The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Institutional Logics in Organizations: Explaining Their Varied Nature and Implications
Open accessAbstract
Multiple institutional logics present a theoretical puzzle. While scholars recognize their increasing prevalence within organizations, research offers conflicting perspectives on their implications, causing confusion and inhibiting deeper understanding. In response, we propose a framework that delineates types of logic multiplicity within organizations, and we link these types with different outcomes. Our framework categorizes organizations in terms of logic compatibility and logic centrality and explains how field, organizational, and individual factors influence these two dimensions. We illustrate the value of our framework by showing how it helps explain the varied implications of logic multiplicity for internal conflict. By providing insight into the nature and implications of logic multiplicity within organizations, our framework and analysis synthesize the extant literature, offer conceptual clarity, and focus future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While the market-environment dichotomy offers parsimony and clarity, institutional theorists argue that the market and the environment are not mutually exclusive(Besharov & Smith, 2014).”
From Advancing the sustainability agenda through strategic human resource management: Insights and suggestions for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Besharov & Smith, 2014
Citations
Cites
Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes
Oliver, C. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002 · Cited by 8,950
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733
Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840609104803 · Cited by 1,821
Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0157 · Cited by 802
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 85
- Andriopoulos C., 2009, Organization Science, 20, 696, 10.1287/orsc.1080.0406 · DOI · Paper page
- Barley S. R., 1991, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 8, 1
- Battilana J., 2010, Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1419, 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391 · DOI
- Battilana J., Academy of Management Annals
- Battilana J., 2013, Keeping a foot in both camps: Understanding the drivers of social performance in hybrid organizations
- Bechky B. A., 2003, American Journal of Sociology, 109, 720, 10.1086/379527 · DOI
- Besharov M. L., Academy of Management Journal
- Binder A., 2007, Theory and Society, 36, 547, 10.1007/s11186-007-9045-x · DOI
- Creed W. E. D., 2010, Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1336, 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318357 · DOI
- Cyert R. M., 1963, A behavioral theory of the firm
- Dacin M. T., 2011, Organization Science, 22, 1203, 10.1287/orsc.1100.0620 · DOI
- D'Aunno T., 1991, Academy of Management Journal, 34, 636, 10.2307/256409 · DOI
- Delbridge R., 2013, Organization Studies, 34, 927, 10.1177/0170840613483805 · DOI
- DiMaggio P., 1982, Media, Culture and Society, 4, 33, 10.1177/016344378200400104 · DOI
- DiMaggio P., 1997, Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263, 10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263 · DOI · Paper page
- DiMaggio P., 1983, American Sociological Review, 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
- Dunn M. B., 2010, Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 114, 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114 · DOI
- Durand R., 2012, Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1295, 10.5465/amj.2011.0345 · DOI
- Fiss P. C., 2013, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 38, 1, 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0000038005 · DOI
- Freidson E., 1970, Professional dominance: The social structure of medical care
- Friedland R., 1991, The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, 232
- Glynn M. A., 2000, Organization Science, 11, 285, 10.1287/orsc.11.3.285.12496 · DOI
- Glynn M. A., 2005, Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1031, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00531.x · DOI
- Greenwood R., 2010, Organization Science, 21, 521, 10.1287/orsc.1090.0453 · DOI
- Greenwood R., 2011, Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317, 10.1080/19416520.2011.590299 · DOI · Paper page
- Greenwood R., 2006, Academy of Management Journal, 49, 27, 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785498 · DOI
- Hallett T., 2006, Theory and Society, 35, 213, 10.1007/s11186-006-9003-z · DOI
- Haveman H. A., 1997, American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1606, 10.1086/231128 · DOI
- Heimer C. A., 1999, Law & Society Review, 33, 17, 10.2307/3115095 · DOI
- Jarzabkowski P., 2009, Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations, 284, 10.1017/CBO9780511596605.011 · DOI
- Jay J., 2012, Academy of Management Journal, 56, 137, 10.5465/amj.2010.0772 · DOI
- Jones C., 2007, Handbook of career studies, 437, 10.4135/9781412976107.n22 · DOI
- Jones C., 2008, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 1075, 10.1002/job.556 · DOI
