The DOI matches its DataCite record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding
Open accessAbstract
While supervised learning has enabled great progress in many applications, unsupervised learning has not seen such widespread adoption, and remains an important and challenging endeavor for artificial intelligence. In this work, we propose a universal unsupervised learning approach to extract useful representations from high-dimensional data, which we call Contrastive Predictive Coding. The key insight of our model is to learn such representations by predicting the future in latent space by using powerful autoregressive models. We use a probabilistic contrastive loss which induces the latent space to capture information that is maximally useful to predict future samples. It also makes the model tractable by using negative sampling. While most prior work has focused on evaluating representations for a particular modality, we demonstrate that our approach is able to learn useful representations achieving strong performance on four distinct domains: speech, images, text and reinforcement learning in 3D environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For example, Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) [80,143] utilizes a contrastive future prediction task, and it was found that predicting one or two timesteps in the future is (too) easy and results in poor performance, whereas predicting multiple timesteps into the future is much more complex, and leads to very effective representations.”
From Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Task (2025) · cites this paper as [143]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Using this contrastive loss, self-supervised networks learn to make the representations similar for positive pairs, and dissimilar for negative pairs, and hence are able to cluster similar (or positive) samples together and push apart dissimilar (or negative) samples.”
From Detecting galaxy tidal features using self-supervised representation learning (2024) · cites this paper as Oord et al. 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It means that InfoNCE loss maximizes the agreement of two different augmented sequences' representations from the same sequence while minimizing the agreement with other negative sequences.”
From Contrastive Learning from Extremely Augmented Skeleton Sequences for Self-Supervised Action Recognition (2022) · cites this paper as Oord, Li, and Vinyals 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“We introduce the Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) framework to human activity recognition, which captures the long-term temporal structure of sensor data streams.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As mentioned in [58], either 𝑐 𝑡 (the output of 𝑔 𝑒𝑛𝑐 ) or 𝑧 𝑡 (the output of 𝑔 𝑎𝑟 ) can be utilized as the representation.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The framework for data augmentation and batch formation plays a critical role in multi-view similarity learning [12,16,44,115], where we start by following the popular SimCLR [16] method.”
From MARs: Multi-view Attention Regularizations for Patch-based Feature Recognition of Space Terrain (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We note that this is a common setting for self-supervised contrastive learners with NCE objectives (Gutmann & Hyvärinen, 2010;Oord et al., 2018), including SimCLR (Chen et al., 2020) and SimCSE (Gao et al., 2021).”
From The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (2024) · cites this paper as Oord et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The key insight behind this approach is that predicting just the next future timestep involves exploiting the local smoothness of the signal, whereas predicting multiple subsequent timesteps requires inferring the global structure of time-series data.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Haresamudram et al. [80] adapted Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC [143]) for HAR, emphasizing the importance of temporal structure in sensor data representation.”
From Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Task (2025) · cites this paper as [143]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Contrastive predictive coding (CPC) proposed by [109] provides a contrastive learning framework to perform the prediction task using InfoNCE loss.”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It can be seen that CPC does not directly predict future observations x t + k . Instead, it tries to preserve the mutual information of c t and x t + k .”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This contrastive loss, or InfoNCE loss (Oord et al. 2018), is minimised when the similarity is high for positive pairs and low for negative pairs.”
From Detecting galaxy tidal features using self-supervised representation learning (2024) · cites this paper as Oord et al. 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To evaluate the performance of our TS-TCC model, we follow the standard linear benchmarking evaluation scheme [Oord et al. , 2018; Chen et al. , 2020]. Particularly, we train a linear classifier (single MLP layer) on top of a frozen self-supervised pretrained encoder model.”
From Time-Series Representation Learning via Temporal and Contextual Contrasting (2021) · cites this paper as Oord et al. , 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Contrastive-based methods usually use a contrastive similarity metric, such as InfoNCE loss [109].”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This results in representations that encode the high-level information between temporally separated parts of the time-series signal [58], thereby leading to improved downstream recognition performance.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) [58], which is the focus of this work, performs contrastive learning over multiple future timestep predictions.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This framework has resulted in excellent representation learning performance across domains such as computer vision [12, 33, 35], natural language [49], speech recognition [6, 58] and time-series data [39].”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“If extra context from the past is useful for classification, then 𝑐 𝑡 can be used; else 𝑧 𝑡 may be more effective.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“SimCLR aims to maximize the learned representation similarity between augmented views of the same input.”
