The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress
Open accessAbstract
In both the United States and Europe, concerns have been raised about whether preservice and in-service training succeeds in equipping teachers with the professional knowledge they need to deliver consistently high-quality instruction. This article investigates the significance of teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for high-quality instruction and student progress in secondary-level mathematics. It reports findings from a 1-year study conducted in Germany with a representative sample of Grade 10 classes and their mathematics teachers. Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge was theoretically and empirically distinguishable from their content knowledge. Multilevel structural equation models revealed a substantial positive effect of pedagogical content knowledge on students’ learning gains that was mediated by the provision of cognitive activation and individual learning support.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Baumert et al. (2010:139) argue that MCK and MPCK are not picked up incidentally but rather developed through university courses, mentoring received during practice teaching and “reflection on classroom experience”.”
From Mentoring and preparing primary school mathematics teachers (2020) · cites this paper as Baumert et al. (2010:139)
In the citing paper
“Teachers' discipline-specific knowledge is dynamic (Baumert et al., 2010)”
From Preservice teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching: Focus on lesson planning and reflection (2024) · cites this paper as Baumert et al., 2010
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312042002371 · Cited by 2,812
Weighted Likelihood Estimation of Ability in Item Response Theory
Warm, T. A. (1989) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294627 · Cited by 1,216
Back to the Future: Directions for Research in Teaching and Teacher Education
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831207312906 · Cited by 1,164 · cited 1×
“…affect students’ learning gains and motivational development (Bransford, Darling-Hammond, & LePage, 2005; Bransford, Derry, Berliner, & Hammerness, 2005; Grossman & McDonald, 2008; Grossman & Schoenfeld, 2005; Hiebert, Morris, Berk, & Jansen, 2007; Munby, Russell, & Martin, 2001; Reynolds, 1989).”
Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching
Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/428763 · Cited by 902 · cited 13×
“In contrast to Hill and colleagues (Hill et al., 2004; Hill et al., 2007), who conceptualized mathematical knowledge for teaching as an amalgam of the mathematical everyday knowledge that all educated adults should have, a purely mathematical understanding of topics typically taught at school, and mathematical knowled…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCreating contexts for involvement in mathematics.
Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.730 · Cited by 325
Research works printed but not linked: 124
- 10.3102/0013189X07308739 · DOI
- American Council on Education, 1999, To touch the future: Transforming the way teachers are taught
- 10.3102/0162373707313409 · DOI
- 10.1086/461626 · DOI · Paper page
- Ball DL, 1991, Advances in research on teaching: Vol 2 Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice, 1
- Ball DL, 2003, Proceedings of the 2002 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, 3
- Ball DL, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 433
- 10.1111/0161-4681.00046 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-322-83412-6_10 · DOI
- Berliner CD, 1994, Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students, 161
- Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung, 171
- Blömeke S, 2008, Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer—Wissen, Ü berzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare: Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerausbildung [Professional competence of student teachers—Knowledge, beliefs, and learning opportunities of mathematics teacher candidates: Initial findings on the effectiveness of teacher training]
- Bollen KA, 1993, Testing structural equation models
- 10.2307/749118 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312026004473 · DOI
- Bransford J, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 1
- Bransford JD, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world, 40
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-3456-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Brophy J, 2000, Teaching
- Carstensen CH, 2004, PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland—Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs, 371
- Cochran-Smith M, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education
- 10.3102/0002831208323280 · DOI
- 10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000 · DOI
- 10.17763/haer.76.4.d8277u8778245404 · DOI
- De Corte E, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 491
- 10.1080/00220270701305362 · DOI
- Ditton H, 2007, Kompetenzaufbau und Laufbahnen im Schulsystem: Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittuntersuchung an Grundschulen [Competence building and careers in the education system: Results of a longitudinal study in elementary schools]
- 10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.193 · DOI
- 10.2307/749384 · DOI
- 10.2307/749215 · DOI
- 10.2307/749875 · DOI
- Fennema E, 1992, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 147
- Floden RE, 2005, Studying teacher education, 261
- 10.3102/00028312032004687 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-9186-7_9 · DOI
- Goe L, 2007, The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis
- 10.3102/01623737022002129 · DOI
- Goodson IF, 1998, Subject knowledge: Readings for the study of school subjects
