The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment
Abstract
How can we explain the persistence of gender hierarchy over transformations in its socioeconomic base? Part of the answer lies in the mediation of gender inequality by taken-for-granted interactional processes that rewrite inequality into new institutional arrangements. The problems of interacting cause actors to automatically sex-categorize others and, thus, to cue gender stereotypes that have various effects on interactional outcomes, usually by modifying the performance of other, more salient identities. Because changes in the status dimension of gender stereotypes lag behind changes in resource inequalities, interactional status processes can reestablish gender inequalities in new structural forms. Interactional sex categorization also biases the choice of comparison others, causing men and women to judge differently the rewards available to them. Operating in workplace relations, these processes conserve inequality by driving the gender-labeling of jobs, constructing people as gender-interested actors, contributing to employers' discriminatory preferences, and mediating men's and women's perceptions of alternatives and their willingness to settle for given job outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Valuation is a social process and as such will be influenced by gender status beliefs, which privilege men and 'masculine' attributes and objects over their feminine counterparts (Ridgeway 1997).”
From Gendering Reciprocity: Solving a Puzzle of Nonreciprocation (2013) · cites this paper as Ridgeway 1997
Citations
Cites
Men and Women of the Corporation.
Strauss, G., & Kanter, R. M. (1978) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2522922 · Cited by 7,292
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
Willer, D., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2073157 · Cited by 7,207
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
The Economics of Discrimination.
Collard, D. A., & Becker, G. S. (1972) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230052 · Cited by 3,642
Sex Differences in Social Behavior
Eagly, A. H. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203781906 · Cited by 3,440
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60317-2 · Cited by 3,367
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991) · Cited by 2,341
Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal1
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1972.tb00018.x · Cited by 1,857
Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization
(1992) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(92)90251-v · Cited by 1,754
A dual process model of impression formation.
Brewer, M. B. (1988) · Cited by 1,499
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
“For example, Gutek and Morasch (1982) argued that gender roles spill over into the workplace, and Ridgeway (1997) maintained that gender provides an “implicit, background identity” (p. 231) in the workplace.”
BackgroundThe Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107 · Cited by 5,446
“While Ridgeway (1997) and Tilly (1998) make important strides in specifying the cognitive and social mechanisms involved in gender boundary-work, similar analyses are needed concerning cultural narratives that play a crucial role in the reproduction of gender boundaries [along the lines developed…”
BackgroundMethodAcker, J. R. (2006) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243206289499 · Cited by 3,858
Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations
Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243204265269 · Cited by 1,823
Self-citationGender As a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism
Risman, B. J. (2004) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243204265349 · Cited by 1,451
The Leadership Styles of Women and Men
Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen‐Schmidt, M. C. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00241 · Cited by 1,520
The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review
Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.41331491 · Cited by 1,362
“…from stereotypes associated with underrepresented groups in a particular occupational context, implicit status differences between demographic groups may also be a mechanism by which contextual factors such as occupational demography filter into team-level interactions (see Ridgeway, 1991, 1997).”
BackgroundGender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self‐Assessments
Correll, S. J. (2001) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/321299 · Cited by 1,320
“While empirical support for actual gender differences in mathematical competence is weak (Baker and Jones 1993; Finn 1980; Harnisch 1984; Hyde et al. 1990), the belief of male mathematical superiority itself is widely dispersed in American culture.”
