PreprintCited by 4Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Computational challenges of cell cycle analysis using single cell transcriptomics

Open access
Chervov, Alexander, Zinovyev, Andrei·2022·arXiv

Abstract

The cell cycle is one of the most fundamental biological processes important for understanding normal physiology and various pathologies such as cancer. Single cell RNA sequencing technologies give an opportunity to analyse the cell cycle transcriptome dynamics in an unprecedented range of conditions (cell types and perturbations), with thousands of publicly available datasets. Here we review the main computational tasks in such analysis: 1) identification of cell cycle phases, 2) pseudotime inference, 3) identification and profiling of cell cycle-related genes, 4) removing cell cycle effect, 5) identification and analysis of the G0 (quiescent) cells. We review seventeen software packages that are available today for the cell cycle analysis using scRNA-seq data. Despite huge progress achieved, none of the packages can produce complete and reliable results with respect to all aforementioned tasks. One of the major difficulties for existing packages is distinguishing between two patterns of cell cycle transcriptomic dynamics: normal and characteristic for embryonic stem cells (ESC), with the latter one shared by many cancer cell lines. Moreover, some cell lines are characterized by a mixture of two subpopulations, one following the standard and one ESC-like cell cycle, which makes the analysis even more challenging. In conclusion, we discuss the difficulties of the analysis of cell cycle-related single cell transcriptome and provide certain guidelines for the use of the existing methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2208.05229

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cell cycle effects can cause differences between cells that are due to cell cycle states rather than cell types.

    “scRNA-seq data may contain biological confounding factors such as cell cycle effects, whereby differences between cells might be due to different cell cycle states rather than cell types44.”

    From Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities (2023) · cites this paper as [44]

  • Tricycle performed well for data sets with high cell-type heterogeneity.

    “Tricycle was shown to perform well for data sets with high cell-type heterogeneity44.”

    From Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities (2023) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [22][22] D. Morgan, D. Morgan, The Cell Cycle: Principles of Control, Primers in Biology, OUP/New Science Press, 2007. URL https://books.google.fr/books?id=ScEuiD2V6GoC -
  2. [73][73] W. Stallaert, S. R. Taylor, K. M. Kedziora, M. S. Johnson, C. D. Taylor, H. K. Sobon, C. L. Young, J. C. Limas, J. V. Holloway, J. G. Cook, et al., The molecular architecture of cell cycle arrest, bioRxiv. -
  3. [142][142] G. M. Cooper, R. E. Hausman, R. E. Hausman, The cell: a molecular approach, Vol. 4, ASM press Washington, DC, 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chervov, A., & Zinovyev, A.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4320859098
Cited by
4
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission (826121)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐19, ANR-19-P3IA-0001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
cell cycle analysis, single-cell RNA sequencing, cell cycle genes, cell line heterogeneity, cancer cell lines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review