The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Hidden Impact of Conspiracy Theories: Perceived and Actual Influence of Theories Surrounding the Death of Princess Diana
Abstract
The authors examined the perceived and actual impact of exposure to conspiracy theories surrounding the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, in 1997. One group of undergraduate students rated their agreement and their classmates' perceived agreement with several statements about Diana's death. A second group of students from the same undergraduate population read material containing popular conspiracy theories about Diana's death before rating their own and others' agreement with the same statements and perceived retrospective attitudes (i.e., what they thought their own and others' attitudes were before reading the material). Results revealed that whereas participants in the second group accurately estimated others' attitude changes, they underestimated the extent to which their own attitudes were influenced.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Douglas and Sutton (2008) showed that people were effectively persuaded by proconspiracy material but were not aware that they had been persuaded and falsely recalled that their preexposure beliefs were identical to their new beliefs.”
From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Douglas and Sutton (2008)
In the citing paper
“Further, recent findings suggest that people tend to be persuaded by conspiracy theories they are exposed to without being aware of it [20].”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Psychologists are learning more about the traits and characteristics associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories more generally, such as mistrust, anomie, political cynicism and Machiavellianism [8], [20], [31], [50]”
From The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions (2014) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Psychometric theory (2nd ed.).
Sitgreaves, R. (1979) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/018882 · Cited by 14,384
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121 · Cited by 7,731
The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion.
Hamilton, V. L., & Lerner, M. J. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2067083 · Cited by 2,544
The Third-Person Effect in Communication
Davison, W. P. (1983) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/268763 · Cited by 1,967
Goertzel, T. (1994) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791630 · Cited by 1,094
Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known.
Hawkins, S. A., & Hastie, R. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.311 · Cited by 852
Hindsight-foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.
Fischhoff, B. (1974) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e459202004-001 · Cited by 814
Lipkusa, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296227002 · Cited by 555
Why people believe weird things: pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1839 · Cited by 413
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12568 · Cited by 1,511
“Douglas and Sutton (2008) corroborated these findings with respect to conspiracy theories about the death of Diana, Princess of Wales. They further investigated whether people were aware that their attitudes had changed as a result of exposure to conspiracy theories, finding that they were not. Research also suggests…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationThe Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417718261 · Cited by 1,316
“Douglas and Sutton (2008) showed that people were effectively persuaded by proconspiracy material but were not aware that they had been persuaded and falsely recalled that their preexposure beliefs were identical to their new beliefs.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 · Cited by 1,232
“Psychologists are learning more about the traits and characteristics associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories more generally, such as mistrust, anomie, political cynicism and Machiavellianism [8], [20], [31], [50], and it will be useful to know if the same, or different factors predict anti-vaccine conspiracy be…”
Self-citationBruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225 · Cited by 1,049
Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale
Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279 · Cited by 950
“…required to illuminate the psychology of conspiracist ideation, and the number of recent publications on the topic (e.g., Leman and Cinnirella, 2007; Douglas and Sutton, 2008, 2011; Bogart et al., 2010; Swami et al., 2010, 2011, 2013; Darwin et al., 2011; Newheiser et al., 2011; Swami, 2012; Wood…”
BackgroundConspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion
Oliver, J., & Wood, T. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12084 · Cited by 689
Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/1750698017701615 · Cited by 764
“Conspiracy theories also appear to influence people without their awareness (Douglas and Sutton, 2008).”
Self-citationJolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12018 · Cited by 685
Self-citationDead and Alive: Beliefs in Contradictory Conspiracy Theories
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611434786 · Cited by 660
“Crucially, there were 5 items regarding the death of Princess Diana (Douglas & Sutton, 2008, 2011; a ¼ .83): 1.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationLewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612457686 · Cited by 638
“Douglas and Sutton (2008) showed that after exposure to conspiracy theories about the death of Princess Diana, participants were demonstrably affected by those theories even when they tried to dismiss their influence.”
BackgroundSwami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x · Cited by 502
“Beginning in the early 1990s, psychologists began to examine the socio-cognitive bases of conspiracy theories (e.g., Butler, Koopman, & Zimbardo, 1995; Douglas & Sutton, 2008).”
