Cited by 161Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementGynecological conditions and treatments

Non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis based on a combined analysis of six plasma biomarkers

Mihalyi, A., Gevaert, O., Kyama, C. M., Simsa, P., Pochet, N., De Smet, F., De Moor, B., Meuleman, C. +5 more·2010·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lack of a non-invasive diagnostic test contributes to the long delay between onset of symptoms and diagnosis of endometriosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combined performance of six potential plasma biomarkers in the diagnosis of endometriosis. METHODS: This case-control study was conducted in 294 infertile women, consisting of 93 women with a normal pelvis and 201 women with endometriosis. We measured plasma concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and cancer antigens CA-125 and CA-19-9. Analyses were done using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney test, receiver operator characteristic, stepwise logistic regression and least squares support vector machines (LSSVM). RESULTS: Plasma levels of IL-6, IL-8 and CA-125 were increased in all women with endometriosis and in those with minimal-mild endometriosis, compared with controls. In women with moderate-severe endometriosis, plasma levels of IL-6, IL-8 and CA-125, but also of hsCRP, were significantly higher than in controls. Using stepwise logistic regression, moderate-severe endometriosis was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 100% (specificity 84%) and minimal-mild endometriosis was detected with a sensitivity of 87% (specificity 71%) during the secretory phase. Using LSSVM analysis, minimal-mild endometriosis was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 94% (specificity 61%) during the secretory phase and with a sensitivity of 92% (specificity 63%) during the menstrual phase. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced statistical analysis of a panel of six selected plasma biomarkers on samples obtained during the secretory phase or during menstruation allows the diagnosis of both minimal-mild and moderate-severe endometriosis with high sensitivity and clinically acceptable specificity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/dep425

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mihalyi et al. showed the possibility of diagnosing minimal to mild endometriosis with a combination of cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TNF a, CA 125, CA-19-9, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) with 60%-71% specificity and 87%-92% sensitivity.

    “Mihalyi et al. showed the possibility of diagnosing minimal to mild endometriosis with the use of a combination of cytokines (interleukin [IL] 6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor [TNF] a, cancer antigen [CA] 125, CA-19-9, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) with 60%-71% specificity and 87%-92% sensitivity (114).”

    From Biomarkers in endometriosis: Challenges and opportunities (2017) · cites this paper as [114]

  • CA-125 combined with IL-8 and TNF-α in the secretory phase had sensitivity of 89.7% and specificity of 71.1%.

    “CA-125 combined with interleukin-8 (IL-8) and tumor necrosis factors-α (TNF-α) in the secretory phase had a sensitivity of 89.7% and specificity of 71.1% in a study performed by Mihalyi and coworkers [36].”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [36]

  • A panel of luteal plasma levels of IL-8, TNF-α, and CA-125 distinguished 201 women with endometriosis from 93 controls with a normal pelvis with sensitivity of 89.7% and specificity of 71.1%.

    “A study by Mihalyi et al. found a panel consisting of luteal plasma levels of IL-8, TNF-α, and CA-125 that was able to distinguish between 201 women with endometriosis and 93 controls with a normal pelvis with a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 71.1% [36].”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [36]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mihalyi, A., Gevaert, O., Kyama, C. M., Simsa, P., Pochet, N., De Smet, F., De Moor, B., Meuleman, C., Billen, J., Blanckaert, N., Vodolazkaia, A., Fulop, V., & D'Hooghe, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (BE)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2009-12-09
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
654-664
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2143886331
Cited by
161
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • KU Leuven
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
endometriosis, non-invasive diagnosis, plasma biomarkers, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, TNF-α, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, CA125, CA19-9, infertility, luteal phase, menstrual cycle phases, least squares support vector machine, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
C-Reactive Protein, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Biomarkers, Interleukin-6, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Interleukin-8, CA-125 Antigen, CA-19-9 Antigen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review