The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test
Open accessAbstract
Popular statistical software packages do not have the proper procedures for determining the number of components in factor and principal components analyses. Parallel analysis and Velicer's minimum average partial (MAP) test are validated procedures, recommended widely by statisticians. However, many researchers continue to use alternative, simpler, but flawed procedures, such as the eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule. Use of the proper procedures might be increased if these procedures could be conducted within familiar software environments. This paper describes brief and efficient programs for using SPSS and SAS to conduct parallel analyses and the MAP test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“MAP suggests the smallest number of factors, while PA-SMC95 suggests the largest number of factors (O ' connor, 2000).”
From Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the experiential avoidance in caregiving questionnaire (EACQ) (2023) · cites this paper as O'Connor, 2000
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Empirically, parallel analysis (O’connor, 2000) indicated retention of five, theoretically consistent factors”
From The metacognitive processes of decentering scale: Development and initial validation of trait and state versions (2020) · cites this paper as O’connor, 2000
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis
Horn, J. L. (1965) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289447 · Cited by 8,965
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 · Cited by 3,970
Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain.
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432 · Cited by 3,270
Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations
Velicer, W. F. (1976) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02293557 · Cited by 2,438
Maxwell, A. E., & Harman, H. H. (1968) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2343736 · Cited by 1,853
Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research.
Tinsley, H. E. A., & Tinsley, D. J. (1987) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.414 · Cited by 1,286
Exploratory Factor Analysis: Its Role in Item Analysis
Gorsuch, R. L. (1997) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_5 · Cited by 1,062
Glorfeld, L. W. (1995) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164495055003002 · Cited by 733
Factors Influencing Four Rules For Determining The Number Of Components To Retain
Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1982) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1702_5 · Cited by 519
A Comprehensive Trial Of The Scree And Kg Criteria For Determining The Number Of Factors
Cattell, R. B., & Vogelmann, S. (1977) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1203_2 · Cited by 516
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000006288127 · Cited by 4,087
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications.
Thompson, B. (2004) · doi:10.1037/10694-000 · Cited by 3,469
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282485 · Cited by 2,454
Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice
Watkins, M. W. (2018) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/0095798418771807 · Cited by 2,218
Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A Brief Measure of Dark Personality Traits
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191113514105 · Cited by 2,162
The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future
Lewis, J. R. (2018) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307 · Cited by 1,958
Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five.
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880 · Cited by 1,920
El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada
Lloret-Segura, S., Traver, A. F., Hernández, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014) · Anales de Psicología · doi:10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361 · Cited by 2,164
Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0023353 · Cited by 1,634
Howard, M. C. (2016) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1087664 · Cited by 1,349
Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory.
Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Levy, K. N. (2009) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0016530 · Cited by 1,334
Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317909x481382 · Cited by 1,305
Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020
Mertens, G., Gerritsen, L., Duijndam, S., Salemink, E., & Engelhard, I. M. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102258 · Cited by 1,264
“Following univariate analyses, a simultaneous linear regression was conducted including all significant predictors from the univariate analyses to investigate the unique contribution of each of the predictors in explaining variance in the FCQ. Analyses were conducted in IBM SPSS v26 and an alpha cut-off of .05 was use…”
Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference
Amtmann, D., Cook, K. F., Jensen, M. P., Chen, W.-H., Choi, S., Revicki, D., Cella, D., Rothrock, N., Keefe, F., Callahan, L., et al. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025 · Cited by 1,199
Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.3.385 · Cited by 1,237
Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes
de Winter, J., Dodou, D., & Wieringa, P. A. (2009) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170902794206 · Cited by 1,211
Ten Steps in Scale Development and Reporting: A Guide for Researchers
Carpenter, S. (2018) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583 · Cited by 1,141
Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015474 · Cited by 1,161
Variable-Centered, Person-Centered, and Person-Specific Approaches: Where Theory Meets the Method
Howard, M. C., & Hoffman, M. E. (2018) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428117744021 · Cited by 1,121
Current Methodological Considerations in Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Schmitt, T. A. (2011) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282911406653 · Cited by 995
Spreng*, R. N., McKinnon*, M. C., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890802484381 · Cited by 1,161
Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale
Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279 · Cited by 950
Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis
Osborne, J. W., Costello, A. B., & Kellow, J. T. (2008) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412995627.d8 · Cited by 872
Psychometric Properties of the CES-D-10 in a Psychiatric Sample
Björgvinsson, T., Kertz, S. J., Bigda-Peyton, J. S., McCoy, K. L., & Aderka, I. M. (2013) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191113481998 · Cited by 690
The Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale: Development and initial validation.
