Cited by 113Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Internet and mobile interventions for depression: Opportunities and challenges: Cuijpers et al .

Open access
Cuijpers, Pim, Kleiboer, Annet, Karyotaki, Eirini, Riper, Heleen·2017·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Internet offers several new ways of developing, implementing, and disseminating evidence-based interventions for depression. METHODS: In this paper, we narratively synthesized the evidence showing that Internet-based therapies are effective in treating depression. RESULTS: In the past decade, a considerable number of psychological treatments have been developed for the treatment of depression and several hundreds of randomized controlled trials have been conducted, showing that these interventions are effective and that there are no major differences in effects between therapies. Several meta-analyses show that Internet-based treatments are also effective in depression. Direct comparisons with face-to-face treatments do not indicate that there are relevant differences between Internet-based and face-to-face treatment formats. The challenge for the near future is to examine how these treatments can be integrated in mental health care. Major opportunities are in preventive services, primary care, specialized mental health care, and in patients with comorbid general medical disorders. New technological innovations through the smartphone, serious gaming, avatars, augmented reality, and virtual reality will give further possibilities to simplify and perhaps increase the effects of treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The Internet offers many possibilities to increase access to evidence-based psychological treatments of depression. New technological may further improve access and, perhaps, the effects of treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22641

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuijpers, P., Kleiboer, A., Karyotaki, E., & Riper, H.
Affiliations
Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Corresponding author
Cuijpers, Pim
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-04
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
596-602
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2610392082
Cited by
112
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, online intervention, mobile-based interventions, psychological intervention, digital mental health, smartphone technology, serious games, virtual reality, augmented reality, access to mental health care, primary care, prevention
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Humans, Psychotherapy, Internet, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review