Cited by 223Digital Platforms and EconomicsInnovation Diffusion and ForecastingInnovation and Knowledge Management

Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems

Ozalp, Hakan, Cennamo, Carmelo, Gawer, Annabelle·2018·Journal of Management Studies

Abstract

We study intergenerational platform‐technology transitions as instances of potentially disruptive innovation at the ecosystem level. Examining the launch of 12 platform technologies in the U.S. videogame industry covering three console generations from 1993 until 2010, we show that incumbents introducing next‐generation platform technologies with advanced capabilities increase the challenges of developing complements for the platform technology, steepening complementors’ learning curves and disrupting the very same complementors that platform owners need to thrive in the next‐generation competition. We find that, because of these struggles, platforms with advanced capabilities but high complement‐development challenges show a pattern of defection of complementors toward rival, less challenging platforms. Our study extends mainstream disruptive‐innovation theory to the context of platform‐based ecosystems by offering a systemic view that accounts for disaffection on the part of technology complementors—rather than end users—as the main reason for disruption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joms.12351

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After emergence is concluded, the DPE is orchestrated and maneuvered through phases of technological change, sustaining its competitive position against other ecosystems or powerful complementors within its own ecosystem.

    “After emergence is concluded, the DPE is orchestrated and maneuvered through phases of technological change (Ozalp et al., 2018), sustaining its competitive position against other ecosystems or powerful complementors within its own ecosystem (Zhu & Liu, 2018).”
  • Complementors may seize an opportunity to challenge the focal platform firms' position during the transition.

    “Complementors may, however, seize an opportunity to challenge the focal platform firms' position during the transition (Ozalp et al., 2018).”
  • Ultimately, the DPE may enter a stage of strategic or technological renewal or even end in decline or obsolescence.

    “In addition, ultimately, the DPE may enter a stage of strategic or technological renewal or even end in decline or obsolescence(Ozalp et al., 2018).”
  • These stages are expected to be induced from significant technological change or through a loss in profitability or growth opportunities.

    “These stages are expected to be induced from significant technological change (Cennamo, 2018;Ozalp et al., 2018) or through a loss in profitability or growth opportunities (Zhu & Liu, 2018).”
  • With certain strategic actions, dominant complementors may affect the distribution of power in the entire ecosystem, causing leverage over other complementors or even the focal platform firm.

    “With certain strategic actions, dominant complementors may affect the distribution of power in the entire ecosystem, causing leverage over other complementors or even the focal platform firm (Ozalp et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Afuah, A.N. (2000). 'How much do your co -optetitors' capabilities matter in the face of a technological change?' Strategic Management Journal , 21 , 387 -404.
  2. Cennamo, C., Ozalp, H., & Kretschmer, T. (in press). 'Platform Architecture and Quality Tradeoffs of Multihoming Complements'. Information Systems Research , in press.
  3. Christensen, C. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail . Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  4. Harrison, P. (2000). GDC 2000 Keynote: Phil Harrison: The Future of the Playstation, Game Developers Conference 2000 . Available at http://www.gdcvault.com/play/1014853/GDC-2000-Keynote-Phil-Harrison (accessed August 28, 2017).
  5. Pettus, S. (2013). Service Games: The Rise and Fall of SEGA: Enhanced Edition . CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
  6. Rosenbloom, R.S. (2000). 'Leadership, capabilities, and technological change: the transformation of NCR in the electronic era'. Strategic Management Journal , 21 , 1083 -1103.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Ozalp, Hakan
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-16
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
1203-1241
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
OpenAlex
W2799709652
Cited by
223
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 3
FWCI
33.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
disruptive innovation, platform ecosystems, video game industry, video game consoles, complementors, learning curve, platform capabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review