Exline, J. J., Pargament, K. I., Grubbs, J. B., & Yali, A. M. (2014) · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · doi:10.1037/a0036465 · Cited by 682
Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes: the Event Related Rumination Inventory
Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., Triplett, K. N., Vishnevsky, T., & Lindstrom, C. M. (2011) · Anxiety, Stress, & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2010.529901 · Cited by 662
Ledesma, R. D., & Valero‐Mora, P. (2020) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/wjnc-nm63 · Cited by 663
Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis
Tate, E. C. (2012) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0152-2 · Cited by 677
Dam, N. T. V., & Earleywine, M. (2010) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.08.018 · Cited by 647
Sharma, L., Markon, K. E., & Clark, L. A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0034418 · Cited by 630
Gaskin, C. J., & Happell, B. (2013) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.005 · Cited by 619
Mohr, J. J., & Kendra, M. S. (2011) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022858 · Cited by 615
Saraswathi, I., Saikarthik, J., Senthil Kumar, K., Madhan Srinivasan, K., Ardhanaari, M., & Gunapriya, R. (2020) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.10164 · Cited by 608
Schaefer, L. M., Burke, N. L., Thompson, J. K., Dedrick, R. F., Heinberg, L. J., Calogero, R. M., Bardone‐Cone, A. M., Higgins, M. K., Frederick, D. A., Kelly, M. C., et al. (2014) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0037917 · Cited by 671
Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2010) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004 · Cited by 655
Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory
Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002 · Cited by 554
Sircova, A., van de Vijver, F., Osin, E., Milfont, T. L., Fieulaine, N., Kislali-Erginbilgic, A., Zimbardo, P., Djarallah, S., Chorfi, M., Leite, U. D. R., et al. (2014) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244013515686 · Cited by 438
Ruscio, J., & Roche, B. (2011) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0025697 · Cited by 533
Attached to meat? (Un)Willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet
Graça, J., Calheiros, M. M., & Oliveira, A. (2015) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.024 · Cited by 534
Validation and psychometric properties of a short version of Young’s Internet Addiction Test
Pawlikowski, M., Altstötter-Gleich, C., & Brand, M. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.014 · Cited by 523
The development and initial validation of the Decent Work Scale.
Duffy, R. D., Allan, B. A., England, J. W., Blustein, D. L., Autin, K. L., Douglass, R. P., Ferreira, J. A., & Santos, E. J. R. (2017) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000191 · Cited by 577
Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Developmental Disability Psychological Research
Norris, M., & Lecavalier, L. (2009) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0816-2 · Cited by 493
Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder
Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2016) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009 · Cited by 509
State Mindfulness Scale (SMS): Development and initial validation.
Tanay, G., & Bernstein, A. (2013) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0034044 · Cited by 561
Ego-dissolution and psychedelics: validation of the ego-dissolution inventory (EDI).
Nour, M. M., Evans, L., Nutt, D., & Carhart-Harris, R. L. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00269 · Cited by 470
Wang, L., Shi, Z., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2010) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02130.x · Cited by 480
Predictors of depression stigma
Griffiths, K. M., Christensen, H., & Jorm, A. F. (2008) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-8-25 · Cited by 454
“The estimated number of components in the scale was initially determined using both parallel analyses (95 th percentile) and the Velicer's Minimum Average Partial Method (MAP, [27]) using a script developed by O'Connor [ 28 ].”