- Jones C., 2012, Organization Science, 23, 1523, 10.1287/orsc.1110.0701 · DOI
- Jones C., 2013, Organization Studies, 34, 1099, 10.1177/0170840613492073 · DOI
- Kim T., 2007, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 286, 10.2189/asqu.52.2.286 · DOI
- Kistruck G. M., 2013, Academy of Management Journal, 56, 659, 10.5465/amj.2011.0336 · DOI
- Kostova T., 2008, Academy of Management Review, 33, 994, 10.5465/AMR.2008.34422026 · DOI
- Kraatz M., 2008, Handbook of organizational institutionalism, 243, 10.4135/9781849200387.n10 · DOI
- Lawrence T. B., 2006, Handbook of organization studies, 215, 10.4135/9781848608030.n7 · DOI · Paper page
- Lewis M., 2000, Academy of Management Review, 25, 760, 10.5465/amr.2000.3707712 · DOI
- Lok J., 2010, Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1305, 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57317866 · DOI
- Lounsbury M., 2007, Academy of Management Journal, 50, 289, 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634436 · DOI
- Lounsbury M., 2007, Organization Studies, 28, 993, 10.1177/0170840607078111 · DOI
- March J. G., 1994, Primer on decision making: How decisions happen
- Marquis C., 2007, Academy of Management Journal, 50, 799, 10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279172 · DOI
- Mars M. M., 2009, Journal of Management Inquiry, 18, 4, 10.1177/1056492608328234 · DOI
- McPherson C. M., 2013, Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 165, 10.1177/0001839213486447 · DOI
- Meyer J. W., 1977, American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340, 10.1086/226550 · DOI · Paper page
- Meyer J. W., 1983, Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality
- Murray F., 2010, American Journal of Sociology, 116, 341, 10.1086/653599 · DOI
- Pache A., 2010, Academy of Management Review, 35, 455, 10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368 · DOI
- Pache A., 2013, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39, 3, 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039B014 · DOI
- Pache A., 2013, Academy of Management Journal, 56, 972, 10.5465/amj.2011.0405 · DOI
- Pfeffer J., 1978, The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective
- Porter M. E., 2006, Harvard Business Review, 84, 78
- Pratt M. G., 2000, Academy of Management Review, 25, 18, 10.5465/amr.2000.2791601 · DOI
- Purdy J. M., 2009, Academy of Management Journal, 52, 355, 10.5465/AMJ.2009.37308255 · DOI
- Rao H., 2005, American Sociological Review, 70, 968, 10.1177/000312240507000605 · DOI
- Reay T., 2005, Organization Studies, 26, 351, 10.1177/0170840605050872 · DOI
- Sauder M., 2008, Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 209, 10.2189/asqu.53.2.209 · DOI
- Selznick P., 1949, TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization
- Selznick P., 1957, Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation
- Seo M., 2002, Academy of Management Review, 27, 222, 10.5465/amr.2002.6588004 · DOI
- Sgourev S. V., 2011, Theory and Society, 40, 385, 10.1007/s11186-011-9144-6 · DOI
- Smets M., 2012, Academy of Management Journal, 55, 877, 10.5465/amj.2010.0013 · DOI
- Smith W. K., Academy of Management Journal
- Smith W. K., 2013, Business Ethics Quarterly, 23, 407, 10.5840/beq201323327 · DOI
- Smith W. K., 2011, Academy of Management Review, 36, 381
- Smith W. K., 2005, Organization Science, 16, 522, 10.1287/orsc.1050.0134 · DOI
- Stark D., 1996, American Journal of Sociology, 101, 993, 10.1086/230786 · DOI
- Starr P., 1982, The social transformation of American medicine
- Suddaby R., 2010, Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 14, 10.1177/1056492609347564 · DOI
- Thornton P. H., 2002, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 81, 10.2307/3069286 · DOI
- Thornton P. H., 2004, Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing, 10.1515/9781503619098 · DOI
- Thornton P. H., 2005, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 23, 125, 10.1016/S0733-558X(05)23004-5 · DOI
- Thornton P. H., 1999, American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801, 10.1086/210361 · DOI
- Thornton P. H., 2008, Handbook of organizational institutionalism, 100
- Thornton P. H., 2012, The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001 · DOI
- Townley B., 1997, Organization Studies, 18, 261, 10.1177/017084069701800204 · DOI
- Townley B., 2002, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 163, 10.2307/3069290 · DOI
- Tracey P., 2011, Organization Science, 22, 60, 10.1287/orsc.1090.0522 · DOI
- Wry T., 2011, Status in management and organizations, 155
- Yunus M., 2011, New York Times, A23
- Zilber T. B., 2002, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 234, 10.2307/3069294 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Alternative logics: A Discursive approach to normative and alternative organizing
Jensen, P. R. (2020) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726720904128 · Cited by 19
“Previous literature has explored the links between ILs and Discourses (e.g. Mutch, 2018) and the role of ILs in explaining organizational heterogeneity (e.g. Besharov and Smith, 2014).”
