Cited by 35Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringPain Management and TreatmentEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Tissue response to a chronically implantable wireless intracortical visual prosthesis (Gennaris array)

Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V, Wong, Yan T, Yan, Edwin, Szlawski, Julian, Mohan, Anand, Clark, Jonathan CM, Rosa, Marcello, Lowery, Arthur·2020·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cortical vision prostheses aim to restore visual percepts to those who have lost sight by delivering electrical stimulation to the visual cortex. These devices need to be implanted intracranially using subdural or intracortical microelectrodes, and should preferably dispense with the need of transcranial wiring. The risks of cortical tissue injury from mechanical trauma, material biocompatibility, heat generation, electrical stimulation and long-term immune responses need to be evaluated. In this paper, we investigate the biological response to a wireless cortical vision prosthesis (Gennaris array), by characterizing the histological changes that occur following chronic electrical stimulation. APPROACH: Ten arrays (7 active, 3 passive) were implanted in three sheep using a pneumatic insertor. Each device consisted of a wireless receiver and Application Specific Integrated Circuit encased in a ceramic box, and could deliver electrical stimulation through one of 43 electrodes. MAIN RESULTS: Stimulation was delivered through seven of these devices for up to 3 months and each device was treated as independent for further analysis. Cumulatively, over 2700 h of stimulation were achieved without any observable adverse health effects. Histology showed that the devices and implantation procedure were well tolerated by the brain with a similar tissue response to the more common Utah arrays. However, voltage transients across the stimulating electrodes were not measured so exact charge injection could not be verified. SIGNIFICANCE: This work represents one of the first long-term tests of a fully implantable cortical vision prosthesis. The results indicate that long-term stimulation through wireless arrays can be achieved without induction of widespread tissue damage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/ab9e1c

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GENNARIS consists of 11 modules with 43 electrodes each.

    “The GENNARIS (Monash Vision Group) consists of 11 modules with 43 electrodes each (figure 6(d)) [106].”
  • The GENNARIS system uses inductive power transfer from a single transmitter coil to transmit data and power to 11 implanted receivers with 43 electrodes each.

    “The GENNARIS system (Monash Vision Group) uses inductive power transfer from a single transmitter coil to transmit data and power to 11 implanted receiver with 43 electrodes each [106].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenfeld, J. V., Wong, Y. T., Yan, E., Szlawski, J., Mohan, A., Clark, J. C., Rosa, M., & Lowery, A.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Australian Research Council (AU)
  • Austin Hospital Pathology
Corresponding author
  • Rosenfeld, Jeffrey V
  • Wong, Yan T
  • Yan, Edwin
  • Szlawski, Julian
  • Mohan, Anand
  • Rosa, Marcello
  • Lowery, Arthur
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2020-07-08
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
046001
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W3036770533
Cited by
35
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • MTPconnect (BioMedTech Horizons)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1075773)
  • Australian Research Council’s Research in Bionic Vision Science and Technology Initiative (SRI 1000006)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
wireless neural stimulation, chronic electrical stimulation, tissue reaction, histology, biocompatibility, sheep model, charge injection, visual cortex stimulation, implantable microelectrodes
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Microelectrodes, Sheep, Visual Cortex, Prosthesis Implantation, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review