Cited by 114Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

The local high-velocity tail and the Galactic escape speed

Open access
Deason, Alis J, Fattahi, Azadeh, Belokurov, Vasily, Evans, N Wyn, Grand, Robert J J, Marinacci, Federico, Pakmor, Rüdiger·2019·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We model the fastest moving (⁠|$v_{\rm tot} \gt 300 \, {\rm km}\, \, {\rm s}^{-1}$|⁠) local (D ≲ 3 kpc) halo stars using cosmological simulations and six-dimensional Gaia data. Our approach is to use our knowledge of the assembly history and phase-space distribution of halo stars to constrain the form of the high-velocity tail of the stellar halo. Using simple analytical models and cosmological simulations, we find that the shape of the high-velocity tail is strongly dependent on the velocity anisotropy and number density profile of the halo stars – highly eccentric orbits and/or shallow density profiles have more extended high-velocity tails. The halo stars in the solar vicinity are known to have a strongly radial velocity anisotropy, and it has recently been shown the origin of these highly eccentric orbits is the early accretion of a massive (⁠|$M_{\rm star}\sim 10^9 \, \mathrm{M}_\odot$|⁠) dwarf satellite. We use this knowledge to construct a prior on the shape of the high-velocity tail. Moreover, we use the simulations to define an appropriate outer boundary of 2r200, beyond which stars can escape. After applying our methodology to the Gaia data, we find a local (r0 = 8.3 kpc) escape speed of |$v_{\rm esc}(r_0) = 528^{+24}_{-25} \, {\rm km}\, \, {\rm s}^{-1}$|⁠. We use our measurement of the escape velocity to estimate the total Milky Way mass, and dark halo concentration: |$M_{200, \rm tot} = 1.00^{+0.31}_{-0.24} \times 10^{12}\, \mathrm{M}_\odot$|⁠, |$c_{200}=10.9^{+4.4}_{-3.3}$|⁠. Our estimated mass agrees with recent results in the literature that seem to be converging on a Milky Way mass of |$M_{200, \rm tot} \sim 10^{12}\, \mathrm{M}_\odot$|⁠.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stz623

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Binney J., Tremaine S., 1987, Galactic dynamics. Princeton University Press
  2. Di Matteo P., Haywood M., Lehnert M. D., Katz D., Khoperskov S., Snaith O. N., Gómez A., Robichon N., 2018, arXiv e-prints,
  3. Eadie G., Juri´ c M., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1810.10036 ) · arXiv
  4. Eilers A.-C., Hogg D. W., Rix H.-W., Ness M., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1810.09466 ) · arXiv
  5. Macciò A. V., Dutton A. A., van den Bosch F. C., 2008, MNRAS, 391, 1940 Malhan K., Ibata R. A., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1807.05994 ) · arXiv
  6. Monachesi A., et al., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1804.07798 ) · arXiv
  7. Tremaine S. D., 1987, in de Zeeuw P. T., ed., IAU Symposium Vol. 127, Structure and Dynamics of Elliptical Galaxies. p. 367
  8. Watkins L. L., van der Marel R. P., Sohn S. T., Evans N. W., 2018, preprint, ( arXiv:1804.11348 ) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deason, A. J., Fattahi, A., Belokurov, V., Evans, N. W., Grand, R. J. J., Marinacci, F., & Pakmor, R.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Deason, Alis J
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2019-03-02
Volume
485
Issue
3
Pages
3514-3526
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2908745213
Cited by
114
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15
FWCI
9.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/P000541/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/K003267/1)
  • European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (308024, 609412)
  • European Space Agency
  • Durham University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
stellar halo, Milky Way mass, velocity anisotropy, eccentric orbits, halo density profiles, Gaia data, cosmological simulations, halo stars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review