From MARs: Multi-view Attention Regularizations for Patch-based Feature Recognition of Space Terrain (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 1×
“More recent advancements in autoregressive modeling such as masked convolutional architectures [18, 19] or self-attention networks [20] could help improve results further.”
BackgroundImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · cited 1×
“These techniques made manually specified features largely redundant and have greatly improved state-of-the-art in several real-world applications [1, 2, 3].”
MethodAdam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1×
“We use the Adam optimizer [32] with a learning rate of 2e-4, and use 8 GPUs each with a minibatch of 8 examples from which the negative samples in the contrastive loss are drawn.”
MethodImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380 · cited 1×
“In our visual representation experiments we use the ILSVRC ImageNet competition dataset [34].”
MethodBatch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818 · cited 1×
“We did not use Batch-Norm [38].”
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568 · cited 2×
“In Word2Vec [9] neighbouring words are predicted using a contrastive loss.”
BackgroundLearning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766 · cited 1×
“These techniques made manually specified features largely redundant and have greatly improved state-of-the-art in several real-world applications [1, 2, 3].”
BackgroundSelf-citationFaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering
Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., & Philbin, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298682 · Cited by 15,267 · cited 1×
“For example, the techniques proposed by [21, 22, 23] were based on triplet losses using a max-margin approach to separate positive from negative examples.”
MethodLayer NormalizationPreprint
Ba, J., Kiros, J., & Hinton, G. E. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06450 · Cited by 13,762 · cited 1×
“[41] is the same skip-thought model with layer normalization trained for 1M iterations. evaluate with 10-fold cross-validation for MR, CR, Subj, MPQA and use the train/test split for TREC.”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [12][12] Michael Gutmann and Aapo Hyvärinen. Noise-contrastive estimation: A new estimation principle for unnormalized statistical models. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 297-304, 2010. -
- [31][31] Daniel Povey, Arnab Ghoshal, Gilles Boulianne, Lukas Burget, Ondrej Glembek, Nagendra Goel, Mirko Hannemann, Petr Motlicek, Yanmin Qian, Petr Schwarz, et al. The kaldi speech recognition toolkit. In IEEE 2011 workshop on automatic speech recognition and understanding . IEEE Signal Processing Society, 2011. -
- [33][33] Laurens van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of machine learning research , 9(Nov):2579-2605, 2008. -
- [48][48] Sida Wang and Christopher D. Manning. Baselines and bigrams: Simple, good sentiment and topic classification. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers - Volume 2 , ACL '12, pages 90-94, 2012. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,066 of 1,066
Self-Supervision Closes the Gap Between Weak and Strong Supervision in HistologyPreprint
Dehaene, O., Camara, A., Moindrot, O., de Lavergne, A., & Courtiol, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.03583 · Cited by 83
SSTN: Self-Supervised Domain Adaptation Thermal Object Detection for Autonomous Driving
Munir, F., Azam, S., & Jeon, M. (2021) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636353 · Cited by 51
CCGL: Contrastive Cascade Graph Learning
Xu, X., Zhou, F., Zhang, K., & Liu, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2022.3151829 · Cited by 51
Contrastive Quantization with Code Memory for Unsupervised Image Retrieval
Wang, J., Zeng, Z., Chen, B., Dai, T., & Xia, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i3.20147 · Cited by 52
An Exploration of Self-Supervised Pretrained Representations for End-to-End Speech Recognition
Chang, X., Maekaku, T., Guo, P., Shi, J. Y., Lu, Y.-J., Subramanian, A. S., Wang, T., Yang, S.-W., Tsao, Y., Lee, H.-Y., et al. (2021) · IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU) · doi:10.1109/asru51503.2021.9688137 · Cited by 64
