Cited by 92Misinformation and Its ImpactsParanormal Experiences and BeliefsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Are conspiracy theories harmless?

Open access
Douglas, Karen M.·2021·The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the consequences of conspiracy theories and the COVID–19 pandemic raised this interest to another level. In this article, I will outline what we know about the consequences of conspiracy theories for individuals, groups, and society, arguing that they are certainly not harmless. In particular, research suggests that conspiracy theories are associated with political apathy, support for non-normative political action, climate denial, vaccine refusal, prejudice, crime, violence, disengagement in the workplace, and reluctance to adhere to COVID–19 recommendations. In this article, I will also discuss the challenges of dealing with the negative consequences of conspiracy theories, which present some opportunities for future research.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This article argues that conspiracy theories are not harmless, summarizing evidence linking them to negative individual, group, and societal outcomes. It also outlines challenges for countering conspiracy theories and suggests future research on trusted messengers, inoculation, and addressing underlying psychological needs.

Key findings

  • Conspiracy theories are associated with political apathy and reduced political engagement: after reading anti-government conspiracy theories, people were less inclined to vote; after viewing the film *JFK*, people were less likely to want to engage in politics; and those with a general conspiracy tendency were less likely to register to vote, donate to a campaign, or display political signs.
  • They are linked to extremism, crime, and violence: conspiracy theorizing was prevalent in online extremist groups and described as a “radicalizing multiplier” (p. 4); conspiracy beliefs were linked to violent extremist intentions, nonnormative protests, illegal building occupations, greater willingness to conspire, more relaxed gun attitudes, and everyday small crimes such as running red lights and paying cash to avoid taxation.
  • They are linked to climate denial, science rejection, health risks, workplace disengagement, and COVID-19 noncompliance: anti-vaccine conspiracy beliefs significantly decreased vaccination intentions; Oliver and Wood (2014) found in U.S. nationally representative samples that over half of the population believes in one health-related conspiracy theory; COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs were associated with lower perceived threat, less preventive action, vaccine refusal, and willingness to vandalize 5G phone masts or engage in violence.
  • They are associated with prejudice and discrimination: belief in anti-Jewish conspiracy theories was associated with anti-Israeli attitudes and racism toward Chinese people; exposure to anti-Jewish conspiracy theories predicted prejudice and discrimination toward Jews and also toward groups not part of the alleged conspiracy, such as Americans, Asians, and Arabs.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review/overview article; the author summarizes existing psychological and social science research on the consequences of conspiracy theories.
  • Data or sample: Not stated in the paper; no primary data, sample, or systematic search strategy is described.
  • Main analysis: narrative synthesis of cited studies, including experiments, surveys, and qualitative research; no formal meta-analysis or statistical analysis is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states that dealing with conspiracy theories is difficult because they are nebulous and often unfalsifiable, believers are typically very committed, and counterarguments from governments or official sources may be resisted as coming from “outgroups.”
  • The paper notes that some theorists argue for positive outcomes of conspiracy theories, but states that these seem heavily outweighed by negative consequences studied more comprehensively.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search strategy, effect sizes, or primary data; many cited findings are correlational or experimental but are not quantitatively synthesized here.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/sjp.2021.10

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 55 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Interpretationnone given

    Conspiracy theories are associated with climate denial.

    “research suggests that conspiracy theories are associated with political apathy, support for non-normative political action, climate denial, vaccine refusal, prejudice, crime, violence, disengagement in the workplace, and reluctance to adhere to COVID-19 recommendations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning

    Conspiracy theories are not harmless; they bring significant and damaging consequences for individuals, groups, and society.

    “In this article, I will outline what we know about the consequences of conspiracy theories for individuals, groups, and society, arguing that they are certainly not harmless.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “However, conspiracy theories like these are not harmless-instead, they bring with them significant and damaging consequences.”
    • Also stated in: § <H2> Conclusions · plain
      “Conspiracy theories are associated with a range of negative consequences for political engagement, political behavior, climate engagement, trust in science, vaccine uptake, civic behavior, work-related behavior, intergroup relations, and more recently the COVID-19 response.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationcitation

    Conspiracy theories are associated with political apathy.

    “research suggests that conspiracy theories are associated with political apathy, support for non-normative political action, climate denial, vaccine refusal, prejudice, crime, violence, disengagement in the workplace, and reluctance to adhere to COVID-19 recommendations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationnone given

    Conspiracy theories are associated with support for non-normative political action.

    “research suggests that conspiracy theories are associated with political apathy, support for non-normative political action, climate denial, vaccine refusal, prejudice, crime, violence, disengagement in the workplace, and reluctance to adhere to COVID-19 recommendations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationnone given

    Conspiracy theories are associated with vaccine refusal.

    “research suggests that conspiracy theories are associated with political apathy, support for non-normative political action, climate denial, vaccine refusal, prejudice, crime, violence, disengagement in the workplace, and reluctance to adhere to COVID-19 recommendations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 11
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People with a general tendency toward conspiracy theories are less inclined to register to vote, donate to a political campaign, or display political signs.

    “Furthermore, people who show a general tendency toward conspiracy theories are less inclined to register to vote, donate to a political campaign, or display political signs outside their homes (Uscinski & Parent, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Uscinski & Parent, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People who read about climate change conspiracy theories felt powerless, uncertain, and disillusioned, and were in turn less inclined to take climate action.