BackgroundThe pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1720 · Cited by 527
Swami, V., Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1583 · Cited by 499
“It may also be fruitful to examine the sociocognitive changes that occur when exposed to conspiracist beliefs (e.g. Douglas & Sutton, 2008; Leman & Cinnirella, 2007).”
BackgroundPrevention is better than cure: addressing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2017) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12453 · Cited by 446
“…of malevolent groups, who cover up information to suit their own interests (Brotherton, 2015; Cichocka, Marchlewska, & Golec de Zavala, 2016; Douglas & Sutton, 2008, 2011, 2015; Douglas, Sutton, Callan, Dawtry, & Harvey, 2016; Goertzel, 1994; McCauley & Jacques, 1979; Sutton & Douglas,…”
MethodSelf-citationSomeone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J. (2016) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586 · Cited by 414
“…job’ (Swami, Chamorro-Premuzic & Furnham, 2010; Wood & Douglas, 2013), that Princess Diana was murdered by elements within the British establishment (Douglas & Sutton, 2008, 2011), that climate change is a hoax (Jolley & Douglas, 2014a; Lewandowsky, Oberauer & Gignac, 2013) and that Lee Harvey…”
BackgroundSelf-citation‘They will not control us’: Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies
Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., Golec de Zavala, A., & Olechowski, M. (2016) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12158 · Cited by 295
“Notable examples of such conspiracy theories include beliefs about involvement of the US government in the 9/11 attack or the English Royal Family in the death of Princes Diana (Wood, Douglas, & Sutton, 2012).”
Goreis, A., & Voracek, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205 · Cited by 333
The Effect of High-Anxiety Situations on Conspiracy Thinking
Grzesiak-Feldman, M. (2013) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-013-9165-6 · Cited by 287
“Kennedy (McHoskey 1995), through the death of Diana, Princess of Wales (Douglas and Sutton 2008) to the collapse of the World Trade Center (Fenster 2008).”
BackgroundUnderstanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism
Cichocka, A. (2016) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530 · Cited by 278
“Notable examples include conspiracy theories about the national representatives’ involvement in the deaths of Princes Diana or JFK (e.g., Douglas & Sutton, 2008).”
BackgroundJaiswal, J., LoSchiavo, C., & Perlman, D. C. (2020) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-020-02925-y · Cited by 276
Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality
van Prooijen, J., & Jostmann, N. B. (2013) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1922 · Cited by 403
“…to a growing body of research that is aimed at understanding under what conditions people endorse or question conspiracy theories (Crocker, Luhtanen, Broadnax, & Blaine, 1999; Douglas & Sutton, 2008, 2011; Kramer & Messick, 1998; McCauley & Jacques, 1979; Swami, Chamorro-Premuzic, & Furnham, 2010).”
BackgroundDouglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2011) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x · Cited by 261
“After exposure to conspiracy theories about the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, British participants were more inclined to endorse those theories, but thought that their beliefs had not changed (Douglas & Sutton, 2008).”
Self-citationSeepage: Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community
Lewandowsky, S., Орескес, Н., Risbey, J. S., Newell, B. R., & Smithson, M. J. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.013 · Cited by 281
“, that Princess Diana was killed by the British Secret Service) that they explicitly dismiss (Douglas and Sutton, 2008).”
BackgroundResultBeliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure
Leman, P. J., & Cinnirella, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00378 · Cited by 237
“Not only are beliefs in conspiracy theories widespread and on the increase (e.g., Goertzel, 1994; Swami et al., 2011), they are also prone to a third person effect whereby we feel others believe in conspiracy theories more than we do (Douglas and Sutton, 2008).”
BackgroundMeasuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Validation of a French and English Single-Item Scale
Lantian, A., Muller, D., Nurra, C., & Douglas, K. M. (2016) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.8 · Cited by 187
“These ideas refer directly to influential definitions of conspiracy belief (Douglas & Sutton, 2008; Keeley, 1999).”
