Cited by 335Body Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, DietDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 48 of the 92 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Advantages and Limitations of the Body Mass Index (BMI) to Assess Adult Obesity

Open access
Wu, Yilun, Li, Dan, Vermund, Sten H.·2024·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Obesity reflects excessive fat deposits. At-risk individuals are guided by healthcare professionals to eat fewer calories and exercise more, often using body mass index (BMI; weight/height2) thresholds for screening and to guide progress and prognosis. By conducting a mini-narrative review of original articles, websites, editorials, commentaries, and guidelines, we sought to place BMI in the context of its appropriate use in population health, clinical screening, and monitoring in clinical care. The review covers studies and publications through 2023, encompassing consensus reviews and relevant literature. Recent consensus reviews suggest that BMI is a valuable tool for population surveys and primary healthcare screening but has limitations in predicting the risk of chronic diseases and assessing excess fat. BMI can guide nutritional and exercise counseling, even if it is inadequate for reliable individual risk prediction. BMI cut-offs must be reconsidered in populations of varying body build, age, and/or ethnicity. Since BMI-diagnosed overweight persons are sometimes physically and physiologically fit by other indicators, persons who are overweight on BMI should be more fully evaluated, diagnosed, and monitored with combined anthropometric and performance metrics to better clarify risks. The use of combined anthropometric and performance metrics involves integrating measurements of body composition with assessments of physical function and fitness to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of an individual’s health and fitness status. Eligibility for bariatric surgery or semaglutide satiety/appetite-reduction medications should not be determined by BMI alone. Awareness of the advantages and limitations of using BMI as a tool to assess adult obesity can maximize its appropriate use in the context of population health and in rapid clinical screening and evaluation.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This mini-narrative review argues that BMI remains useful for population surveillance and rapid primary-care screening but is inadequate for individual risk prediction, body-fat assessment, and universal cut-offs. It recommends combining BMI with anthropometric, body-composition, and performance/fitness metrics and avoiding BMI alone for treatment eligibility.

Key findings

  • BMI is simple, inexpensive, and useful for population trends and screening, but it does not measure body fat distribution, functional health/fitness, or the heterogeneity of obesity and its outcomes.
  • BMI cut-offs vary by institution and population: NIH 1993 used overweight ≥27.8 kg/m² for men and ≥27.3 kg/m² for women; WHO 1993 used normal 20–24.9, overweight 25–29.9, and obesity ≥30; Chinese adults 2002 used overweight 24–27.9 and obesity ≥28; Indians 2015 used overweight 23–24.9 and obesity ≥25; South Asians 2023 used overweight ≥23.
  • Misclassification and risk-prediction limits are reported: in 40,420 US adults aged >18 years, modeled results suggested >70 million US adults would be misclassified as cardiometabolically healthy or unhealthy by BMI; in 899 women, lean but unfit women had higher all-cause mortality risk than overweight but more fit women; in 15,828 patients with stable coronary heart disease, risk factors rose above BMI 25 kg/m², BMI <20 and ≥35 kg/m² indicated poor prognosis, and lowest all-cause/cardiovascular mortality was at BMI 25–35 kg/m².
  • Body fat varies widely at the same BMI: men with BMI 27 kg/m² had a 95% CI for body fat percentage from 10% to 32%, and the BMI cutoff for type 2 diabetes risk equivalent to 25 kg/m² in White populations was as low as 19.2 kg/m² in South Asians.

Methods

  • Mini-narrative review, not a formal scoping review; the authors searched Google Scholar for popular scientific articles and news critiquing BMI, searched PubMed for principal scientific peer views, and obtained alternative or complementary measures from the CDC, NIH, The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology Commission, AMA, and WHO, and assessed the AMA Council on Science and Public Health critique of BMI.
  • The review covers studies and publications through 2023, encompassing consensus reviews and relevant literature.
  • No systematic search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, quality appraisal, or quantitative synthesis is reported.

Limitations

  • Stated: the authors describe the work as a mini-narrative review rather than a formal scoping review.
  • Evident: no systematic search dates, search strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, risk-of-bias assessment, or meta-analysis are provided, so conclusions rely on selected literature and consensus reports.
  • Evident: the cited numerical findings come from heterogeneous studies with different populations and designs, and the paper does not pool them or formally compare their predictive performance.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph21060757

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

48 of 92 cited sources checked · 16 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 49 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 36
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 28
55 of 55
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Radiation exposure in both DXA and CT is a disadvantage.

    “Radiation exposure in both DXA and CT is a disadvantage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    MRI requires one to be stable in a loud and noisy environment for a long time, which can be costly, tiring, and disruptive for patients, particularly those with claustrophobia.

    “Although MRI does not involve ionizing radiation, it requires one to be stable in a loud and noisy environment for a long time, which can be costly, tiring, and disruptive for patients, particularly those with claustrophobia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Waist-to-hip ratio indicates fat distribution and serves as a reliable predictor of cardiovascular risk.

    “The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), determined using a simple tape measure, indicates fat distribution and serves as a reliable predictor of cardiovascular risk.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • AMA report quotation cites a depression review

    Minor

    The quotation attributed to the 2023 AMA report cites reference 18, but reference 18 is a 2010 review about overweight, obesity, and depression, not an AMA report.

  • Review claims a 2023 literature cutoff but cites 2024 publications

    Minor

    The abstract says the review covers publications through 2023, but the references include publications dated 2024, including reference 57, which is discussed in the text.

  • WHO obesity threshold excludes versus includes BMI 30

    Minor

    The prose defines the WHO obesity threshold as greater than 30 kg/m2, while Table 1 defines it as at least 30 kg/m2. These classify a BMI of exactly 30 differently.

  • Indian BMI thresholds disagree at 23 and 25

    Minor

    The prose excludes BMI 23 from overweight and BMI 25 from obesity, whereas Table 1 includes those respective boundary values.

  • Chinese overweight threshold excludes versus includes BMI 24

    Minor

    The prose says the Chinese overweight threshold is above 24 kg/m2, but Table 1 includes 24 kg/m2 in the overweight range.

5 of 5

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. (2023, June 14). AMA Adopts New Policy Clarifying Role of BMI as a Measure in Medicine. Available online: https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-adopts-new-policy-clarifying-role-bmi-measure-medicine#:~:text=Under%20the%20newly%20adopted%20policy,of%20non%2DHispanic%20white%20populations.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Y., Li, D., & Vermund, S. H.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Vermund, Sten H.
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-06-10
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
757
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399491352
Cited by
332
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 168 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 16
FWCI
77.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
body mass index, adult obesity, obesity screening, anthropometry, body composition, physical fitness, chronic disease risk prediction, semaglutide, obesity diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Obesity, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-20, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-20 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review