Cited by 557Personality Traits and PsychologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality

DeYoung, Colin G., Peterson, Jordan B., Higgins, Daniel M.·2005·Journal of Personality

Abstract

We characterize Openness/Intellect as motivated cognitive flexibility, or cognitive exploration, and develop a neuropsychological model relating it to dopaminergic function and to the functions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Evidence is reviewed for sources of Openness/Intellect shared with Extraversion and sources unique to Openness/Intellect. The hypothesis that the cognitive functions of the dorsolateral PFC are among the latter was tested using standard measures of cognitive ability and a battery of tasks associated with dorsolateral PFC function (N=175). Dorsolateral PFC function, as well as both fluid and crystallized cognitive ability, was positively related to Openness/Intellect but no other personality trait. Additionally, facet level analysis supported the characterization of Openness/Intellect as a primarily cognitive trait.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00330.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social neuroscience studies support that acceptance and openness to experience and related emotion regulation processes are bound to executive functioning.

    “Other social neuroscience studies provide additional support for the notion that acceptance of and openness to experience, and related emotion regulation processes are bound to executive functioning (DeYoung, Peterson, & Higgins, 2005; Kalisch et al., 2005; Ochsner & Gross, 2008).”

    From Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health (2010) · cites this paper as DeYoung, Peterson, & Higgins, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • DeYoung, Colin G.
  • Peterson, Jordan B.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05-04
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
825-858
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2100773499
Cited by
557
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
openness to experience, Big Five personality traits, cognitive flexibility, dopaminergic activity, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, extraversion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Association Learning, Cognition, Dopamine, Extraversion, Psychological, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality, Personality Assessment, Psychological Tests, Self Disclosure, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review