., D’Amour, D., & Moreault, M.-P. (2002) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00232-5 · Cited by 204
(2007) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 141
Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams
Walsh, J. P., & Maloney, N. G. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00346.x · Cited by 114
Social identification effects in product and process development teams
Scott, S. G. (1997) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/s0923-4748(97)00007-6 · Cited by 98
Aubé, C., Rousseau, V., Mama, C., & Morin, E. M. (2009) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9113-5 · Cited by 94
The Moderating Effects of Virtuality on the Antecedents and Outcome of NPD Team Trust
Bierly, P. E., Stark, E. M., & Kessler, E. H. (2009) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00680.x · Cited by 85
Interprofessional team member’s satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital
Espinoza, P., Peduzzi, M., Agreli, H. F., & Sutherland, M. A. (2018) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-018-0290-z · Cited by 55
Liu, X., & Liu, J. (2013) · Nankai Business Review International · doi:10.1108/nbri-07-2013-0023 · Cited by 48
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., & Zornoza, A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12449 · Cited by 47
Intra-team conflict: the moderating effect of emotional self-leadership
Flores, H. R., Jiang, X., & Manz, C. C. (2018) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/ijcma-07-2017-0065 · Cited by 30
Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Stark, E. M. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)00045-8 · Cited by 151
Aronson, Z. H., Shenhar, A. J., & Reilly, R. R. (2010) · The Journal of High Technology Management Research · doi:10.1016/j.hitech.2010.02.002 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Gladstein, D. L.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1984-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 499
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055495615
- Cited by
- 1,782
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