MethodUsing Principal Components and Factor Analysis in Animal Behaviour Research: Caveats and Guidelines
Budaev, S. V. (2010) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01758.x · Cited by 460
Children’s Depression Rating Scale – Revised (CDRS-R)
Keller, F., Grieb, J., Ernst, M., Spröber, N., Fegert, J. M., & Kölch, M. G. (2011) · Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie · doi:10.1024/1422-4917/a000090 · Cited by 453
Capturing the Four-Factor Structure of Psychopathy in College Students Via Self-Report
Williams, K. M., Paulhus, D. L., & Hare, R. D. (2007) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890701268074 · Cited by 487
Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Osborne, G., & Hurling, R. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.010 · Cited by 451
Why we eat what we eat. The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS)
Renner, B., Sproesser, G., Strohbach, S., & Schupp, H. T. (2012) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2012.04.004 · Cited by 507
Approach and Avoidance Motivation in the Social Domain
Elliot, A. J., Gable, S. L., & Mapes, R. R. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205282153 · Cited by 471
Pal, D., & Vanijja, V. (2020) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105535 · Cited by 440
Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model
Sutherland, C. A. M., Oldmeadow, J. A., Santos, I. M., Towler, J. R., Burt, D. M., & Young, A. W. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.001 · Cited by 431
Rosenbaum, M. S., & Massiah, C. A. (2007) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670506295851 · Cited by 416
Exploring the Social Supportive Role of Third Places in Consumers' Lives
Rosenbaum, M. S. (2006) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670506289530 · Cited by 390
The development and initial validation of the cyberchondria severity scale (CSS)
McElroy, E., & Shevlin, M. (2014) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.12.007 · Cited by 383
de Winter, J., & Dodou, D. (2011) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2011.610445 · Cited by 385
Eppmann, R., Bekk, M., & Klein, K. (2018) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2018.03.002 · Cited by 420
A Reconsideration of the Self-Compassion Scale’s Total Score: Self-Compassion versus Self-Criticism
López, A., Sanderman, R., Smink, A., Zhang, Y., van Sonderen, E., Ranchor, A., & Schroevers, M. J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132940 · Cited by 380
Construction and initial validation of the Gendered Racial Microaggressions Scale for Black women.
Lewis, J. A., & Neville, H. A. (2015) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000062 · Cited by 468
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00330.x · Cited by 557
Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation
Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C., Fernandino, L., Simons, S. B., Aguilar, M., & Desai, R. H. (2016) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426 · Cited by 376
Drouin, M., McDaniel, B. T., Pater, J., & Toscos, T. (2020) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0284 · Cited by 367
The empirical structure of narrative identity: The initial Big Three
McLean, K. C., Syed, M., Pasupathi, M., Adler, J. M., Dunlop, W. L., Drustrup, D., Fivush, R., Graci, M. E., Lilgendahl, J. P., Lodi-Smith, J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000247 · Cited by 358
Are worry, rumination, and post-event processing one and the same?
McEvoy, P. M., Mahoney, A. E. J., & Moulds, M. L. (2010) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.008 · Cited by 360
Gershon, R. C., Lai, J. S., Bode, R. K., Choi, S. W., Moy, C. S., Bleck, T., Miller, D. M., Peterman, A. H., & Cella, D. F. (2011) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9958-8 · Cited by 361
Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., Parker, J. D. A., & Dickens, S. E. (2005) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000089224 · Cited by 359
Karim, J., Weisz, R., Bibi, Z., & Rehman, S. U. (2014) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-014-9281-y · Cited by 373
Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.20195 · Cited by 398
Dadds, M. R., Fraser, J., Frost, A. D. J., & Hawes, D. J. (2005) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.73.3.400 · Cited by 367
The Development and Validation of the Game User Experience Satisfaction Scale (GUESS)
Phan, M. H., Keebler, J. R., & Chaparro, B. S. (2016) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720816669646 · Cited by 368
Remanufactured Products in Closed‐Loop Supply Chains for Consumer Goods
Abbey, J. D., Meloy, M. G., Guide, V. D. R., & Atalay, S. (2014) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12238 · Cited by 360
Development and psychometric evaluation of a three‐dimensional Gambling Motives Questionnaire
Stewart, S. H., & Zack, M. H. (2008) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02235.x · Cited by 344
Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the SCL-90-R: A study on a large community sample
Prunas, A., Sarno, I., Preti, E., Madeddu, F., & Perugini, M. (2011) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.12.006 · Cited by 344
Non-Graphical Solutions for Cattell’s Scree Test
Raîche, G., Walls, T. A., Magis, D., Riopel, M., & Blais, J. (2012) · Methodology · doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000051 · Cited by 341
Linking Empowering Leadership to Job Satisfaction, Work Effort, and Creativity
Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2015) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051814565819 · Cited by 435
A new look at Horn’s parallel analysis with ordinal variables.