BackgroundSelf-citationClimate change: Why the conspiracy theories are dangerous
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2015) · Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists · doi:10.1177/0096340215571908 · Cited by 211
“Further, research has shown that people can be influenced by exposure to conspiracy theories without being aware that they have been persuaded (Douglas and Sutton, 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409 · Cited by 194
“At the present time, questionnaire-based investigations of individual differences make up the bulk of the existing research, although experimental approaches are emerging (e.g., Douglas and Sutton, 2008; Jolley and Douglas, 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citation“I Know Things They Don’t Know!”: The Role of Need for Uniqueness in Belief in Conspiracy Theories
Lantian, A., Muller, D., Nurra, C., & Douglas, K. M. (2017) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000306 · Cited by 176
“Indeed, reference to secret plots is an inalienable dimension of what a conspiracy theory is really like (Douglas & Sutton, 2008; Keeley, 1999; Swami & Furnham, 2014).”
BackgroundJolley, D., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2018) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12404 · Cited by 170
“In previous work by Douglas and Sutton (2008), this manipulation has been shown to successfully increase belief in conspiracy theories.”
Beyond “Monologicality”? Exploring Conspiracist Worldviews
Franks, B., Bangerter, A., Bauer, M. W., Hall, M., & Noort, M. C. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00861 · Cited by 166
“…found to be somewhat responsive to circumstances: van Prooijen and Jostmann (2013) found that inducing uncertainty increased conspiracy belief, whilst exposure to specific CTs (e.g., concerning Princess Diana: Douglas and Sutton, 2008; and John F Kennedy: Butler et al., 1995) also increased it.”
BackgroundWhy conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2018) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428 · Cited by 114
“This manipulation was adapted from a study by Douglas and Sutton (2008), which was successful in increasing conspiracy beliefs.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationMarchlewska, M., Cichocka, A., Łozowski, F., Górska, P., & Winiewski, M. (2019) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2019.1586637 · Cited by 156
“We argue that such convictions function similarly to conspiracy beliefs, which can be defined as beliefs in secret plots by powerful and malevolent groups (e.g., Douglas & Sutton, 2008; Goertzel, 1994).”
BackgroundMarinthe, G., Brown, G., Delouvée, S., & Jolley, D. (2020) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12449 · Cited by 159
“Conspiracy theories develop around significant events, such as the death of Princess Diana, the 9/11 terrorist attacks, or the Zika virus (Douglas & Sutton, 2008; Klofstad et al., 2019; Swami et al., 2010; Wood, 2018).”
BackgroundMari, S., de Zúñiga, H. G., Suerdem, A. K., Hanke, K., Brown, G. P., Vilar, R., Boer, D., & Bilewicz, M. (2021) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12754 · Cited by 182
Moulding, R., Nix-Carnell, S., Schnabel, A., Nedeljkovic, M., Burnside, E. E., Lentini, A., & Mehzabin, N. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.060 · Cited by 115
Rumor Has It: The Adoption of Unverified Information in Conflict Zones
Greenhill, K. M., & Oppenheim, B. (2017) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqx015 · Cited by 143
Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories
Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139565417.018 · Cited by 142
Self-citationXiao, X., Borah, P., & Su, Y. (2021) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662521998025 · Cited by 175
“Adapted from previous studies (e.g. Cassino, 2016; Douglas et al., 2019; Douglas and Sutton, 2008), we presented participants with a list of five statements regarding general conspiracy beliefs.”
MethodPolitical paranoia and conspiracy theories
Swami, V., & Furnham, A. F. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139565417.016 · Cited by 136
“For example, Douglas and Sutton (2008) had participants read material containing conspiracy theories about Princess Diana’s death before rating their own and others’ agreement with the statements, as well as their perceived retrospective attitudes.”
BackgroundSuspicion in the workplace: Organizational conspiracy theories and work‐related outcomes
Douglas, K. M., & Leite, A. C. (2017) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12212 · Cited by 132
Self-citationAnxious attachment and belief in conspiracy theories
Green, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2018) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.023 · Cited by 108
“Conspiracy theories attribute significant social and political events to the actions of powerful and malicious groups (Douglas & Sutton, 2008; Goertzel, 1994; Uscinski & Parent, 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSapountzis, A., & Condor, S. (2013) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12015 · Cited by 126
Wood, M. (2017) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12231 · Cited by 80
Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews
Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00836 · Cited by 110
“These findings support the idea of a broad conspiracist worldview based on disbelief in mainstream or received narratives, and highlight the analysis of online communication as a potentially useful tool for gaining insight into the worldview and assumptions of the persuader.”
