Cited by 17Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis

Evaluation of elevated urinary enolase I levels in patients with endometriosis

Open access
Yun, Bo Hyon, Lee, You Sun, Chon, Seung Joo, Jung, Yeon Soo, Yim, Su Youn, Kim, Hye Yeon, Park, Joo Hyun, Seo, Seok Kyo +3 more·2014·Biomarkers

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to validate and investigate the clinical value of urinary enolase I in patients with endometriosis. METHODS: Urine samples of 39 patients with histologically confirmed endometriosis and 20 patients without endometriosis were collected. Western blot analysis and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to detect the increase of enolase I in patients' urine. RESULTS: Urinary enolase I expression corrected for creatinine ratio (non neuronal enolase (NNE)-Cr) was significantly greater in patients with endometriosis (p = 0.026). When the diagnostic performance of NNE-Cr was evaluated with serum CA-125 combination, the area under the curve was 0.821 (95% confidence interval 0.713-0.928) with sensitivity and specificity of 76.9% and 85.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Elevated urinary enolase I, in conjunction with serum CA-125, may be used as a potential biomarker for endometriosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/1354750x.2013.863973

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enolase-1 lacked sufficient diagnostic power as an individual analyte (sensitivity 56% and specificity 72%) in a separate study.

    “Despite elevation in women with endometriosis, enolase-1 lacked sufficient diagnostic power as an individual analyte (sensitivity 56% and specificity 72%) in a separate study [108].”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [108]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yun, B. H., Lee, Y. S., Chon, S. J., Jung, Y. S., Yim, S. Y., Kim, H. Y., Park, J. H., Seo, S. K., Cho, S., Choi, Y. S., & Lee, B. S.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Cho, SiHyun
Venue
Biomarkers
Published
2013-11-28
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
16-21
ISSN
  • 1354-750X (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5804
OpenAlex
W2050558848
Cited by
17
References
41
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Biomarkers (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Keywords
endometriosis, CA125, diagnostic accuracy, serum biomarkers, urinary biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adult, Creatinine, DNA-Binding Proteins, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, ROC Curve, Biomarkers, Tumor, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, CA-125 Antigen, Tumor Suppressor Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review