Classification of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Class Knowledge Banks
Xu, Y., Han, K., Zhou, Y., Wu, J. F., Xie, X. Y., & Xiang, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.811028 · Cited by 46
GHNN: Graph Harmonic Neural Networks for semi-supervised graph-level classification
Ju, W., Luo, X., Ma, Z., et al. (2022) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2022.03.018 · Cited by 47
Exploring the Equivalence of Siamese Self-Supervised Learning via A Unified Gradient Framework
Tao, C., Wang, H., Zhu, X., Dong, J., Song, S., Huang, G. M., & Dai, J. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01403 · Cited by 51
Pandiyan, V., Cui, D., Le‐Quang, T., et al. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Processes · doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.07.033 · Cited by 47
Temporal augmented contrastive learning for micro-expression recognition
Wang, T., & Shang, L. (2023) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2023.02.003 · Cited by 46
EMSCNet: Efficient Multisample Contrastive Network for Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification
Zhao, Y., Liu, J., Yang, J., & Wu, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2023.3262840 · Cited by 49
Self-Supervised Vision Transformers Learn Visual Concepts in Histopathology
Chen, R. J., & Krishnan, R. G. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.00585 · Cited by 52
Lin, Z., Zhang, D., Shi, D., Xu, R., Tao, Q., Wu, L., He, M., & Ge, Z. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104281 · Cited by 39
Sense and Learn: Self-supervision for omnipresent sensors
Saeed, A., Ungureanu, V., & Gfeller, B. (2021) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100152 · Cited by 34
COOKIE: Contrastive Cross-Modal Knowledge Sharing Pre-training for Vision-Language Representation
Wen, K., Xia, J., Huang, Y., Li, L., Xu, J., & Shao, J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00221 · Cited by 37
Spurious normativity enhances learning of compliance and enforcement behavior in artificial agents
Köster, R., Hadfield-Menell, D., Everett, R., Weidinger, L., Hadfield, G. K., & Leibo, J. Z. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2106028118 · Cited by 37
auto SMIM: Automatic Superpixel-Based Masked Image Modeling for Skin Lesion Segmentation
Wang, Z., Lyu, J., & Tang, X. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2023.3290700 · Cited by 35
Voice Deepfake Detection Using the Self-Supervised Pre-Training Model HuBERT
Li, L., Lu, T., Ma, X., Yuan, M., & Wan, D. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13148488 · Cited by 33
Social Diversity and Social Preferences in Mixed-Motive Reinforcement Learning
McKee, K. R., Gemp, I., McWilliams, B., Duèñez-Guzmán, E. A., Hughes, E., & Leibo, J. Z. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems · doi:10.65109/dnuf7773 · Cited by 33
UPRISE: Universal Prompt Retrieval for Improving Zero-Shot Evaluation
Cheng, D., Huang, S., Bi, J., Zhan, Y., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Sun, H., Wei, F., Deng, W., & Zhang, Q. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.758 · Cited by 32
Haresamudram, H., Tang, C. I., Suh, S., Lukowicz, P., & Plötz, T. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3729467 · Cited by 33
Pre-training in Medical Data: A Survey
Qiu, Y., Lin, F., Chen, W., & Xu, M. (2023) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-022-1382-8 · Cited by 30
RankGen: Improving Text Generation with Large Ranking Models
Krishna, K., Chang, Y., Wieting, J., & Iyyer, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.15 · Cited by 30
Mondol, R. K., Millar, E. K. A., Sowmya, A., & Meijering, E. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3418341 · Cited by 29
The Platonic Representation Hypothesis
Huh, M., Cheung, B., Wang, T., & Isola, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.07987 · Cited by 35
“We note that this is a common setting for self-supervised contrastive learners with NCE objectives (Gutmann & Hyv¨arinen, 2010; Oord et al., 2018), including SimCLR (Chen et al., 2020) and SimCSE (Gao et al., 2021).”