BackgroundSelf-citationChen, L., Zhang, Y., Young, R., Wu, X., & Zhu, G. (2020) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1751384 · Cited by 125
“Early conspiracy theories were often related to the political landscape (Douglas & Sutton, 2008; Issit, 2012), but healthrelated conspiracy theories have become increasingly common since the 1980s (Issit, 2012; Kalichma, 2009).”
BackgroundSacco, P. L., Ferilli, G., & Blessi, G. T. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10113923 · Cited by 131
“Examples abound, such as fake news and news manipulation and the consequent crisis of social “objectivity” [96], online bullying and shaming of people with different opinions and views [97], and the diffusion of pseudoscience [98] and conspiracy [99] theories.”
BackgroundOn the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs
Grimes, D. R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147905 · Cited by 106
“It is important to challenge such narratives, as not only are they detrimental to our health and well-being, current research suggests that exposure to conspiratorial beliefs can affect our perception of events to a greater degree than we are aware [57].”
BackgroundUnderstanding and Countering Misinformation About Climate Change
Cook, J. (2019) · Advances in media, entertainment and the arts (AMEA) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8535-0.ch016 · Cited by 108
Enders, A. M., Smallpage, S. M., & Lupton, R. (2018) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123417000837 · Cited by 103
Dieguez, S., Wagner-Egger, P., & Gauvrit, N. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615598740 · Cited by 87
“…hypotheses after major events are now familiar and are known as conspiracy theories, defined as unverified claims of conspiracy (i.e., a secret agreement between powerful individuals to enforce and hide a malevolent agenda) with sensationalistic implications (e.g., Douglas & Sutton, 2008).”
BackgroundLantian, A., Bagneux, V., Delouvée, S., & Gauvrit, N. (2021) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3790 · Cited by 124
Are conspiracy theories harmless?
Douglas, K. M. (2021) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2021.10 · Cited by 92
“Douglas and Sutton (2008) found similar results with respect to conspiracy theories about the death of Princess Diana.”
ResultSelf-citationRadnitz, S., & Underwood, P. (2015) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123414000556 · Cited by 71
Partisanship, Individual Differences, and News Media Exposure as Predictors of Conspiracy Beliefs
Hollander, B. A. (2017) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699017728919 · Cited by 90
“The list of popular conspiracy theories is long, impressive, and to some degree depressing, including stories surrounding the origins of AIDS (Parsons, Simmons, Shinhoster, & Kilburn, 1999; Simmons & Parsons, 2005), the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy (McCauley & Jacques, 1979; McHoskey, 1995), and the…”
BackgroundExamining conspiracist beliefs about the disappearance of Amelia Earhart
Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2012) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2012.697932 · Cited by 88
“Beginning in the 1990s, psychologists began to investigate the socio-cognitive bases of conspiracist ideation (e.g., Butler, Koopman, & Zimbardo, 1995; Douglas & Sutton, 2008).”
BackgroundFar-Right Online Radicalization: A Review of the Literature
Marwick, A. E., Clancy, B., & Furl, K. (2022) · doi:10.21428/bfcb0bff.e9492a11 · Cited by 78
Fong, A. A., Roozenbeek, J., Goldwert, D., Rathje, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220987596 · Cited by 82
“…circumstances of the death of prominent individuals and celebrities, such as the conspiracy that Princess Diana was murdered, that John F. Kennedy was assassinated by the CIA, or that rapper Tupac Shakur faked his own death (Douglas & Sutton, 2008; McCauley & Jacques, 1979; Quinn, 2002).”
BackgroundStoica, C. A., & Umbreș, R. (2020) · European Societies · doi:10.1080/14616696.2020.1823450 · Cited by 82
BLINDED BY THE LIES? Toward an integrated definition of conspiracy theories
Baden, C., & Sharon, T. (2020) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtaa023 · Cited by 71
Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M., Marchlewska, M., Cichocka, A. K., & Sutton, R. M. (2021) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12829 · Cited by 68
“Research has shown that conspiracy theories change people’s attitudes on important issues (Douglas & Sutton, 2008; see also Douglas & Sutton, 2018; Jolley, Mari, et al., 2020 for reviews).”