BackgroundInfluentialGender, Status, and Leadership
Ridgeway, C. L. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00233 · Cited by 1,270
“…in same-sex settings, ongoing events in the workplace may trigger gender associations among participants, leading them over time to collectively construe their task (e.g., selling securities) in gender-typed terms even when it was not initially gender-linked by the larger culture (Ridgeway, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe Influence of Attitudes on Behavior
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Lohmann, S., & Albarracín, D. (2018) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · doi:10.4324/9781315178103-5 · Cited by 1,060
Legitimacy as a Social Process
Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123101 · Cited by 1,027
Self-citationThe Intersection of Gender and Race in the Labor Market
Browne, I., & Misra, J. (2003) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100016 · Cited by 994
Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations
Correll, S. J. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900106 · Cited by 934
The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations
Castilla, E. J., & Benard, S. (2010) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543 · Cited by 862
“…that local cultures can trigger individual cognitive and interactional biases against low-status groups and that the processes of evaluation themselves are infl uenced by the cultural context in which individuals interact (Ridgeway, 1997; Correll and Ridgeway, 2003; Lamont, 2009; Turco, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodThe Gender System and Interaction
Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.191 · Cited by 796
“Thus, interaction plays an important role in sustaining or modifying the gender system as a whole in the face of continually changing material and social structural conditions (Ridgeway 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationCarr, D., & Friedman, M. A. (2005) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/002214650504600303 · Cited by 730
Eviction and the Reproduction of Urban Poverty
Desmond, M. (2012) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/666082 · Cited by 720
Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers
Castilla, E. J. (2008) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/588738 · Cited by 717
“…field-based literature on employer evaluation bias (e.g., Mobley 1982; Tsui and Gutek 1984; Pulakos et al. 1989) and even biased self-assessments (Ridgeway 1997; Correll 2001).7 Individual-level accounts, common in early psychological and organizational behavior studies, argue that, for various…”
BackgroundRidgeway, C. L. (2008) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243208330313 · Cited by 762
Self-citationTHE EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE GENDERED ORGANIZATION
Britton, D. M. (2000) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124300014003004 · Cited by 703
Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators.
Paustian‐Underdahl, S. C., Walker, L. S., & Woehr, D. J. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036751 · Cited by 782
Occupational Feminization and Pay: Assessing Causal Dynamics Using 1950-2000 U.S. Census Data
Levanon, A., England, P., & Allison, P. D. (2009) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.0.0264 · Cited by 600
Martin, P. Y. (2004) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2004.0081 · Cited by 592
“Gender scholars, I am happy to say, were in the vanguard of this development (for example Acker 1992; Connell 1987; Lorber 1994; Reskin 1988; Ridgeway 1997; Risman 1998).”
BackgroundEly, R. J., & MEYERSON, D. E. (2000) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(00)22004-2 · Cited by 656
Feeling Race: Theorizing the Racial Economy of Emotions
Bonilla‐Silva, E. (2019) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122418816958 · Cited by 584
Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering
Cech, E. A., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S. S., & Seron, C. (2011) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122411420815 · Cited by 548
Sexual Harassment, Workplace Authority, and the Paradox of Power
McLaughlin, H., Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2012) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122412451728 · Cited by 617
Harassment Based on Sex: Protecting Social Status in the Context of Gender Hierarchy
Berdahl, J. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351879 · Cited by 563
“be seen as a punitive means of “doing gender”: defining, enacting, and enforcing masculinity in men and femininity in women with everyday social practices (cf. Burgess & Borgida, 1999; Ely & Meyerson, 2000; Padavic & Reskin, 2002; Ridgeway, 1997; West & Zimmerman, 1987).”
BackgroundGorman, E. H. (2005) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240507000408 · Cited by 534
Activist Choice Homophily and the Crowdfunding of Female Founders
Greenberg, J., & Mollick, E. (2016) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839216678847 · Cited by 548
“…concerning occupational gender-typing and underlying schemas predicts that people often hold unconscious biases about the gender of the archetypical employee in a particular occupation or industry (White et al., 1989; Ridgeway, 1997, 2011; Williams, 2000: ch. 3; Gorman, 2005; Heilman, 2012).”