- Goodson IF, 1996, Studying school subjects
- Greeno JG, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 15
- Grossman PL, 1995, International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, 2, 20
- 10.1177/0022487107310748 · DOI
- Grossman PL, 2005, Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do, 201
- Harbison RW, 1992, Educational performance of the poor: Lessons from rural northeast Brazil
- Heaton RM, 2000, Teaching mathematics to the new standards: Relearning the dance
- Heller K, 2000, Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen, Revision (KFT 4–12 + R) [Cognitive Abilities Test for Grades 4 to 12, revision]
- Helmke A, 2009, Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Instructional quality and teacher professionality: Diagnosis, evaluation, and enhancement of instruction]
- 10.1177/0022487106295726 · DOI
- 10.3102/01623737027002111 · DOI
- 10.3102/0162373707301711 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701487138 · DOI
- 10.1177/0895904807307061 · DOI
- Jordan A, 2006, Klassifikationsschema für Mathematikaufgaben: Dokumentation der Aufgabenkategorisierung im COACTIV-Projekt [Classification scheme for mathematical tasks: Documentation of the task categorization in the COACTIV study]
- 10.1023/A:1025175812582 · DOI
- Krauss S, 2008, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 873
- 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7 · DOI
- Kunter M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 161
- Kunter M, 2009, Lehrprofessionalität—Bedingungen, Genese, Wirkungen und ihre Messung, 153
- Kunter M, 2007, Studies on the educational quality of schools: The final report on the DFG priority programme, 32
- Lanahan L, 2005, Fundamental problems in the measurement of instructional processes: Estimating reasonable effect sizes and conceptualizing what is important to measure
- Leinhardt G, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 333
- 10.1177/0022487108315581 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10984-006-9014-8 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781410602589 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312038002321 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14 · DOI · Paper page
- Mewborn D, 2003, A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics, 45
- Mitchell R, 1999, Thinking K–16, 3, 1
- 10.1016/0272-7757(94)90003-5 · DOI
- 10.1086/447369 · DOI
- Munby H, 2001, Handbook of research on teaching, 877
- Muthén LK, 2004, Mplus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000, Principles and standards for school mathematics
- National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008, Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel
- 10.3102/00028312037001123 · DOI
- 10.3102/01623737026003237 · DOI
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2004, Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003
- 10.3102/00346543074004525 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543063002167 · DOI
- Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres [PISA 2003: Studies on competence development over a school year]
- Prenzel M, 2006, PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres, 29
- 10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/461723 · DOI
- Reynolds MC, 1989, Knowledge base for the beginning teacher
- 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2673267 · DOI
- Scheerens J, 1997, The foundations of educational effectiveness
- 10.1080/15366360701487021 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701486965 · DOI · Paper page
- Schmidt WH, 2007, The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries. Mathematics teaching in the 21st century (MT21)
- 10.1016/S1080-9724(99)80076-7 · DOI
- 10.1080/15366360701492880 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00035-8 · DOI
- 10.3102/0034654307310317 · DOI
- Sfard A, 2003, A research companion for NCTM standards, 353
- Shavelson RJ, 1991, Generalizability theory: A primer, 1
- Sherin MG, 1996, The nature and dynamics of teachers’ content knowledge
- Shuell T, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 726
- Shulman LS, 1996, Handbook of educational psychology, 399
- 10.2307/749346 · DOI
- 10.1080/03057640701372426 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312027004639 · DOI
- 10.1080/002202797183928 · DOI
- Stigler J, 2004, Educational Leadership, 61, 12
- 10.3102/00028312032002227 · DOI
- 10.2307/749683 · DOI
- 10.2307/749194 · DOI
- 10.2307/749339 · DOI
- Tymms P, 2004, But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research, 55
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Policy Planning and Innovation, 2003, Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The Secretary’s second annual report on teacher quality
- U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, 2006, The secretary’s fifth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom
- Vosniadou S, 2005, Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends Fifteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte, 55
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.014 · DOI
- Walberg HJ, 2000, Effective educational practices
- 10.3102/0034654308320292 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543063003249 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543073001089 · DOI · Paper page
- Wilson SM, 2003, Creating effective teachers: Concise answers for hard questions
- Winship C, 2007, Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research
- Wu ML, 1997, ConQuest: Generalized item response modelling software manual
- Zeichner KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 645
- Zumwalt KM, 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, 157
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032583 · Cited by 1,553
Self-citationHow teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis.
Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032198 · Cited by 853
“, cognitive activation, classroom management, and individual learning support) have previously been shown to predict student outcomes (Baumert et al., 2010; Dubberke et al., 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDepaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.001 · Cited by 728
Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauß, S., & Baumert, J. (2012) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487112460398 · Cited by 641
“The findings for PCK are consistent with the particularly low performance of Germany’s nonacademictrack students on the Third International Mathematics and Science Study and PISA assessments—assuming that teachers’ PCK is a crucial prerequisite for student learning (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2005).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationGeneric dimensions of teaching quality: the German framework of Three Basic Dimensions
Praetorius, A., Klieme, E., Herbert, B., & Pinger, P. (2018) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4 · Cited by 817
“Challenging problems and questions—rather than repetitive tasks and narrow questions— should be used to stimulate cognitive conflicts, engage students in higher-level thinking processes, and support metacognition (Baumert et al. 2010; Lipowsky et al. 2009).”
BackgroundStudent ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001 · Cited by 703
“Our tests focused on knowledge and conceptual understanding of a specific teaching unit (short term effects), whereas other studies have focused on one-year effects on broader constructs, such as mathematics literacy (Baumert et al., 2010; Dubberke et al., 2008) or the understanding of the nature of science (Fraser &…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSeidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009 · Cited by 509
“Professional development with mathematics teachers, for example, focuses on mathematics tasks and problems, which serve as a vehicle for exploring students’ mathematical thinking and problem-solving and how teachers can guide these processes (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundHuber, S. G., & Helm, C. (2020) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-020-09322-y · Cited by 507
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A.-T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882 · Cited by 484
“This basic idea forms the foundation of several recent studies on different aspects of professional competence such as teachers’ knowledge (Baumert et al., 2010; Förtsch, Werner, von Kotzebue, & Neuhaus, 2016; Keller, Neumann, & Fischer, 2016), professional beliefs (Kleickmann, Vehmeyer, & Mö ler, 2010; Kunter et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationRichter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2011) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.008 · Cited by 475
Self-citationModeling and Measuring the Structure of Professional Vision in Preservice Teachers
Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2014) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831214531321 · Cited by 473
“In line with Shulman’s ideas, some approaches have focused on providing empirical evidence for the proposed structure of teacher knowledge (Baumert et al., 2010; Hill, Rowan, & Ball, 2005; Voss et al., 2011).”
BackgroundVoss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025125 · Cited by 464
“Direct measures of teachers’ domain-specific knowledge—that is, their content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge—have now been developed (Baumert et al., 2010; De Jong, Van Driel, & Verloop, 2005; Hill, Schilling, & Ball, 2004; Krauss et al., 2008; Schmidt et al., 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831213477680 · Cited by 455
“Moreover, studies that rigorously investigate the relationship between the different kinds of teacher knowledge and student gains in understanding of science are rare (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundTeacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity
Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.07.001 · Cited by 405
Self-citationDignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0 · Cited by 403
“…as well as students’ engagement with the learning content (e.g., Hiebert et al. 1997) by exploring and building on students’ prior knowledge, by stimulating cognitive conflict, by activating higher-order thinking processes, and by fostering students’ metacognition (e.g., Baumert et al. 2010).”