    “Specifically, people who read about climate change conspiracy theories felt powerless, uncertain, and disillusioned, and were in turn less inclined to take climate action.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jolley and Douglas, 2014b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Belief in anti-Jewish conspiracy theories is associated with anti-Israeli attitudes and racism towards Chinese people.

    “Belief in anti-Jewish conspiracy theories was associated with anti-Israeli attitudes but also racism towards Chinese people.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Swami, 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The relationship between conspiracy beliefs and violent extremist intentions is stronger for individuals with low self-control, weaker law-related morality, and higher self-efficacy.

    “Specifically, these relationships were stronger for individuals who have low self-control, have weaker morality when it comes to the law, but score higher in self-efficacy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rottweiler and Gill, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Climate denial is prominent in the U.S. and is linked to conspiracy beliefs such as the idea that climate change is a hoax fabricated by climate scientists to win research funding.

    “Climate denial is prominent in the U.S. (Uscinski et al., 2017) and is linked to conspiracy beliefs such as the idea that climate change is a hoax fabricated by climate scientists to win research funding (Douglas & Sutton, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Uscinski et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Douglas & Sutton, 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Exposure to anti-Jewish conspiracy theories predicts prejudice and discrimination toward Jews, and prejudice toward groups not part of the alleged conspiracy (Americans, Asians, Arabs).

    “In experimental studies, Jolley et al. (2020) found that exposure to anti-Jewish conspiracy theories predicted prejudice and discrimination toward Jews, but also prejudice toward groups who were not part of the alleged conspiracy, such as Americans, Asians, and Arabs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jolley et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many other conspiracy theories express mistrust in science and rejection of scientific findings; conspiracy beliefs have been linked to negative attitudes about genetically modified food, vaccination, the origins of the AIDS virus, forensic evidence about the 9/11 attacks, and beliefs about the origins of COVID-19.

    “Many other conspiracy theories express mistrust in science and rejection of scientific findings.For example, conspiracy beliefs have been linked to negative attitudes about genetically modified food, vaccination, the origins of the AIDS virus, forensic evidence about the 9/11 attacks, and beliefs about the origins of COVID-19 (see also Rutjens et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rutjens et al., 2017

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Believers in health-related conspiracy theories are less likely to trust medical professionals and more likely to look elsewhere (e.g., alternative medicines) for treatment.

    “They further found that believers were less likely to trust medical professionals and were more likely to look elsewhere (e.g., alternative medicines) for treatment (see also Lamberty & Imhoff, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Oliver and Wood, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lamberty & Imhoff, 2018

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories in the U.S. is associated with lower perceived threat of the pandemic, less likelihood of taking preventive action (e.g., wearing a mask), and refusal of a vaccine if one became available.

    “For example, Romer and Jamieson (2020) found that belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories in the U.S. was associated with lower perceived threat of the pandemic, less likelihood of taking preventive action (e.g., wearing a mask), and refusal of a vaccine if one became available.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Romer and Jamieson, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories is associated with willingness to engage in vandalism of 5G phone masts and violence more generally.

    “Other negative consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy theories include willingness to engage in vandalism of 5G phone masts and violence more generally (Jolley & Paterson, 2020)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jolley & Paterson, 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    People who believe in conspiracy theories are typically very committed to their beliefs, which are often driven by political attitudes and beliefs associated with important group memberships.

    “People who believe in conspiracy theories are also typically very committed to their beliefs, which are often driven by political attitudes and beliefs associated with important group memberships (Uscinski et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Uscinski et al., 2016

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Pre-exposure warnings can let people know that future information is intended to mislead them.

    “A related strategy may be to present people with pre-exposure warnings to let people know that there is a possibility that future information is intended to mislead them (Lewandowsky et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lewandowsky et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

12 of 12

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Political conspiracy theories and misinformation can affect voting decisions, health-related conspiracy theories can influence people's medical choices (e.g. vaccination), and misinformation and conspiracy theories can fuel conflict between groups.

    “Moreover, political conspiracy theories and misinformation can affect voting decisions, health-related conspiracy theories can influence people's medical choices (e.g. vaccination), and misinformation and conspiracy theories can fuel conflict between groups (29, 30).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Rutjens citation year differs from reference

    Minor

    The in-text citation gives 2017, while the corresponding reference is dated 2018.

  • Einstein and Glick citation year differs from reference

    Minor

    The in-text citation gives 2013, while the corresponding reference is dated 2015.

  • Climate-change finding cites the anti-vaccine paper

    Minor

    The text attributes the carbon-footprint finding to Jolley and Douglas (2014b), but the reference list identifies 2014b as the anti-vaccine paper and 2014a as the paper about reducing one's carbon footprint.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bartlett, 2010, The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douglas, K. M.
Affiliations
University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Douglas, Karen M.
Venue
The Spanish Journal of Psychology
Published
2021
Volume
24
Pages
e13-e13
ISSN
  • 1138-7416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1988-2904
OpenAlex
W3124119606
Cited by
92
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10
FWCI
23.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Spanish Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
conspiracy theories, political apathy, climate change denial, vaccine refusal, prejudice, violence, social harm
MeSH terms
Vaccination Refusal, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Attitude, Attitude to Health, Communicable Disease Control, Crime, Culture, Denial, Psychological, Humans, Personnel Loyalty, Politics, Prejudice, Violence, Health Behavior, Guideline Adherence, Climate Change, Apathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review