BackgroundThe Organizational Reproduction of Inequality
Amis, J., Mair, J., & Munir, K. A. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0033 · Cited by 548
Motherhood as a Status Characteristic
Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00380.x · Cited by 502
Self-citationOverwork and the Slow Convergence in the Gender Gap in Wages
Cha, Y., & Weeden, K. A. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414528936 · Cited by 498
Interpersonal Stratification: Status, Power, and Subordination
Fiske, S. T. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002026 · Cited by 492
One Egalitarianism or Several? Two Decades of Gender-Role Attitude Change in Europe
Knight, C. R., & Brinton, M. C. (2017) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/689814 · Cited by 474
Leading at the top: Understanding women's challenges above the glass ceiling
Glass, C., & Cook, A. (2015) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.003 · Cited by 559
Working for the Woman? Female Managers and the Gender Wage Gap
Cohen, P. N., & Huffman, M. L. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200502 · Cited by 460
Including Mechanisms in Our Models of Ascriptive Inequality
Reskin, B. F. (2003) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3088900 · Cited by 448
From glass ceiling to inequality regimes
Acker, J. R. (2009) · Sociologie du Travail · doi:10.1016/j.soctra.2009.03.004 · Cited by 492
“A large literature exists on the reproduction of gender in interactions in organizations (see Reskin, 2003; Ridgeway, 1997).”
BackgroundA feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences
Ely, R. J., & Padavic, I. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26585842 · Cited by 445
“The interactional arena, in particular, has garnered a great deal of scholarly attention as a crucial site in which such negotiations occur (Ridgeway, 1997; Ridgeway & Correll, 2000; West & Zimmerman, 1987).”
BackgroundImplicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations
Dasgupta, N. (2004) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/b:sore.0000027407.70241.15 · Cited by 434
“…show groupbased inequality in several domains of everyday life—healthcare, housing, education, employment, and the justice system (Badgett, 1996; Daniels, 2001; Ellis and Riggle, 1996; Leonhardt, 2002; Portwood, 1995; Raudenbush and Kasim, 1998; Ridgeway, 1997; Rubenstein, 1996; Stohlberg, 2002).”
Consensus and the Creation of Status Beliefs
Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2006) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0139 · Cited by 404
“…simulations of the diffusion processes have shown that if people form and spread status beliefs in local intercategory encounters as the theory argues, then nearly consensual status beliefs would indeed be a logical outcome under many social structural conditions (Ridgeway and Balkwell 1997).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHow Women Engineers Do and Undo Gender: Consequences for Gender Equality
Powell, A., Bagilhole, B., & Dainty, A. (2008) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00406.x · Cited by 390
“Since people bring their beliefs about gender into social relations with little thought, gendered performance is pervasive and taken for granted (Ridgeway, 1997).”
BackgroundDiscretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization
Kleinbaum, A. M., Stuart, T. E., & Tushman, M. L. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0804 · Cited by 370
“…across jobs and ranks in organizations and have argued that homophily tends to subtly reinforce social stratification by providing more beneficial social capital to members of majority groups (Baron et al. 1986, Bielby and Baron 1986, Ibarra 1993, Ridgeway 1997, McGuire 2002, Singh et al. 2010).”
Race and Formal Volunteering: The Differential Effects of Class and Religion
Musick, M. A., Wilson, J., & Bynum, W. B. (2000) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/78.4.1539 · Cited by 357
Pavalko, E. K., Mossakowski, K. N., & Hamilton, V. J. (2003) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/1519813 · Cited by 365
Documenting Desegregation: Segregation in American Workplaces by Race, Ethnicity, and Sex, 1966–2003
Tomaskovic‐Devey, D., Zimmer, C., Stainback, K., Robinson, C. L., Taylor, T., & McTague, T. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100403 · Cited by 338
“Research supported by The National Science Foundation grants SES-0216424 and SES-0216843. and promotions (Kmec 2003a; Petersen and Morgan 1995; Tomaskovic-Devey 1993) as well as with the cementing of status expectations and distinctions (Ridgeway 1997; Tilly 1998).”
