The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CXC Chemokine Ligand 4 Induces a Unique Transcriptome in Monocyte-Derived Macrophages
Open accessAbstract
In atherosclerotic arteries, blood monocytes differentiate to macrophages in the presence of growth factors, such as macrophage colony-stimulation factor (M-CSF), and chemokines, such as platelet factor 4 (CXCL4). To compare the gene expression signature of CXCL4-induced macrophages with M-CSF–induced macrophages or macrophages polarized with IFN-γ/LPS (M1) or IL-4 (M2), we cultured primary human peripheral blood monocytes for 6 d. mRNA expression was measured by Affymetrix gene chips, and differences were analyzed by local pooled error test, profile of complex functionality, and gene set enrichment analysis. Three hundred seventy-five genes were differentially expressed between M-CSF– and CXCL4-induced macrophages; 206 of them overexpressed in CXCL4 macrophages coding for genes implicated in the inflammatory/immune response, Ag processing and presentation, and lipid metabolism. CXCL4-induced macrophages overexpressed some M1 and M2 genes and the corresponding cytokines at the protein level; however, their transcriptome clustered with neither M1 nor M2 transcriptomes. They almost completely lost the ability to phagocytose zymosan beads. Genes linked to atherosclerosis were not consistently upregulated or downregulated. Scavenger receptors showed lower and cholesterol efflux transporters showed higher expression in CXCL4- than M-CSF–induced macrophages, resulting in lower low-density lipoprotein content. We conclude that CXCL4 induces a unique macrophage transcriptome distinct from known macrophage types, defining a new macrophage differentiation that we propose to call M4.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625
The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization
MANTOVANI, A., SICA, A., SOZZANI, S., ALLAVENA, P., VECCHI, A., & LOCATI, M. (2004) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015 · Cited by 6,534
Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity
Gordon, S., & Taylor, P. R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1733 · Cited by 5,190
Yoshida, H., Hayashi, S.-I., Kunisada, T., Ogawa, M., Nishikawa, S., Okamura, H., Sudo, T., Shultz, L. D., & Nishikawa, S.-I. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/345442a0 · Cited by 1,789
Alternative activation of macrophages: immune function and cellular biology
Varin, A., & Gordon, S. (2009) · Immunobiology · doi:10.1016/j.imbio.2008.11.009 · Cited by 361
Macrophage heterogeneity and tissue lipids
Gordon, S. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci30992 · Cited by 207
Cited by
Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm
Biswas, S. K., & Mantovani, A. (2010) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.1937 · Cited by 3,840
Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling
Mantovani, A., Biswas, S. K., Galdiero, M. R., Sica, A., & Locati, M. (2013) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.4133 · Cited by 2,384
Orecchioni, M., Ghosheh, Y., Pramod, A. B., & Ley, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01084 · Cited by 2,063
Self-citationMicroglial M1/M2 polarization and metabolic states
Orihuela, R., McPherson, C. A., & Harry, G. J. (2016) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.13139 · Cited by 2,070
Implications of macrophage polarization in autoimmunity
Funes, S. C., Rios, M., Escobar‐Vera, J., & Kalergis, A. M. (2018) · Immunology · doi:10.1111/imm.12910 · Cited by 1,005
Macrophage phenotypes in atherosclerosis
Colin, S., Chinetti‐Gbaguidi, G., & Staels, B. (2014) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12218 · Cited by 657
Kroner, A., Greenhalgh, A. D., Zarruk, J. G., Passos dos Santos, R., Gaestel, M., & David, S. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.027 · Cited by 655
Heme oxygenase–1, oxidation, inflammation, and atherosclerosis
Araujo, J. A., Zhang, M., & Yin, F. (2012) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2012.00119 · Cited by 443
Ma, Y., Mouton, A. J., & Lindsey, M. L. (2018) · Translational Research · doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2017.10.001 · Cited by 405
Macrophage polarization in metabolic disorders: functions and regulation
Chinetti-Gbaguidi, G., & Staels, B. (2011) · Current Opinion in Lipidology · doi:10.1097/mol.0b013e32834a77b4 · Cited by 175
Wolfs, I., Donners, M., & de Winther, M. (2011) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1160/th11-05-0320 · Cited by 157
Macrophage metabolism in atherosclerosis
Bories, G. F. P., & Leitinger, N. (2017) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.12786 · Cited by 145
Hacking the host: exploitation of macrophage polarization by intracellular bacterial pathogens
Thiriot, J. D., Martinez-Martinez, Y. B., Endsley, J. J., & Torres, A. G. (2020) · Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1093/femspd/ftaa009 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Gleissner, C. A., Shaked, I., Little, K. M., & Ley, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-05-01
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4810-4818
- ISSN
- 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6606
- OpenAlex
- W2169616733
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
