Cited by 20Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and Management

Modeling Glucagon Action in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Emami, A., Youssef, Joseph El, Rabasa-Lhoret, Remi, Pineau, Joelle, Castle, Jessica R., Haidar, Ahmad·2017·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

The dual-hormone artificial pancreas is an emerging technology to treat type 1 diabetes (T1D). It consists of a glucose sensor, infusion pumps, and a dosing algorithm that directs hormonal delivery. Preclinical optimization of dosing algorithms using computer simulations has the potential to accelerate the pace of development for this technology. However, current simulation environments consider glucose regulation models that either do not include glucagon action submodels or include submodels that were proposed without comparison to other candidate models. We consider here nine candidate models of glucagon action featuring a number of possible characteristics: insulin-independent glucagon action, insulin/glucagon ratio effect on hepatic glucose production, insulin-dependent suppression of glucagon action, and the effect of rate of change of glucagon. To assess the models, we use measurements of plasma insulin, plasma glucagon, and endogenous glucose production collected from experiments involving eight subjects with T1D who receive four subcutaneous glucagon boluses. We estimate each model's parameters using a Bayesian approach, and the models are contrasted based on the deviance information criterion. The model achieving the best fit features insulin-dependent suppression of glucagon action and incorporates effects of both glucagon levels and its rate of change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2016.2593630

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Emami, A., Youssef, J. E., Rabasa-Lhoret, R., Pineau, J., Castle, J. R., & Haidar, A.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2017-07
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
1163-1171
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2484925680
Cited by
20
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
J.-A. DeSève Research Chair
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, dosing algorithm, hepatic glucose production, insulin/glucagon ratio, endogenous glucose production, Bayesian parameter estimation, model selection
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Computer Simulation, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glucagon, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Models, Biological, Pancreas, Artificial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review