MethodRiegle‐Crumb, C., King, B., Grodsky, E., & Muller, C. L. (2012) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831211435229 · Cited by 355
“Several gender theorists point to the level of interactions and exchanges as perhaps the least studied and most potentially informative area of research on gender inequality (Deutsch, 2007; Ridgeway, 1997; Risman, 2004).”
Bobbitt‐Zeher, D. (2011) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243211424741 · Cited by 321
“Not only are gendered beliefs and organizational context influenced and reinforced (or challenged) by interactions (Ridgeway 1997; Martin 2003), but gender itself is created and re-created through interaction (West and Zimmerman 1987).”
BackgroundEngineering Identity: Gender and Professional Identity Negotiation among Women Engineers
Hatmaker, D. M. (2012) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x · Cited by 319
What's in the “old boys” network? Accessing social capital in gendered and racialized networks
McDonald, S. (2011) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.10.002 · Cited by 307
“According to status characteristics theory (Berger et al., 1972; Ridgeway, 1997), people engage in an unconscious process socio-cognitive stereotyping, which involves labeling and categorizing others based on personal characteristics such as gender and race.”
BackgroundGender Socialization and Identity Theory
Carter, M. (2014) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci3020242 · Cited by 299
“Identities based on gender affect the basic rules that people use to frame interaction [40,66]; the fact that gender can emerge in person, role, and social (or group) identities shows how powerful perceptions of gender are [67]:”
BackgroundThe fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings: A within-person field experiment.
Shockley, K. M., Gabriel, A. S., Robertson, D., Rosen, C. C., Chawla, N., Ganster, M. L., & Ezerins, M. E. (2021) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000948 · Cited by 323
`Mobilizing Masculinities': Women's Experiences of Men at
Martin, P. Y. (2001) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050840184003 · Cited by 301
Organizational Approaches to Inequality: Inertia, Relative Power, and Environments
Stainback, K., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Skaggs, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120014 · Cited by 293
Unsettling Universities' Incongruous, Gendered Bureaucratic Structures: A Case-study Approach
Bird, S. R. (2010) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00510.x · Cited by 285
Tomaskovic‐Devey, D., Thomas, M. E., & Johnson, K. R. (2005) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/431779 · Cited by 289
Cha, Y. (2010) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122410365307 · Cited by 311
Networks of Opportunity: Gender, Race, and Job Leads
McDonald, S., Lin, N., & Ao, D. (2009) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2009.56.3.385 · Cited by 284
From sex roles to gender structure
Risman, B. J., & Davis, G. (2013) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392113479315 · Cited by 318
“Ridgeway and her colleagues (Ridgeway, 1991, 1997, 2001, 2011; Ridgeway and Correll, 2004) show convincingly that the status expectations attached to gender and race categories are crosssituational.”
BackgroundWhy Should Women Get Less? Evidence on the Gender Pay Gap from Multifactorial Survey Experiments
Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., & Sauer, C. (2017) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122416683393 · Cited by 269
An organizational approach to undoing gender: The unlikely case of offshore oil platforms
Ely, R. J., & MEYERSON, D. E. (2010) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.002 · Cited by 283
Gendering the Job: Networks and Recruitment at a Call Center
Fernandez, R. M., & Sosa, M. L. (2005) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/497257 · Cited by 263
“The fact that the interviewing process seems to produce the largest boost in the percentage of women is consistent with the idea that it is the interaction with the candidate that seems to activate the stereotypical conception of gender (Correll 2001, 2004; Ridgeway 1997).”
ResultHome-to-Job and Job-to-Home Spillover: The Impact of Company Policies and Workplace Culture
Mennino, S. F., Rubin, B. A., & Brayfield, A. A. (2005) · Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00006.x · Cited by 260
Taylor, V. A. (1999) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124399013001002 · Cited by 273
Cech, E. A., & Blair‐Loy, M. (2010) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2010.57.3.371 · Cited by 293
Sex Segregation, Labor Process Organization, and Gender Earnings Inequality
Tomaskovic‐Devey, D., & Skaggs, S. L. (2002) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/344214 · Cited by 255
“We agree with Ridgeway (1997) that gender and gender devaluation are interactional accomplishments and so must take place in concrete social settings (i.e., the workplaces where labor processes are negotiated, wages are set, and people allocated to jobs).”