Self-citationRationality in Conspiracy Beliefs: The Role of Perceived Motive
Bost, P. R., & Prunier, S. G. (2013) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/17.04.pr0.113x17z0 · Cited by 65
“For example, some formulations of the Princess Diana assassination conspiracy allege that the British Secret Service was involved in her death, but are unclear on whether any benefi ts accrued to the alleged conspirators after the event ( Douglas & Sutton, 2008 ).”
BackgroundMethodMao, J., Yang, S., & Guo, Y. (2020) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12417 · Cited by 64
“…such as the destruction of interpersonal relationships (Douglas & Leite, 2017), reduction of environmental behaviours (Jolley & Douglas, 2014), and weakening in political participation (Douglas & Sutton, 2008), are far-reaching (Jolley, 2013; Jolley & Douglas, 2017; van Prooijen & Douglas, 2018).”
BackgroundCookson, D., Jolley, D., Dempsey, R. C., & Povey, R. C. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430221993907 · Cited by 60
“Douglas and Sutton (2008) demonstrated that exposure to conspiracy theories increases belief in them, which has been the foundation of subsequent research (e.g., Jolley & Douglas, 2014a, 2014b; Swami et al., 2011).”
BackgroundRabbit Hole Syndrome: Inadvertent, accelerating, and entrenched commitment to conspiracy beliefs
Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101462 · Cited by 60
Self-citationThe Implications of Fictional Media for Political Beliefs
Mulligan, K., & Habel, P. (2012) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x12453758 · Cited by 64
“Douglas and Sutton (2008) found that exposing participants to conspiratorial information about the death of Princess Diana changed perceptions of the causes of her fatal car”
BackgroundConspiracy theories and social movements studies: A research agenda
Bertuzzi, N. (2021) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12945 · Cited by 65
Human foibles or systemic failure—Lay perceptions of the 2008–2009 financial crisis
Leiser, D., Bourgeois‐Gironde, S., & Benita, R. (2010) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2010.02.013 · Cited by 56
“ Historia est magistra vitae ”? The impact of historical victimhood on current conspiracy beliefs
Pantazi, M., Gkinopoulos, T., Witkowska, M., Klein, O., & Bilewicz, M. (2020) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220968898 · Cited by 68
“Despite the intuitive widespread impression that the term conspiracy theory has a bad connotation leading to suppression of conspiracy explanations (Douglas & Sutton, 2008; Klein et al., 2015) and consideration of conspiracy beliefs as sources of social stigma (Lantian et al., 2018), a study by…”
BackgroundBiddlestone, M., Green, R., Douglas, K. M., Azevedo, F., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. K. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rxjqc · Cited by 55
Self-citationHow Believing Climate Change is a “Hoax” Shapes Climate Skepticism in the United States
Sarathchandra, D., & Haltinner, K. (2020) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2020.1855884 · Cited by 57
“For example, Jolley (2013) and Douglas and Sutton (2008) demonstrate that exposure to conspiracy theories can influence people’s perceptions in ways that align with said conspiracy and of which they are CONTACT Dilshani Sarathchandra dilshanis@uidaho.edu Supplemental data for this article can be…”
BackgroundBeyond belief: the social psychology of conspiracy theories and the study of ideology
Byford, J. T. (2014) · Open Research Online (The Open University) · doi:10.4324/9780203386088-12 · Cited by 51
Relations of Familiarity with Reasoning Strategies in Conspiracy Beliefs
Bost, P. R., Prunier, S. G., & Piper, A. J. (2010) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/07.09.17.pr0.107.5.593-602 · Cited by 49
“The accessibility of motive may help explain why conspiracy beliefs are easy to acquire (Douglas & Sutton, 2008) and difficult to extinguish (McHoskey, 1995).”