Kadi, H. A., & Terzić, K. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23052389 · Cited by 27
Contrasting Contrastive Self-Supervised Representation Learning Pipelines
Kotar, K., Ilharco, G., Schmidt, L., Ehsani, K., & Mottaghi, R. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00980 · Cited by 28
Investigating Enhancements to Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition
Haresamudram, H., Essa, I., & Plötz, T. (2023) · 2023 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom) · doi:10.1109/percom56429.2023.10099197 · Cited by 27
Word Segmentation on Discovered Phone Units With Dynamic Programming and Self-Supervised Scoring
Kamper, H. (2023) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3229264 · Cited by 24
Enriched music representations with multiple cross-modal contrastive learning
Ferraro, A., Favory, X., Drossos, K., Kim, Y., & Bogdanov, D. (2021) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2021.3071082 · Cited by 23
Spatial-Temporal Masked Autoencoder for Multi-Device Wearable Human Activity Recognition
Miao, S., Chen, L., & Hu, R. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3631415 · Cited by 23
Turgut, Ö., Müller, P., Hager, P., Shit, S., Starck, S., Menten, M. J., Martens, E., & Rueckert, D. (2025) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103451 · Cited by 22
Proof Artifact Co-training for Theorem Proving with Language Models
Han, J. M., Rute, J., Wu, Y., Ayers, E. W., & Polu, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.06203 · Cited by 21
SSLP: Spatial Guided Self-supervised Learning on Pathological Images
Li, J., Lin, T., & Xu, Y. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87196-3_1 · Cited by 26
Pearce-Casey, R., Nagam, B. C., Wilde, J., Busillo, V., Ulivi, L., Andika, I. T., Manjón-García, A., Leuzzi, L., Matavulj, P., Serjeant, S., et al. (2025) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453152 · Cited by 18
C-Learning: Learning to Achieve Goals via Recursive Classification
Eysenbach, B., Salakhutdinov, R., & Levine, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.08909 · Cited by 18
Abstraction for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Shanahan, M., & Mitchell, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/780 · Cited by 17
Improving Representation Learning for Histopathologic Images with Cluster Constraints
Wu, W., Gao, C., DiPalma, J., Vosoughi, S., & Hassanpour, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01957 · Cited by 16
“One of the key paradigms of SSL is contrastive-based SSL [19, 11, 35, 38, 25].”
BackgroundMethodWhat Do Self-Supervised Vision Transformers Learn?
Park, N., Kim, W., Heo, B., Kim, T., & Yun, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.00729 · Cited by 29
“Neural network models are implemented in PyTorch (Paszke et al., 2019 (Oord et al., 2018) have been proposed.”
MethodText-Free Prosody-Aware Generative Spoken Language Modeling
Kharitonov, E., Lee, A., Polyak, A., Adi, Y., Copet, J., Lakhotia, K., Nguyen, T.-A., Rivière, M., Mohamed, A., Dupoux, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.03264 · Cited by 16
Detecting galaxy tidal features using self-supervised representation learning
Desmons, A., Brough, S., & Lanusse, F. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1402 · Cited by 15
Self-supervised Regularization for Text Classification
Zhou, M., Li, Z., & Xie, P. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00389 · Cited by 14
Jumping through Local Minima: Quantization in the Loss Landscape of Vision Transformers
Frumkin, N., Gope, D., & Marculescu, D. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01557 · Cited by 14
Generalization to New Actions in Reinforcement Learning
Jain, A., Szot, A., & Lim, J. J. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.01928 · Cited by 14
“While we use reconstruction objectives in HVAE, hierarchical action representations can also be obtained using contrastive learning approaches (Oord et al., 2018).”
MethodChen, X., Zhou, X., Sun, M., & Wang, H. (2025) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2024.3491933 · Cited by 13
“We select InfoNCE loss [31] as our objective function in the pretraining stage, which has shown success in other self-supervised learning frameworks [5], [6].”
Brucklacher, M., Bohté, S. M., Mejias, J. F., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2023.1207361 · Cited by 15
“The Hebbian learning rule thus groups together consecutive inputs in a manner reminiscent of contrastive, self-supervised methods (34,35,58) 275”
MethodPredictive coding with spiking neurons and feedforward gist signaling
Lee, K., Dora, S., Mejias, J. F., Bohte, S. M., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2024.1338280 · Cited by 14
Speech2Video: Cross-Modal Distillation for Speech to Video Generation
Si, S., Wang, J., Qu, X., Cheng, N., Wei, W., Zhu, X., & Xiao, J. (2021) · Interspeech 2021 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2021-1996 · Cited by 12
Visual information processing through the interplay between fine and coarse signal pathways
Zou, X., Ji, Z., Zhang, T., Huang, T., & Wu, S. (2023) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2023.07.048 · Cited by 9
ReACC: A Retrieval-Augmented Code Completion Framework
Lu, S., Duan, N., Han, H., Guo, D., Hwang, S.-W., & Svyatkovskiy, A. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.07722 · Cited by 96
“, 2020), we adopt in-batch negatives to calculate the contrastive loss by InfoNCE (Oord et al., 2018):”
MethodHow Much Unlabeled Data is Really Needed for Effective Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition?