BackgroundMeasuring Teachers’ enjoyment, anger, and anxiety: The Teacher Emotions Scales (TES)
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R. H., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Durksen, T. L., Becker-Kurz, B., & Klassen, R. M. (2016) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.003 · Cited by 479
“Specifically, we included scales related to three commonly agreed upon basic dimensions of teaching quality, namely, cognitive quality, effective classroom management, and supportive climate (e.g. Baumert et al., 2010; Klieme, Pauli, & Reusser, 2009; Pianta & Hamre, 2009).”
BackgroundKlusmann, U., Richter, D., & Lüdtke, O. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000125 · Cited by 381
Self-citationTeacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement
Gess‐Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. M. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158 · Cited by 491
Burić, I., & Kim, L. E. (2020) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101302 · Cited by 479
Lauermann, F., & König, J. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.06.006 · Cited by 432
Krauß, S., Baumert, J., & Blum, W. F. (2008) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-008-0141-9 · Cited by 278
Self-citationOne lesson is all you need? Stability of instructional quality across lessons
Praetorius, A., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.002 · Cited by 354
“Studies using external observer ratings, such as Baumert et al. (2010) and Lipowsky et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAssessment of teacher knowledge across countries: a review of the state of research
Blömeke, S., & Delaney, S. (2012) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0429-7 · Cited by 309
“Baumert et al., 2010). More data on MPCK would be urgently needed then. Furthermore, Hsieh, Lin and Wang (in this issue) would prefer an assessment of teacher knowledge as conceptualized by Niss (2003) who emphasized the fundamental characteristics of mathematical thinking across the content”
BackgroundMethodKeller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2016) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21378 · Cited by 373
Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., & Sailer, M. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552 · Cited by 410
“For instance, Baumert et al. (2010) showed in a longitudinal study that the objectively measured PCK of teachers can explain class variance in mathematics achievement reasonably well (R 2 = 39%).”
BackgroundQuality Teaching of Mathematical Modelling: What Do We Know, What Can We Do?
Blum, W. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_9 · Cited by 280
“…teaching on learning teacher competencies ! quality teaching ! student learning; the COACTIV project has shown, for a representative sample of German secondary mathematics teachers, that subject-related teacher competencies have a strong influence on students’ performance (see Baumert et al. 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDumont, H., Trautwein, U., Nagy, G., & Nagengast, B. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034100 · Cited by 320
Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession
Guerreiro, S. (2017) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/9789264270695-en · Cited by 277
“In this manner, Voss, Kunter and Baumert’s (2011) model is similar to those of Slavin (1984) and Carroll (1963) where students and teachers are considered interconnected and interdependent in the teaching and learning process. According to Voss, Kunter and Baumert (2011), their model is domain-general and necessary fo…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOpening up the black box: Teacher competence, instructional quality, and students’ learning progress
Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Ross, N., Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2022) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101600 · Cited by 394
“student achievement have rarely been examined: we identified one study where a significant medium (according to Cohen, 1988; see this reference also in the following for categorization of effect sizes) effect was found for German lower-secondary mathematics teachers (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundKönig, J. A., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2014) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.004 · Cited by 273
Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in U.S. schools
Torres, D. G. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education : An International Journal of Research and Studies · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.001 · Cited by 258
Stahnke, R., Schueler, S., & Rösken-Winter, B. (2016) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0775-y · Cited by 326
Stürmer, K., Könings, K., & Seidel, T. (2013) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02075.x · Cited by 245
“Research in the domain of content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge has shown that deep theoretical and conceptual knowledge is a decisive condition of successful teaching in terms of student learning (Ball & Cohen, 1999; Baumert et al., 2010); the same holds for a teacher’s ability to observe and interpret…”
BackgroundDettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Pekrun, R. H. (2010) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.001 · Cited by 264
“At t2, math ematics achievement was assessed by a test developed to cover the standard content stipulated in the federal states' curricula for grade 10 students (Baumert et al., 2010).”