BackgroundIncidental news exposure and COVID-19 misperceptions: A moderated-mediation model
Borah, P., Su, Y., Xiao, X., & Lee, D. K. L. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107173 · Cited by 57
Marchlewska, M., Górska, P., Green, R., Szczepańska, D., Rogoza, M., Molenda, Z., & Michalski, P. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221139072 · Cited by 51
“This may explain its positive relationships with conspiracy beliefs (i.e., beliefs in secret plots by powerful and malevolent groups; Douglas & Sutton, 2008) and out-group hostility (Marchlewska, Cichocka, et al., 2019; Marchlewska, Górska, et al., 2022).”
BackgroundThe role of cognitive biases in conspiracy beliefs: A literature review
Gagliardi, L. (2023) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12604 · Cited by 57
“In a similar vein, Douglas and Sutton (2008) measured conspiracy beliefs about Princess Diana’s assassination in subjects who were asked to read popular CTs on the subject, finding a greater endorsement when compared to the control group who did not receive any information.”
Conspiratorial Narratives in Violent Political Actors’ Language
Baele, S. J. (2019) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x19868494 · Cited by 44
Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning
Simon, D., & Read, S. J. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231204579 · Cited by 47
“…are told that the U.S. government was complicit in the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center (Swami et al., 2010), Princess Diana was mur-dered (Douglas & Sutton, 2008), COVID-19 was a plot to enable Bill Gates to plant microchips in people’s bodies, and the 2020 presidential election was…”
Filkuková, P., Ayton, P., Rand, K., & Langguth, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588478 · Cited by 47
“Conspiracy theories tend to be associated with major events, epidemics, collective threats, and times of political instability (McHoskey, 1995; Grzesiak-Feldman, 2007; Douglas and Sutton, 2008; Sharp, 2008; Carey et al., 2020).”
BackgroundHarper, D. J. (2002) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v5i1.3437 · Cited by 41
Will the Real Conspiracy Please Stand Up: Sources of Post-Communist Democratic Failure
Marinov, N., & Popova, M. (2021) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592721001973 · Cited by 38
“Trust in existing political institutions is negatively correlated with belief in conspiracies in general (Darwin, Neave, and Holmes 2011; Douglas and Sutton 2008; Goertzel 2014; Sutton and Douglas 2014).”
BackgroundDetection of conspiracy propagators using psycho-linguistic characteristics
Giachanou, A., Ghanem, B., & Rosso, P. (2021) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551520985486 · Cited by 40
“In another study, Douglas and Sutton [36] showed that participants were affected by conspiracies regarding the death of Princess Diana even when they tried to discard the influence.”
BackgroundUnderstanding and Countering Misinformation About Climate Change
Cook, J. (2021) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3686-8.ch081 · Cited by 40
Reducing conspiracy theory beliefs
Stojanov, A. (2015) · Psihologija · doi:10.2298/psi1503251s · Cited by 30
“Douglas and Sutton (2011) found that projection mechanisms are also at work in conspiracy theory endorsement; hence, further research should explore the relations between Machiavellianism, the experiential/ intuitive system and conspiracy theory beliefs.”
BackgroundCaught in a networked collusion? Homogeneity in conspiracy-related discussion networks on YouTube
Röchert, D., Neubaum, G., Roß, B., & Stieglitz, S. (2021) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2021.101866 · Cited by 38
Social Media as Vehicle for Conspiracy Beliefs on COVID-19
Goreis, A., & Kothgassner, O. D. (2020) · Digital Psychology · doi:10.24989/dp.v1i2.1866 · Cited by 37
“…in confirmation bias – people being drawn to interpretations of evidence which are related to or support an existing hypothesis, belief, or expecta- Copyright 2020, Facultas, Vienna 37 Digital Psychology 2020, Volume 1, Issue 2 tion – thus further fostering these beliefs (Douglas & Sutton, 2008).”
BackgroundLamberty, P., Hellmann, J. H., & Oeberst, A. (2018) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.033 · Cited by 28
“To the best of our knowledge, however, the third postulated cognitive foundation of conspiracy theories, the hindsight bias, has not been the subject of empirical research yet (see Collins, 2012; Douglas & Sutton, 2008).”
BackgroundHow believing in brand conspiracies shapes relationships with brands
Lunardo, R., Oliver, M. A., & Shepherd, S. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113729 · Cited by 26
Hanley, H. W. A., Kumar, D., & Durumeric, Z. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610043 · Cited by 36
“Prior research has shown that mere exposure to conspiracy theories can unconsciously influence people to believe in them [27].”
