The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Does Affect Matter in Organizations?
Abstract
Executive Overview Interest in and research about affect in organizations have expanded dramatically in recent years. This article reviews what we know about affect in organizations, focusing on how employees' moods, emotions, and dispositional affect influence critical organizational outcomes such as job performance, decision making, creativity, turnover, prosocial behavior, teamwork, negotiation, and leadership. This review highlights pervasive and consistent effects, showing the importance of affect in shaping a wide variety of organizational behaviors, the knowledge of which is critical for researchers, managers, and employees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990) · Imagination, Cognition and Personality · doi:10.2190/dugg-p24e-52wk-6cdg · Cited by 10,484
The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271 · Cited by 9,916
An argument for basic emotions
Ekman, P. (1992) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 · Cited by 9,646
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803 · Cited by 7,143
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81 · Cited by 6,404
What good are positive emotions?
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300 · Cited by 6,066
Cited by
Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research
Berger, J. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.002 · Cited by 1,469
Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.571 · Cited by 589
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/09534811111132758 · Cited by 547
Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review
Gooty, J., Connelly, S., Griffith, J., & Gupta, A. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.005 · Cited by 471
Tsouloupas, C. N., Carson, R. L., Matthews, R., Grawitch, M. J., & Barber, L. K. (2010) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410903494460 · Cited by 456
Diener, E., Thapa, S., & Tay, L. (2020) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044908 · Cited by 373
Butts, M. M., Becker, W. J., & Boswell, W. R. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0170 · Cited by 353
Barsade, S. G., & Knight, A. P. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111316 · Cited by 309
Self-citationFarh, C. I. C. C., Seo, M.-G., & Tesluk, P. E. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027377 · Cited by 248
The weekend matters: relationships between stress recovery and affective experiences
Fritz, C., Sonnentag, S., Spector, P. E., & McInroe, J. A. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.672 · Cited by 216
It’s about time: New perspectives and insights on time management
Aeon, B., & Aguinis, H. (2017) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0166 · Cited by 197
(2015) · doi:10.1145/2696454.2696460 · Cited by 175
The science of sharing and the sharing of science
Milkman, K. L., & Berger, J. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317511111 · Cited by 154
Emotional intelligence: Sine qua non of leadership or folderol?
Walter, F., Cole, M. S., & Humphrey, R. H. (2011) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.25.1.45 · Cited by 258
Dhanani, L. Y., & LaPalme, M. L. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318816162 · Cited by 115
Kunze, F., & Menges, J. I. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2129 · Cited by 77
Anger and fear in decision-making: The case of film directors on set
Coget, J.-F., Haag, C., & Gibson, D. E. (2011) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2011.06.003 · Cited by 52
Self-citationWhen is unconditional self-acceptance a better predictor of mental health than self-esteem?
Popov, S. (2019) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-018-0310-x · Cited by 43
Barasch, A., Levine, E. E., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.006 · Cited by 43
Mayer, C.-H., & Oosthuizen, R. M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17082829 · Cited by 32
Wei, H., Zhu, Y., & Li, S. (2016) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-016-9463-2 · Cited by 20
Unconditional Self-acceptance: The Silent Hero of Emotional Well-Being.
Popov, S., & Jovanović, T. (2026) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-026-00660-2 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. E.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Perspectives
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-59
- ISSN
- 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4529
- OpenAlex
- W2037284388
- Cited by
- 1,230
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 62.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