Dhekane, S. G., Haresamudram, H., Thukral, M., & Plötz, T. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 International Symposium on Wearable Computers · doi:10.1145/3594738.3611366 · Cited by 9
Wei, P., Yang, X., Liu, S., Wang, L., & Zheng, B. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Industry Track · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-industry.2 · Cited by 9
Sim-to-Real Transfer for Object Detection in Aerial Inspections of Transmission Towers
Peterlevitz, A. J., Chinelatto, M. A., Menezes, A. G., Motta, C. A. M., Pereira, G. A. B., Lopes, G. L., Souza, G. D. M., Rodrigues, J., Godoy, L. C., Koller, M. A. F. F., et al. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3322374 · Cited by 7
Quality and Relevance Metrics for Selection of Multimodal Pretraining Data
Rao, R., Rao, S., Nouri, E., Dey, D., Celikyilmaz, A., & Dolan, B. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00486 · Cited by 6
SpeechNet: A Universal Modularized Model for Speech Processing Tasks
Chen, Y.-C., Chi, P.-H., Yang, S.-W., Chang, K.-W., Lin, J.-H., Huang, S.-F., Liu, D.-R., Liu, C.-L., Lee, C.-K., & Lee, H.-Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.03070 · Cited by 6
Ahmed, F., & Courville, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5712 · Cited by 5
Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition using Wearables
Haresamudram, H., Essa, I., & Plötz, T. (2022) · arXiv · Cited by 107
Procedural Generalization by Planning with Self-Supervised World Models
Anand, A., Walker, J., Li, Y., Vértes, E., Schrittwieser, J., Ozair, S., Weber, T., & Hamrick, J. B. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.01587 · Cited by 5
Self-citationA Temporal Extension of Latent Dirichlet Allocation for Unsupervised Acoustic Unit Discovery
van der Merwe, W., Kamper, H., & Adam du Preez, J. (2022) · Interspeech 2022 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2022-11369 · Cited by 3
Kuo, P.-C., Hou, H., Dabney, W., & Walker, E. Y. (2025) · arXiv
“In deep learning, predictive learning has been explored as a powerful self-supervised technique to support representation learning and improve task performance [26, 27].”
Spike Hijacking in Late-Interaction Retrieval
Suresh, K., Vatsa, T., King, T., Kadav, A., & Friedrich, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.05253
“Within this setting, we train a small encoder using in-batch InfoNCE [6] and compare three aggregation strategies: MaxSim, Top-𝑘 averaging, and temperature-controlled softmax pooling.”
InfluentialHaresamudram, H., Tang, C. I., Suh, S., Lukowicz, P., & Ploetz, T. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 31
“The original formulation for CPC [136] is motivated by the predictive coding theory in neuroscience in which the brain constantly generates hypotheses and updates the mental model of the environment by comparing the hypotheses with the sensory inputs.”
InfluentialInvestigating Enhancements to Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition
Haresamudram, H., Essa, I., & Ploetz, T. (2022) · arXiv · Cited by 27
“Similar to the original formulation of CPC [37], the enhanced version of CPC learns effective representations by training to distinguish a z-vector (zt+k), that is k timesteps in the future, from a collection of distractor samples drawn from a proposal distribution.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMARs: Multi-view Attention Regularizations for Patch-based Feature Recognition of Space Terrain
Chase, T., & Dantu, K. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.05182 · Cited by 5
Kuo, P.-C., Hou, H., Dabney, W., & Walker, E. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-0945
Metadata
- Authors
- Oord, A. V. D., Li, Y., & Vinyals, O.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1807.03748
- OpenAlex
- W4297808394
- Cited by
- 6,242
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 660 · 2024: 1288 · 2023: 1444 · 2022: 1043 · 2021: 1173 · 2020: 454 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Keywords
- contrastive predictive coding, unsupervised feature learning, autoregressive models, negative sampling, high-dimensional data, speech representation, image representation, text representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
