Cited by 295Social and Intergroup PsychologyMisinformation and Its ImpactsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

‘They will not control us’: Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies

Open access
Cichocka, Aleksandra, Marchlewska, Marta, Golec de Zavala, Agnieszka, Olechowski, Mateusz·2016·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

This research examined the role of different forms of positive regard for the ingroup in predicting beliefs in intergroup conspiracies. Collective narcissism reflects a belief in ingroup greatness contingent on others’ recognition. We hypothesized that collective narcissism should be especially likely to foster outgroup conspiracy beliefs. Non‐narcissistic ingroup positivity, on the other hand, should predict a weaker tendency to believe in conspiracy theories. In Study 1, the endorsement of conspiratorial explanations of outgroup actions was positively predicted by collective narcissism but negatively by non‐narcissistic ingroup positivity. Study 2 showed that the opposite effects of collective narcissism and non‐narcissistic ingroup positivity on conspiracy beliefs were mediated via differential perceptions of threat. Study 3 manipulated whether conspiracy theories implicated ingroup or outgroup members. Collective narcissism predicted belief in outgroup conspiracies but not in ingroup conspiracies, while non‐narcissistic ingroup positivity predicted lower conspiracy beliefs, regardless of them being ascribed to the ingroup or the outgroup.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjop.12158

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Muthén, L. L., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus User's Guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  2. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837. doi: 10.1037/0022- 3514.85.5.823 · DOI
  3. Mason, D. S. (1995). Justice, socialism, and participation in the postcommunist states . In J. R. Kluegel, D. S. Mason & B. Wegener (Eds.), Social justice and political change. Public opinion in capitalist and post-communist states (pp. 49-80). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cichocka, A., Marchlewska, M., Golec de Zavala, A., & Olechowski, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • University of Warsaw (PL)
  • Department of Psychology University of Social Sciences and Humanities Poznań Poland
Corresponding author
Cichocka, Aleksandra
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10-28
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
556-576
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W1872162015
Cited by
295
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5
FWCI
30.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repositório do ISCTE-IUL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki (DEC‐2011/01/B/HS6/04637)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
collective narcissism, conspiracy beliefs, conspiracy theories, intergroup relations, social identity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Group Processes, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Social Identification, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review