Cited by 287Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The Effect of High-Anxiety Situations on Conspiracy Thinking

Grzesiak-Feldman, Monika·2013·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-013-9165-6

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People are likely to turn to conspiracy theories when they are anxious.

    “Studies have shown that people are likely to turn to conspiracy theories when they are anxious (Grzesiak-Feldman, 2013)”

    From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Grzesiak-Feldman, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grzesiak-Feldman, M.
Affiliations
University of Warsaw (PL)
Corresponding author
Grzesiak-Feldman, Monika
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2013-01-26
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
100-118
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W2041615716
Cited by
287
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Uniwersytet Warszawski
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
conspiracy beliefs, anxiety, state anxiety, trait anxiety, situational factors, threat processing, pre-exam anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review