BackgroundCombating Fake News on Social Media: A Framework, Review, and Future Opportunities
Nasery, M., Turel, O., & Yuan, Y. (2023) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.05335 · Cited by 33
Duran, N. D., Nicholson, S. P., & Dale, R. A. C. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.008 · Cited by 26
“People generally want to hold accurate beliefs (Kunda, 1990), yet political conspiracies, by their very nature, are based on unsubstantiated and often times dubious evidence (Douglas & Sutton, 2008; Kramer, 1998).”
BackgroundThe conspiratorial style in lay economic thinking
Leiser, D., Duani, N., & Wagner-Egger, P. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171238 · Cited by 24
Schemer, C., Ziegele, M., Schultz, T., Quiring, O., Jackob, N., & Jakobs, I. (2021) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990211063527 · Cited by 30
“Alternative news sites mostly provide partisan information mixed with conspiratorial ideas, which then can increase beliefs in conspiracy theories in their audience (Douglas & Sutton, 2008; Garrett et al., 2016; Stempel et al., 2007).”
BackgroundDoes Belief in Conspiracy Theories Affect Interpersonal Relationships?
Toribio‐Flórez, D., Green, R., Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2023) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/sjp.2023.8 · Cited by 24
“Previous research has shown that exposing people to conspiracy theories about the death of Princess Diana increased people’s agreement with such narratives, without them being aware (Douglas & Sutton, 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRepetition could increase the perceived truth of conspiracy theories
Béna, J., Rihet, M., Carreras, O., & Terrier, P. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02276-4 · Cited by 32
“In addition, such studies typically displayed only one overarching conspiracy theory – conspiracy statements that are thematically related (e.g., conspiracy theories of Princess Diana's death; Douglas & Sutton, 2008; Jolley & Douglas, 2014a).”
Daunt, K. L., Greer, D. A., Jin, H. S., & Orpen, I. (2023) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-07-2022-0565 · Cited by 33
Conspiracy theories in digital environments: Moving the research field forward
Zeng, J., Schäfer, M. S., & Oliveira, T. M. (2022) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565221117474 · Cited by 21
“In academic research, especially in the fi elds of philosophy (Clarke, 2002; Keeley, 1999; Pigden, 1995), social psychology (Douglas and Sutton, 2008; Leman and Cinnirella, 2007) and political science (Dean, 1998; Gray, 2008; Heins, 2007), conspiracy theories have been an established subject of…”
Górska, P., Marchlewska, M., Szczepańska, D., Molenda, Z., Michalski, P., & Furman, A. (2022) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2022.2111250 · Cited by 24
“Previously, conspiratorial predispositions were measured by general statements that did not mention any specific conspiracies or groups (Imhoff & Bruder, 2014) or by a set of items tapping on different specific conspiracy beliefs that were then averaged to form an index (Douglas & Sutton, 2008).”
Conspiracy theory beliefs in the adolescent population: A systematic review
Byrne, A., Martin, D., Jones, C., Galbraith, N. D., & Mercer, T. (2024) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12316 · Cited by 20
Mao, J., Zeng, Z., Yang, S., Guo, Y., & van Prooijen, J. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12924 · Cited by 20
5G, Religion, and Misconceptions in Communication during Covid-19 in Nigeria
Ndinojuo, B.-C. E. (2020) · Jurnal The Messenger · doi:10.26623/themessenger.v12i2.2282 · Cited by 21
“…conspiracy, and with the reach of the internet aided by social media and hashtags, conspiracies target specific vulnerable groups by reinforcing impressions about the nonexistence of the pandemic, thereby opening the mind to conspiracy theories unknowingly as argued by Douglas and Sutton (2008).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Kent (GB)
- Venue
- The Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 210-222
- ISSN
- 0022-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1183
- OpenAlex
- W2047390304
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, Princess Diana, perceived influence, attitude change, social influence
- MeSH terms
- Accidents, Traffic, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Death, England, Famous Persons, Female, Homicide, Humans, Deception, Male, Persuasive Communication, Psychological Theory, Public Opinion, Students, Wales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review