Garrido, L. E., Abad, F. J., & Ponsoda, V. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0030005 · Cited by 346
Edmunds, R., Thorpe, M., & Conole, G. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01142.x · Cited by 336
Openness to Experience, Intellect, and Cognitive Ability
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., Peterson, J. B., & Gray, J. R. (2013) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.806327 · Cited by 370
Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)
Jermann, F., Van der Linden, M., d'Acremont, M., & Zermatten, A. (2006) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.126 · Cited by 324
Patil, V. H., Singh, S. N., Mishra, S. K., & Donavan, D. T. (2007) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.008 · Cited by 326
Etter, J., Houezec, J. L., & Perneger, T. (2003) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300030 · Cited by 325
Children's Somatization Inventory: Psychometric Properties of the Revised Form (CSI-24)
Walker, L. S., Beck, J. E., Garber, J., & Lambert, W. (2009) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsn093 · Cited by 320
A Measure of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Children Using Parent Ratings
Dadds, M. R., Hunter, K., Hawes, D. J., Frost, A. D. J., Vassallo, S., Bunn, P., Merz, S., & Masry, Y. E. (2007) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-007-0075-4 · Cited by 315
Fried, E. I., van Borkulo, C. D., Epskamp, S., Schoevers, R. A., Tuerlinckx, F., & Borsboom, D. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000275 · Cited by 314
Development of a Theory-Based Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness
Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M., & Moore, D. D. (2007) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164406292085 · Cited by 320
Development and Validation of a Short Form of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire
Elgar, F. J., Waschbusch, D. A., Dadds, M. R., & Sigvaldason, N. (2006) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-006-9082-5 · Cited by 313
Cook, K., Kallen, M., & Amtmann, D. (2009) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9464-4 · Cited by 300
Why we post selfies: Understanding motivations for posting pictures of oneself
Sung, Y., Lee, J.-A., Kim, E., & Choi, S. M. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.032 · Cited by 312
Betan, E., Heim, A. K., Zittel Conklin, C., & Westen, D. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.5.890 · Cited by 419
Cappelleri, J. C., Bushmakin, A., Gerber, R. A., Leidy, N., Sexton, C., Karlsson, J., & Lowe, M. R. (2009) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2009.107 · Cited by 313
Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Moral Injury Questionnaire—Military Version
Currier, J. M., Holland, J. M., Drescher, K. D., & Foy, D. W. (2013) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.1866 · Cited by 288
Measuring Perceived Usability: The CSUQ, SUS, and UMUX
Lewis, J. R. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1418805 · Cited by 327
Hervás, G., & Vázquez, C. (2013) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-66 · Cited by 274
“Structural validity was assessed using principal components factor analysis, and the number of factors was determined through the Velicer's minimum average partial test [51,52].”
MethodYang, C., & Brown, B. B. (2012) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9836-x · Cited by 298
Agentic and Communal Values: Their Scope and Measurement
Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.627968 · Cited by 276
A Cup of Coffee With a Dash of Love
Rosenbaum, M. S., Ward, J. C., Walker, B. A., & Ostrom, A. L. (2007) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670507303011 · Cited by 288
Morey, L. C., Berghuis, H., Bender, D. S., Verheul, R., Krueger, R. F., & Skodol, A. E. (2011) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.577853 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- O’connor, B. P.
- Affiliations
- Lakehead University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- O’connor, Brian P.
- ORCID
- O’connor, Brian P.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 396-402
- ISSN
- 0743-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5970
- OpenAlex
- W2124563089
- Cited by
- 4,116
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 140 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 212 · 2023: 190 · 2022: 234 · 2021: 268 · 2020: 285 · 2019: 245 · 2018: 249 · 2017: 286 · 2016: 227 · 2015: 252 · 2014: 221 · 2013: 207 · 2012: 169
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- number of components, parallel analysis, factor analysis, principal component analysis, SAS program
- MeSH terms
- Factor Analysis, Statistical, Psychology, Software
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review