CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121Information Systems Theories and ImplementationComputational and Text Analysis MethodsManagement and Organizational Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward Generalizable Sociomaterial Inquiry: A Computational Approach for Zooming in and Out of Sociomaterial Routines1

Gaskin, James, Berente, Nicholas, Lyytinen, Kalle, Yoo, Youngjin·2014·MIS Quarterly
DOI 10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.10
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper, a computational, mixed methods approach that combines qualitative analysis with a novel approach to sequence analysis for studying the entanglement of human activities and digital capabilities in organizational routines is described. The approach is scalable across multiple contexts and complements the dominant idiographic modes of sociomaterial inquiry. The approach is rooted in the epistemology of a “rational reconstruction” consistent with the interpretive stance underlying the sociomaterial position. It arms researchers with the means to seek and uncover regularities in the ways human activities and digital capabilities become entangled across contexts by enabling the identification and articulation of generalizable patterns of sociomaterial activity. The computational approach is founded on sequence-analytic techniques that originated from the field of computational biology (genetics), but are now gaining popularity in the study of temporally ordered social phenomena such as organizational routines. These techniques are extended by drawing upon theoretical insights gained within sociomaterial scholarship on how the digital and the social become entangled. By detecting the variation in activities, actors, artifacts, and affordances that comprise what we denote a sociomaterial routine, the approach directly attends to ways in which human actors and the material features of technology become entangled in patterns of practice. Beyond motivating and describing the approach, the different insights that researchers can generate through its application in the study of the digitalization of organizational routines are illustrated. We conclude by suggesting several lines of inquiry that can enrich sociomaterial research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.10

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bijker, 1995, Of Bicycle, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechical Change
  2. Glaser, 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
  3. Habermas, 1983, Interpretive Social Science Versus Hermeneuticism
  4. Jarke, 2009, Meta Modelling, 43
  5. Lyytinen, 1985, The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas as a Basis for a Theory of Information Systems, 219
  6. Scott, 1990, Technology and Structure: An Organizational-Level Perspective, 109
  7. Weick, 1989, Theoretical Assumptions and Research Methodology Selection, 111
  8. Wittgenstein, 1953, Philosophical Investigations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 121

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gaskin, J., Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y.
Affiliations
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
ORCID
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2014-09-01
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
849-872
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
DOI
10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.10
OpenAlex
W1581782493
Cited by
121
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
FWCI
36.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
organizational routines, digital capabilities, human-technology entanglement, sequence analysis, rational reconstruction, generalizability, affordances, clinical practice patterns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review