BackgroundCracking the Glass Cages? Restructuring and Ascriptive Inequality at Work
Kalev, A. (2009) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/597175 · Cited by 264
Gender, Race, and the Shadow Structure
McGuire, G. M. (2002) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243202016003003 · Cited by 249
Wenger, É., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677431 · Cited by 286
Cross-Level Effects of Workplace Diversity on Sales Performance and Pay
Joshi, A., Liao, H., & Jackson, S. E. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.21794664 · Cited by 246
“The presence of more women and people of color at managerial levels should assure more equal access to resources (Ridgeway, 1997), but in organizations with low representations of female or ethnic minority man agers, organizational hierarchies accentuate status differences (Wharton, 1992).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHierarchical Rank and Women’s Organizational Mobility: Glass Ceilings in Corporate Law Firms
Gorman, E. H., & Kmec, J. A. (2009) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/595950 · Cited by 244
Britton, D. M. (2016) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243216681494 · Cited by 232
“Drawing attention to such moments highlights gender (rather than allowing it to fade into the background), which at the same time activates a host of negative status beliefs about femininity (Ridgeway 1997, 2008, 2011; Ridgeway and Correll 2004).”
BackgroundCreating Status of Women Reports: Institutional Housekeeping as "Women's Work"
Bird, S. R., Litt, J. S., & Wang, Y. (2004) · NWSA Journal · doi:10.2979/nws.2004.16.1.194 · Cited by 225
Creating Status Characteristics
Webster, M., & Hysom, S. J. (1998) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657554 · Cited by 212
Phillips, D. J. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.440 · Cited by 210
“…increases the relevance of group-level research on the emergence and persistence of gender hierarchies (Berger, Rosenholtz, and Zelditch, 1980; Ridgeway, 1997; Lucas, 2003; Troyer, 2004) because small firms are closest to the laboratory groups in which the replication of routines and gender…”
BackgroundScaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation
Rivera, L. A., & Tilcsik, A. (2019) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122419833601 · Cited by 219
“Just as the way people evaluate men and women varies based on the structure of the task at hand (see Ridgeway 1997), we argue that the design of tools used to assess merit—or what we term the architecture of evaluation—can influence the degree to which gender stereotypes are expressed in…”
BackgroundMethodBegeny, C. T., Ryan, M. K., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Ravetz, G. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba7814 · Cited by 203
Who’s the Boss? Explaining Gender Inequality in Entrepreneurial Teams
Yang, T., & Aldrich, H. E. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414524207 · Cited by 202
“We believe the key mechanism explaining gender inequalities in naturally occurring groups is the “mediating interactional mechanism” proposed by Ridgeway (1997).”
BackgroundGender Inequality and Time Allocations Among Academic Faculty
Winslow, S. (2010) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243210386728 · Cited by 201
Kapilashrami, A., Hill, S., & Meer, N. (2015) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/sth.2015.16 · Cited by 200
Owning the Code: Status Closure in Distributed Groups
Metiu, A. M. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0195 · Cited by 201
“The monopolization of opportunities by groups of higher status at the expense of other groups, a phenomenon identified by Weber (1978) and called closure by sociologists (Parkin 1974, Murphy 1988), is an important hurdle to developing intergroup cooperation.”
BackgroundTowards a Topology of ‘Doing Gender’: An Analysis of Empirical Research and Its Challenges
Nentwich, J. C., & Kelan, E. (2013) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12025 · Cited by 227
“Whatever is gendered ‘feminine’ tends to be devalued; whatever is gendered ‘masculine’ receives higher status, and is perceived as more professional and as representing competence (Heilman, 2001; Ridgeway, 1997).”