MethodInfluentialBlomberg, G., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2011) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.008 · Cited by 241
“Clearly, the relevant subject-specific knowledge differs considerably depending on the characteristics of the subject in question (Baumert et al., 2009; Wilson, Shulman, & Richert, 1987).”
BackgroundSchiefele, U., & Schaffner, E. (2015) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.005 · Cited by 271
König, J., Blömeke, S., Paine, L. W., Schmidt, W. H., & Hsieh, F.-J. (2011) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487110388664 · Cited by 246
“1Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany 2Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA 3National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan Corresponding Author: Johannes König, Humboldt University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany Email: johannes.koenig@staff.hu-berlin.de The growing body of resea…”
BackgroundInfluentialVariability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility!
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159 · Cited by 312
Meschede, N., Fiebranz, A., Möller, K., & Steffensky, M. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.010 · Cited by 283
Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2010) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018453 · Cited by 236
Self-citationTeaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual Framework
Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018) · OECD Education Working Papers · doi:10.1787/799337c2 · Cited by 219
The Nature and Predictors of Elementary Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching
Hill, H. C. (2010) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.41.5.0513 · Cited by 173
Effective Teacher Professional Development: New Theory and a Meta-Analytic Test
Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O’Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Goodrich, J., Herwegen, J. V., & Anders, J. (2023) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543231217480 · Cited by 383
“Empirical research has illuminated the many ways in which this knowledge influences their practice (Baumert et al., 2010; Campbell et al., 2014; Carpenter et al., 1989; Franke et al., 2001; Hill et al., 2008; Kersting et al., 2012; Sadler et al., 2013) and measures of teachers’ knowledge have been…”
Sailer, M., Schultz-Pernice, F., & Fischer, F. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106794 · Cited by 299
Depaepe, F., & König, J. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.003 · Cited by 251
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., & Scheiter, K. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101300 · Cited by 252
Lazarides, R., Gaspard, H., & Dicke, A. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.012 · Cited by 231
Bertschy, F., David, C. K., & Lehmann, M. (2013) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su5125067 · Cited by 280
“On the other hand, Baumert and Kunter‘s [20,25] model is explicitly designed as a generic model, which lends itself for specification and concretization, which has proven itself in studies on action competence of teachers and which can show empirical evidence [36].”
BackgroundCampbell, P. F., Nishio, M., Smith, T., Clark, L. M., Conant, D. L., Rust, A. H., DePiper, J. N., Frank, T. J., Griffin, M. J., & Choi, Y. (2014) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0419 · Cited by 219
“In an investigation of teacher knowledge involving experienced Grade 10 mathematics teachers in Germany, Baumert et al. (2010) empirically distinguished teachers’ knowledge of mathematics content and pedagogy in an open-ended assessment.”
BackgroundTeacher self-efficacy as a long-term predictor of instructional quality in the classroom
Künsting, J., Neuber, V., & Lipowsky, F. (2016) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0272-7 · Cited by 203
“Pianta and Hamre 2009) that can be regarded as crucial for students’ learning (Baumert et al. 2010; Klieme et al. 2009; Lipowsky et al. 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPark, D., Gunderson, E. A., Tsukayama, E., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000064 · Cited by 185
Hachfeld, A., Hahn, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., & Kunter, M. (2015) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.001 · Cited by 247
Self-citationLazarides, R., & Buchholz, J. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.01.001 · Cited by 219
Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.012 · Cited by 220
“Baumert et al. (2010) found evidence for the hypothesis that CK forms the prerequisite for PCK in the domain of mathematics.”
