Cited by 71Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Immunohistochemical Visualization of Amyloid-β Protein Precursor and Amyloid-β in Extra- and Intracellular Compartments in the Human Brain

Open access
Aho, Leena, Pikkarainen, Maria, Hiltunen, Mikko, Leinonen, Ville, Alafuzoff, Irina·2010·Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Abstract

Amyloid-beta (Abeta) peptide, a cleavage product of the amyloid-beta protein precursor (AbetaPP), has been reported to be detected in the intracellular compartment. Most studies reporting the presence of intracellular Abeta are based on the use of immunohistochemistry. In this study, the presence of AbetaPP and Abeta was assessed by applying immunohistochemistry in postmortem human brain tissue samples obtained from 10 neurologically intact subjects, the youngest being 2 years of age, one aged with mild cognitive impairment, 14 neurologically diseased, and in one brain biopsy sample obtained from a subject with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Intracellular immunoreactivity was detected in all ages independent of the disease state or existence of extracellular Abeta aggregates with all antibodies directed to AbetaPP, with three Abeta antibodies (4G8, 6E10, and 82E1), clones that are unable to distinguish Abeta from AbetaPP. These results suggest that it is AbetaPP rather than Abeta that is detected intracellularly when using the antibodies listed above. Furthermore, the staining results varied when different pretreatment strategies were applied. Interestingly intracellular Abeta was detected with antibodies directed to the C-terminus of Abeta (neoepitope) in subjects with Alzheimer's disease. The lack of intracellular immunoreactivity in unimpaired subjects, when using antibodies against neoepitopes, may be due to a lack or a low level of the protein that is thus undetectable at light microscopic level by immunohistochemistry method. The staining results and conclusions depended strongly on the chosen antibody and the pretreatment strategy and thus multiple antibodies must be used when assessing the intracellular accumulation of Abeta.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-2010-091681

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The discrepancy in intraneuronal Aβ levels in 3xTg mice might be due to APP cross-reacting antibodies such as 6E10 or 4G8, which detect central Aβ epitopes and also pick up full-length APP, resulting in overestimation of effective intraneuronal Aβ levels in the hippocampus.

    “This discrepancy to the abovementioned data in models with intraneuronal Aβ accumulation might be due to the use of APP cross-reacting antibodies (such as 6E10 or 4G8), which have been frequently used for Aβ labelling [111]. As these antibodies detect central Aβ epitopes, they usually also pick-up considerable levels of full-length APP, resulting in an overestimation of the effective intraneuronal”

    From Neuron Loss in Alzheimer’s Disease: Translation in Transgenic Mouse Models (2020) · cites this paper as [111]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aho, L., Pikkarainen, M., Hiltunen, M., Leinonen, V., & Alafuzoff, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Alafuzoff, Irina
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2010-06-13
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
1015-1028
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W1558118820
Cited by
71
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (LSHM-CT-2004-503039)
  • Academy of Finland (5772708)
  • Suomen Kulttuurirahasto
  • Kuopion Yliopistollinen Sairaala (5772708)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid-beta, amyloid precursor protein
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amino Acid Sequence, Antibodies, Biopsy, Brain Chemistry, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Extracellular Space, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Infant, Middle Aged, Molecular Sequence Data, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Intracellular Space, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review