The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Salience of Feedback on Error and Its Effect on EFL Writing Quality
Open accessAbstract
El propósito de este estudio era determinar los efectos de la utilización de símbolos de corrección en gramática como una estrategia para ayudar a los alumnos a mejorar la habilidad de la escritura en textos descriptivos. La investigadora quiso responderla pregunta si el uso de códigos de corrección como una forma de realimentación indirecta del profesor sería eficaz o no para ayudar a los alumnos a mejorar la gramática.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435
ASSESSING TEACHING PRESENCE IN A COMPUTER CONFERENCING CONTEXT
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875 · Cited by 1,885
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763
Cited by
Error feedback in L2 writing classes
Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00039-x · Cited by 981
The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing
Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001 · Cited by 900
Evidence in support of written corrective feedback
Bitchener, J. (2008) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004 · Cited by 871
Ferris, D. R. (2004) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005 · Cited by 679
Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9 · Cited by 648
Ferris, D. R. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990490 · Cited by 523
The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes
Leki, I. (1991) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x · Cited by 516
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Paulus, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9 · Cited by 522
Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback?
Hyland, F. (2003) · System · doi:10.1016/s0346-251x(03)00021-6 · Cited by 411
Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing
Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(94)90012-4 · Cited by 308
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011 · Cited by 278
The Effect of Error Correction on L2 Grammar Knowledge and Oral Proficiency
DEKEYSER, R. M. (1993) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01999.x · Cited by 256
ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work
Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J. M. (1988) · System · doi:10.1016/0346-251x(88)90078-4 · Cited by 233
The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate
Polio, C. (2012) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004 · Cited by 209
Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications
Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90032-1 · Cited by 207
Saito, H. (1994) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v11i2.633 · Cited by 183
The Effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: a meta-analysis.
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x · Cited by 175
L2 writing teachers’ perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback
Lee, I. (2003) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2003.08.002 · Cited by 140
Error Correction in the L2 Writing Classroom: What Do Students Think?
Lee, I. (2005) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84 · Cited by 136
Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies
Ferris, D. R. (2012) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444812000250 · Cited by 108
Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: peers or computer program
Lai, Y. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00959.x · Cited by 92
Effect of Written Feedback by Editors on Quality of Reviews: Two Randomized Trials
Callaham, M. L., Knopp, R. K., & Gallagher, E. J. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2781 · Cited by 76
Crosthwaite, P., Ningrum, S., & Lee, I. (2022) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100934 · Cited by 78
The Intersection between SLA and Feedback Research
Bitchener, J. (2019) · Feedback in Second Language Writing · doi:10.1017/9781108635547.007 · Cited by 57
The effects of teacher-written direct vs. indirect feedback on students' writing
Jamalinesari, A., Rahimi, F., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.018 · Cited by 55
Error Correction in the L2 Classroom
Mantello, M. (1997) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.54.1.127 · Cited by 32
M Albelihi, H. H. (2022) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.108680.1 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1986-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067530630
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 34.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