BackgroundInfluentialBaier‐Mosch, F., Decker, A., Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Klusmann, U., & Kunter, M. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12256 · Cited by 238
Self-citationBlömeke, S., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6437-8_5 · Cited by 166
Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., Kaiser, G., & Dohrmann, M. (2012) · Advances in mathematics education · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6437-8_15 · Cited by 166
Woods, P. J., & Copur‐Gencturk, Y. (2023) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104415 · Cited by 217
König, J., Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Schlesinger, L., Felske, C., Musekamp, F., & Kaiser, G. (2021) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-020-10021-0 · Cited by 231
“Various studies—mainly from mathematics education—have provided evidence that these three dimensions are empirically separable and significantly influence student progress (e.g., Baumert et al., 2010; Kunter et al., 2013; Praetorius et al., 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialRelation of Student Achievement to the Quality of Their Teachers and Instructional Quality
Blömeke, S., Olsen, R. V., & Suhl, U. (2016) · IEA research for education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41252-8_2 · Cited by 231
“Even though the concept of instructional quality is understood differently by different researchers in the field of educational effectiveness research, there is agreement that it is a multidimensional construct (Baumert et al. 2010; Creemers and Kyriakides 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialJacob, R., Hill, H., & Corey, D. (2017) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2016.1273411 · Cited by 154
“Interest in these areas has been driven by current federal and state guidelines for mathematics instruction (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010; National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008), by prior research that has found consistent links between tea…”
BackgroundTracking Effects Depend on Tracking Type
Chmielewski, A., Dumont, H., & Trautwein, U. (2013) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831213489843 · Cited by 153
“On the other hand, it is widely known in the tracking literature that teachers in low tracks provide lower-level instruction (Baumert et al., 2010; Oakes, 1985) and have lower expectations of their students (Brophy, 1983), which in turn influences students’ own perceptions of their abilities (Good, 1987).”
BackgroundDepaepe, F., Torbeyns, J., Vermeersch, N., Janssens, D., Janssen, R., Kelchtermans, G., Verschaffel, L., & Dooren, W. V. (2015) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.009 · Cited by 185
“Therefore, we can conclude in line with Baumert et al. (2010) that CK is a necessary, although not sufficient condition for PCK.”
BackgroundInfluentialBecker, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027608 · Cited by 165
Self-citationStichwort Pädagogisches Wissen von Lehrkräften: Empirische Zugänge und Befunde
Voss, T., Kunina‐Habenicht, O., Hoehne, V., & Kunter, M. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-015-0626-6 · Cited by 206
Self-citationHolzberger, D., Philipp, A., & Kunter, M. (2014) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.001 · Cited by 144
Self-citationA Review of the Literature on Teacher Effectiveness and Student Outcomes
Burroughs, N. A., Gardner, J. A., Lee, Y., Guo, S., Touitou, I., Jansen, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2019) · IEA research for education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16151-4_2 · Cited by 235
“Positive associations between teacher content knowledge and student outcomes were also found in studies based in Germany (Baumert et al. 2010) and Peru (Metzler and Woessman 2012), and in a comparative study using Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) data…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKönig, J., & Pflanzl, B. (2016) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2016.1214128 · Cited by 148
“So far, important educational research studies have been conducted showing that teachers’ knowledge as part of their expertise and professional competence is related to effective teaching and the quality of instruction (e.g. Baumert et al. 2010; Hill et al. 2008).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEmbedded Formative Assessment and Classroom Process Quality
Decristan, J., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., Hochweber, J., Büttner, G., Fauth, B., Hondrich, A. L., Rieser, S., Hertel, S., & Hardy, I. (2015) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831215596412 · Cited by 163
“…in Europe (i.e., cognitive activation, supportive climate, and classroom management; Klieme, Pauli, & Reusser, 2009; for a similar model, see Baumert et al., 2010) and in the United States (i.e., instructional support, emotional support, and classroom organization (Pianta et al., 2008;…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationAnders, Y., Grosse, C., Rossbach, H., Ebert, S., & Weinert, S. (2013) · doi:10.1080/09243453.2012.749794 · Cited by 136
“Theories of instructional quality in school classrooms underline the impact of three dimensions of instructional quality: classroom management, supportive climate, and cognitive activation (e.g., Baumert et al., 2010; Klieme, Pauli, & Reusser, 2009).”
