Cited by 38Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

An integrated framework for the role of oxytocin in multistage social decision‐making

Open access
Piva, Matthew, Chang, Steve W.C.·2018·American Journal of Primatology

Abstract

Interest in the effects of oxytocin on social behavior has persisted even as an overarching theory describing these effects has remained largely elusive. Some of the earliest studies on the effects of oxytocin on social decision‐making indicated that oxytocin might enhance prosocial actions directed toward others. This led to development of the prosocial hypothesis, which stipulates that oxytocin specifically enhances prosocial choices. However, further work indicated that oxytocin administration could elicit antisocial behaviors as well in certain social situations, highlighting the importance of context‐dependent effects. At least two prominent hypotheses have been used to explain these seemingly contradictory findings. The social salience hypothesis indicates that the effects of oxytocin can be conceptualized as a general increase in the salience of social stimuli in the environment. Distinctly, the approach/withdrawal hypothesis stipulates that oxytocin enhances approach behaviors and decreases withdrawal behaviors. These phenomenologically motivated hypotheses regarding the effects of oxytocin on social behavior have created controversies in the field. In this review, we present a multistage framework of social decision‐making designed to unify these disparate theories in a process common to all social decisions. We conceptualize this process as involving multiple distinct computational steps, including sensory input, sensory perception, valuation, decision formulation, and behavioral output. Iteratively, these steps generate social behaviors, and oxytocin could be acting on any of these steps to exert its effects. In support of this framework, we examine both behavioral and neural evidence across rodents, non‐human primates, and humans, determining at what point in our multistage framework oxytocin could be eliciting its socially relevant effects. Finally, we postulate based on our framework that the prosocial, social salience, and approach/withdrawal hypotheses may not be mutually exclusive and could explain the influence of oxytocin on social behavior to different extents depending on context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajp.22735

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OXT acting at OXTR in the NBM could modulate the activity of an extensive network of brain areas and influence social behavioral processes like social visual attention, gaze direction, and social decision making.

    “Based on this connectivity of the NBM, we and others have postulated that OXT acting at OXTR in the NBM could modulate the activity of an extensive network of brain areas (which may themselves lack OXTR) and influence social behavioral processes like social visual attention, gaze direction, and social decision making38,39,64,65.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piva, M., & Chang, S. W. C.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Piva, Matthew
Venue
American Journal of Primatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-19
Volume
80
Issue
10
Pages
e22735-e22735
ISSN
  • 0275-2565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2345
OpenAlex
W2790621696
Cited by
38
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Primatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (PGSD3‐471313‐2015)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R00MH099093, R01MH110750, R21MH107853)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (FG‐2015‐66028)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
oxytocin, social decision-making, prosocial behavior, antisocial behavior, social behavior, context sensitivity, rodents, non-human primates, human
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Oxytocin, Primates, Rodentia, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review