Cited by 38SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections StudiesSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Different Neutralization Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 Cell-to-Cell and Cell-Free Modes of Infection to Convalescent Sera

Open access
Kruglova, Natalia, Siniavin, Andrei, Gushchin, Vladimir, Mazurov, Dmitriy·2021·Viruses

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has posed a global threat to human lives and economics. One of the best ways to determine protection against the infection is to quantify the neutralizing activity of serum antibodies. Multiple assays have been developed to validate SARS-CoV-2 neutralization; most of them utilized lentiviral or vesicular stomatitis virus-based particles pseudotyped with the spike (S) protein, making them safe and acceptable to work with in many labs. However, these systems are only capable of measuring infection with purified particles. This study has developed a pseudoviral assay with replication-dependent reporter vectors that can accurately quantify the level of infection directly from the virus producing cell to the permissive target cell. Comparative analysis of cell-free and cell-to-cell infection revealed that the neutralizing activity of convalescent sera was more than tenfold lower in cell cocultures than in the cell-free mode of infection. As the pseudoviral system could not properly model the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, similar experiments were performed with replication-competent coronavirus, which detected nearly complete SARS-CoV-2 cell-to-cell infection resistance to neutralization by convalescent sera. These findings suggest that the cell-to-cell mode of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, for which the mechanisms are largely unknown, could be of great importance for treatment and prevention of COVID-19.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/v13061133

Cites

88 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in neutralization sensitivity were more pronounced when infection tests used replication-competent coronavirus.

    “The observed differences were even more pronounced when infection tests were performed using replication-competent coronavirus [33].”
  • Cell-to-cell infection of SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped HIV-1 was about one order of magnitude less sensitive to neutralization by convalescent sera than cell-free infection.

    “Recently, we pseudotyped HIV-1 particles with SARS-CoV-2 protein S, and, using the HIV-1 replication-dependent reporter vector, inLuc, demonstrated that the cell-to-cell infection of SARS-CoV-2 was about one order of magnitude less sensitive to neutralization by convalescent sera than cell-free infection.”
  • Cell contact-mediated infection is resistant to neutralizing antibodies, demonstrated for HIV-1 and SARS-CoV-2.

    “The importance of the cell-to-cell transmission mechanism for viral dissemination is evidenced by the resistance of cell contact-mediated infection to neutralizing antibodies, which has been demonstrated for HIV-1 [140] and SARS-CoV-2 [33,141].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [60]Zhu Y. Feng F. Hu G. Wang Y. Yu Y. Zhu Y. Xu W. Cai X. Sun Z. Han W. The S1/S2 boundary of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein modulates cell entry pathways and transmission bioRxiv 2020 10.1101/2020 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kruglova, N., Siniavin, A., Gushchin, V., & Mazurov, D.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Gene Biology (RU)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (RU)
Corresponding author
Mazurov, Dmitriy
Venue
Viruses
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-06-12
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
1133
ISSN
1999-4915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3170524766
Cited by
37
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Viruses (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation (075-15-2019-1661)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, neutralizing antibodies, convalescent sera, cell-to-cell transmission, cell-free transmission, spike protein, COVID-19 pandemic
MeSH terms
SARS-CoV-2, Antibodies, Viral, Convalescence, Humans, Neutralization Tests, Genes, Reporter, Antibodies, Neutralizing, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review