The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA.
Abstract
The institutional entrepreneurship implicit in a firm's sponsorship of its technology as a common standard is beset by several challenges. These challenges arise from a standard's property to enabl...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
North, D. C. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808678 · Cited by 32,691
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“The multiple data sources helped us accomplish triangulation (Jick, 1979).”
BackgroundTechnological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Understanding the role of the technical in the build-up of sociotechnical constituencies
Molina, A. H. (1998) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(98)00093-5 · Cited by 45
Cited by
Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.590299 · Cited by 3,519
Institutions and Institutional Work
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006) · The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies · doi:10.4135/9781848608030.n7 · Cited by 3,338
INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN EMERGING FIELDS: HIV/AIDS TREATMENT ADVOCACY IN CANADA.
Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159610 · Cited by 2,138
Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003 · Cited by 1,797
Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006 · Cited by 1,567
Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective
Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004 · Cited by 1,537
Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization
Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492610387222 · Cited by 1,355
West, J. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00052-0 · Cited by 854
Data‐Driven Materials Science: Status, Challenges, and Perspectives
Himanen, L., Geurts, A., Foster, A. S., & Rinke, P. (2019) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201900808 · Cited by 808
A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda
Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694 · Cited by 755
The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem
Ansari, S. (., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2442 · Cited by 556
Self-citationWijen, F. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0218 · Cited by 459
Institutional Work to Maintain Professional Power: Recreating the Model of Medical Professionalism
Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612445116 · Cited by 448
Conceptualizing Historical Organization Studies
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2016) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0133 · Cited by 410
Tumbas, S., Berente, N., & Brocke, J. V. (2018) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-018-0055-0 · Cited by 242
Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems
Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12351 · Cited by 223
Chen, L., Yi, J., Li, S., & Tong, T. W. (2022) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320988337 · Cited by 177
Building the Value of Next-Generation Platforms: The Paradox of Diminishing Returns
Cennamo, C. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316658350 · Cited by 173
Regulatory Uncertainty: A Reason to Postpone Investments? Not Necessarily
Hoffmann, V. H., Trautmann, T., & Hamprecht, J. (2009) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00866.x · Cited by 169
Barrett, M., Heracleous, L., & Walsham, G. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.09 · Cited by 128
Wu, C.-Y., Hu, M.-C., & Ni, F.-C. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.009 · Cited by 101
Juma, N., Olabisi, J., & Griffin‐EL, E. (2023) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1462 · Cited by 56
The evolution of OSS governance: a dimensional comparative analysis
De Noni, I., Ganzaroli, A., & Orsi, L. (2013) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2012.10.003 · Cited by 31
A Tale of Two Types of Standard Setting: Evidence From Artificial Intelligence in China
Zhang, J., Li, X., & Tong, T. (2024) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221145130 · Cited by 23
Nordt, A., Raven, R., Malekpour, S., & Sharp, D. (2024) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103707 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Garud, R., Jain, S., & Kumaraswamy, A.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 196-214
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2100512356
- Cited by
- 1,187
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 71.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