BackgroundTeaching Mathematics through Concept Motivation and Action Learning
Abramovich, S., Grinshpan, A., & Milligan, D. (2019) · Education Research International · doi:10.1155/2019/3745406 · Cited by 135
Teachers’ Professional Knowledge for Teaching English as a Foreign Language
König, J., Lammerding, S., Nold, G., Rohde, A., Strauß, S., & Tachtsoglou, S. (2016) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487116644956 · Cited by 147
“The studies that actually test teacher knowledge mainly focus on teachers of mathematics (Ball, Thames, & Phelps, 2008; Baumert et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2005; Schmidt et al., 2007; Tatto et al., 2012), thus enriching our understanding regarding mathematics as a core school subject worldwide (Organisation for Economi…”
BackgroundInfluentialJüttner, M., Boone, W. J., Park, S., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2013) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-013-9157-y · Cited by 141
“1999), there is agreement with respect to two critical aspects of PCK: knowledge of students’ understanding and knowledge of instructional strategies (Park and Oliver 2008; Baumert et al. 2010; Lee and Luft 2008; van Driel et al. 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialQualities of classroom observation systems
Bell, C. A., Dobbelaer, M., Klette, K., & Visscher, A. (2018) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2018.1539014 · Cited by 134
“classroom discussions, and other pedagogical strategies (Baumert et al., 2010; Osborne et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialKleickmann, T., Tröbst, S., Jonen, A., Vehmeyer, J., & Möller, K. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000041 · Cited by 146
Piwowar, V., Thiel, F., & Ophardt, D. (2012) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.09.007 · Cited by 147
Choi, M., Cristol, D., & Gimbert, B. G. (2018) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.005 · Cited by 130
Anders, Y., & Roßbach, H. (2015) · Journal of Research in Childhood Education · doi:10.1080/02568543.2015.1040564 · Cited by 133
“Most of the existing studies have focused on elementary school or secondary school teachers (Baumert et al., 2010; Blömeke & Delaney, 2012; Hill, Rowan, & Ball, 2005).”
BackgroundTatto, M. T., & Senk, S. L. (2011) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487110391807 · Cited by 102
“…knowledge considered most important for school mathematics teaching, but we know much less about the knowledge most important for teaching secondary school mathematics than for primary mathematics (see, e.g., Baumert et al., 2010; Hill, Sleep, Lewis, & Ball, 2007; Schmidt et al., 2007).”
BackgroundRelating Teacher PCK and Teacher Practice Using Classroom Observation
Barendsen, E., & Henze, I. (2019) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-017-9637-z · Cited by 125
Teaching strategies and differential effectiveness across learning contexts: Evidence from PISA 2012
Caro, D., Lenkeit, J., & Kyriakides, L. (2016) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.005 · Cited by 125
Schlesinger, L., & Jentsch, A. (2016) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-016-0765-0 · Cited by 146
“By doing so, cognitive activation was understood from a content-specific perspective with a focus and an emphasis on cognitively activating and mathematically demanding tasks (Baumert et al., 2010; Klieme et al., 2009; Lipowsky et al., 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialCharalambous, C. Y., & Hill, H. C. (2012) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2011.650215 · Cited by 137
“With only a few exceptions discussed below, most studies examining teacher knowledge kept the curriculum in the background—acknowledging its role, but not exploring its interaction with teacher knowledge in shaping instruction (e.g. Hill et al. 2008, Baumert et al. 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKulgemeyer, C., & Riese, J. (2018) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21457 · Cited by 157
Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Voss, T., & Baumert, J. (2012) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000078 · Cited by 144
Self-citationBrandt, N. D., Lechner, C. M., Tetzner, J., & Rammstedt, B. (2019) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12482 · Cited by 142
Competence Measurement in (Mathematics) Teacher Education and Beyond: Implications for Policy
Kaiser, G., & König, J. A. (2019) · Higher Education Policy · doi:10.1057/s41307-019-00139-z · Cited by 121
Gustafsson, J., Nilsen, T., & Hansen, K. Y. (2016) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.09.004 · Cited by 179
Connections Between Teachers’ Knowledge of Students, Instruction, and Achievement Outcomes
Hill, H. C., & Chin, M. J. (2018) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831218769614 · Cited by 169
“Instead, we care whether the construct itself, as measured by our instrument, is of importance to teaching and learning, similar to the approach Baumert et al. (2010) take with teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge.”
