Cited by 208Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Probiotics for the Prevention of Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea in Outpatients—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Blaabjerg, Sara, Artzi, Daniel, Aabenhus, Rune·2017·Antibiotics

Abstract

A common adverse effect of antibiotic use is diarrhea. Probiotics are living microorganisms, which, upon oral ingestion, may prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) by the normalization of an unbalanced gastrointestinal flora. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the benefits and harms of probiotics used for the prevention of AAD in an outpatient setting. A search of the PubMed database was conducted and yielded a total of 17 RCTs with 3631 participants to be included in the review. A meta-analysis was conducted for the primary outcome: the incidence of AAD. The pooled results found that AAD was present in 8.0% of the probiotic group compared to 17.7% in the control group (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.66; I2 = 58%), and the species-specific results were similar regarding the probiotic strains L. rhamnosus GG and S. boulardii. However, the overall quality of the included studies was moderate. A meta-analysis of the ten trials reporting adverse events demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the intervention and control group (RD 0.00, 95% CI −0.02 to 0.02, 2.363 participants). The results suggests that probiotic use may be beneficial in the prevention of AAD among outpatients. Furthermore, the use of probiotics appears safe.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/antibiotics6040021

Cites

27 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Probiotics prevent and treat gastrointestinal infections.

    “In addition to modulating the immune system, the positive health effects of taking probiotics include: the improvement of lactose tolerance and digestion [199,205], the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal infections [206], the prevention of colorectal cancer [203,207], reduction in blood cholesterol levels [208,209,210], and the improvement of mental health via the gut-brain axis [211].”

    From Lactic Acid Bacteria in Raw-Milk Cheeses: From Starter Cultures to Probiotic Functions (2022) · cites this paper as [206]

    The Introduction and Results address probiotics for preventing antibiotic-associated diarrhea in outpatients, a narrower gastrointestinal outcome than preventing infections. The H. pylori subgroup in Results §2.4.2 also measures diarrhea during eradication therapy, not whether probiotics treat the infection. The paper therefore does not support the claim's broader prevention-and-treatment wording. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [29]WHO Appendix 1, Definitions of health-care settings and other related terms Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care Is Safer Care World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2009 Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK144006/ (accessed on 1 June 2017)
  2. [33]Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3 The Nordic Cochrane Centre The Cochrane Collaboration Copenhagen, Denmark 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blaabjerg, S., Artzi, D., & Aabenhus, R.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
  • Blaabjerg, Sara
  • Artzi, Daniel
  • Aabenhus, Rune
Venue
Antibiotics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-10-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
21
ISSN
2079-6382 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2762238784
Cited by
208
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 7
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antibiotics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
probiotics, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, diarrhea prevention, outpatients, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Saccharomyces boulardii, adverse events, gut microbiota, antibiotic adverse effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review