BackgroundJackson, S., & Joshi, A. (2011) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/12169-020 · Cited by 171
Social Change and The Persistence of Sex Typing: 1974-1997
Lueptow, L. B., Garovich, L., & Lueptow, M. B. (2001) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0077 · Cited by 198
Charles, M. (2003) · Acta Sociologica · doi:10.1177/0001699303464001 · Cited by 188
“See also Connell (1987), Chafetz (1988), Epstein (1988), Ridgeway (1997), and Bourdieu (2001) on the relationship between gender roles and male dominance.”
BackgroundInfluentialInequality, Institutions and Organizations
Amis, J., Munir, K. A., Lawrence, T. B., Hirsch, P. M., & McGahan, A. M. (2018) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840618792596 · Cited by 201
“…towards recognising gender as a multi-level system of disadvantage which includes: at a macro-level, socio-economic disadvantages and cultural norms; at a meso-level, interactional practises within social institutions; and at a micro-level, internalised traits and identities (Ridgeway, 1997, 2014).”
BackgroundWomen Are Teachers, Men Are Professors: A Study of Student Perceptions
Miller, J., & Chamberlin, M. S. (2000) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/1318580 · Cited by 185
The Relational Generation of Workplace Inequalities
Tomaskovic‐Devey, D. (2014) · Social Currents · doi:10.1177/2329496513514032 · Cited by 192
A multilevel, complexity theory approach to understanding gender bias in leadership
Hogue, M., & Lord, R. G. (2007) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.006 · Cited by 189
“…from a number of perspectives, including socialization and role development (Eagly & Karau, 2002), the development of gender-related social status (Ridgeway, 1997; Ridgeway & Balkwell, 1997), and cognitive processes related to social categorization (Heilman, Block, Martell, & Simon, 1989; Lord &…”
BackgroundHill, A., Upadhyay, A., & Beekun, R. I. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2274 · Cited by 182
Great Divides: The Cultural, Cognitive, and Social Bases of the Global Subordination of Women
Epstein, C. F. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200101 · Cited by 171
Occupational Sex Composition and the Gendered Availability of Workplace Support
Taylor, C. J. (2010) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243209359912 · Cited by 170
Don’t mention it: Why people don’t share job information, when they do, and why it matters
Marin, A. (2011) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.11.002 · Cited by 169
“Research (Ridgeway 1997) suggests that people are more likely to rely on gender stereotypes when more salient information is unavailable, suggesting that stereotypes may be most activated with weak ties, about whom information holders may know little, and in occupations with no specific training…”
BackgroundDiversity on Corporate Boards: How Much Difference Does Difference Make?Preprint
Rhode, D. L., & Packel, A. K. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1685615 · Cited by 165
The Parity Penalty in Life Course Perspective
Abendroth, A., Huffman, M. L., & Treas, J. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414545986 · Cited by 164
Bursell, M. (2014) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcu047 · Cited by 162
Work Uncertainty and the Promotion of Professional Women: The Case of Law Firm Partnership
Gorman, E. H. (2006) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2007.0004 · Cited by 155
Leuze, K., & Strauß, S. (2016) · Work Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/0950017015624402 · Cited by 153
“In contrast, cultural explanations point out the importance of socially shared stereotypes about male and female traits and skills (Charles and Bradley, 2009), which are internalized during childhood and reproduced by everyday interactions between (adult) women and men (Ridgeway, 1997).”
BackgroundSoliciting Resources from Others: An Integrative Review
Lim, J. H., Tai, K., Bamberger, P. A., & Morrison, E. W. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0034 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Ridgeway, C. L.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ridgeway, Cecilia L.
- ORCID
- Ridgeway, Cecilia L.
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 218
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091725322
- Cited by
- 939
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 28.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- gender inequality, gender stereotypes, interaction processes, sex categorization, gender hierarchy, employment, employment discrimination, gender pay gap, job choice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review