BackgroundVoss, T., Kleickmann, T., Kunter, M., & Hachfeld, A. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_12 · Cited by 140
Self-citationYang, X., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2020) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-020-01145-x · Cited by 147
Preservice Biology Teachers’ Professional Knowledge: Structure and Learning Opportunities
Großschedl, J., Harms, U., Kleickmann, T., & Glowinski, I. (2015) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9423-6 · Cited by 137
“As CK is regarded as a prerequisite for PCK development by many researchers (e.g., Ball, Hill, & Bass, 2005; Ma, 1999), the result of COACTIV could reflect a transfer effect of CK on PCK (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGuggemos, J., & Seufert, S. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106613 · Cited by 166
“Teachers ’ professional knowledge may become the focus point because it has been shown to be an important predictor for instructional quality (Baumert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundLongitudinal relations between teaching-related motivations and student-reported teaching quality
Praetorius, A.-K., Lauermann, F., Klassen, R. M., Dickhäuser, O., Janke, S., & Dresel, M. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.023 · Cited by 118
The relation between content-specific and general teacher knowledge and skills
Blömeke, S., Busse, A., Kaiser, G., König, J. A., & Suhl, U. (2016) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.003 · Cited by 112
“Furthermore, the results challenge the assumption that content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and general pedagogical knowledge are of the same nature (Bl€ omeke, Kaiser & Lehmann, 2010; Baumert et al., 2010; Shulman, 1987; Schoenfeld & Kilpatrick, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialYang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2022) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101225 · Cited by 131
Bradshaw, L. P., Izsák, A., Templin, J. L., & Jacobson, E. D. (2013) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/emip.12020 · Cited by 114
“Establishing links between teachers’ knowledge and students’ achievement eluded researchers for decades, but a few recent studies (e.g., Baumert et al., 2010; Hill, Rowan, & Ball, 2005) have done so using measures inspired by the knowledge categories Shulman (1986) discussed as necessary for…”
MethodScherer, R., Nilsen, T., & Jansen, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00110 · Cited by 130
“This measurement issue also limits meaningful comparisons that could shed light on how teaching effectiveness relates to educational systems and teacher education in multilevel settings (Baumert et al., 2010; Scherer and Gustafsson, 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialKaskens, J., Segers, E., Goei, S. L., Luit, J. E. H. V., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2020) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103096 · Cited by 160
What makes an expert teacher? Investigating teachers’ professional vision and discourse abilities
Lachner, A., Jarodzka, H., & Nückles, M. (2016) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9376-y · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- University of Kassel (DE)
- Bielefeld University (DE)
- Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-180
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1011
- OpenAlex
- W2141462352
- Cited by
- 2,100
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2026: 115 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 179 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 163 · 2016: 143 · 2015: 155 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 105 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 165.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Kobra (Universitätsbibliothek Kassel) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- pedagogical content knowledge, content knowledge, cognitive activation, learning gains, secondary mathematics instruction, teacher professional knowledge, mathematics teachers, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review