BackgroundPolicy entrepreneurship in developing countries: A systematic review of the literature
Aviram, N. F., Cohen, N., & Beeri, I. (2019) · Public Administration and Development · doi:10.1002/pad.1852 · Cited by 25
del Gesso, C. (2019) · doi:10.5539/ijbm.v15n1p16 · Cited by 19
“However, these enterprises are placed on the boundaries between the private sector, the public sector and the third sector, as SE joins “the commercial and social welfare logics” within an organization (Besharov & Smith, 2014, p. 376; Wry & York, 2017, p. 438).”
BackgroundUnderstanding the interplay of institutional logics and management practices in impact sourcing
Malik, F., & Nicholson, B. (2019) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12254 · Cited by 27
“This research also contributes to the study of institutional logics particularly to the concepts of multiplicity of institutional logics (Besharov & Smith, 2014).”
BackgroundDang, V. T., Nguyen, N., Bu, X.-Z., & Wang, J.-M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11123395 · Cited by 19
“If firms reject this conventional wisdom embedded into the industry and organizational network or if they act outside of the range of acceptability of the industry, then the firms’ legitimacy and reliability are challenged [36,41,45,46].”
BackgroundWilliams, K. L., & Taylor, L. D. (2022) · Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022036596 · Cited by 20
The Choices We Collectively Make: Orchestrating Hybridity to Tackle Grand Challenges
Grabski‐Walls, T., & Ambos, T. C. (2024) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13164 · Cited by 20
Exploring the microfoundations of hybridity: A judgment-based approach
Dorobat, C., McCaffrey, M., & Topan, M. (2024) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2024.106406 · Cited by 18
Doing good while making profits: A typology of business models for social ventures
Cuyper, L. D., Clarysse, B., & Wright, M. (2024) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1502 · Cited by 18
Xiao, S. S., & Yu, T. (2024) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102302 · Cited by 23
Tessitore, S., Corsini, F., & Iraldo, F. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139528 · Cited by 22
Pesterfield, C., & Rogerson, M. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05455-4 · Cited by 21
“However, institutional logics scholars now believe that this has been superseded by the acceptance of institutional and organizational dynamism (Besharov & Smith, 2014; Lounsbury et al., 2021).”
Founding Team Entrepreneurial Experience, External Financing and Social Enterprise Performance
Sahasranamam, S., Lall, S., Nicolopoulou, K., & Shaw, E. (2023) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12726 · Cited by 18
“Finally, we make an empirical contribution to research on institutional logics by testing the theory of complementarity of logics on intrinsic and extrinsic tensions in hybrid organizations (Battilana and Dorado, 2010; Besharov and Smith, 2014).”
InfluentialRautiainen, A. I., Mättö, T., Sippola, K., & Pellinen, J. (2021) · Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-12-2019-4313 · Cited by 28
Bribery in emerging economies: an integration of institutional and non-market position perspective
Lu, J., Choi, S., Jiménez, A., & Bayraktar, S. (2021) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-021-09782-w · Cited by 21
Ambidextrous sustainability, organisational structure and performance in hybrid organisations
Maine, J., Samuelsson, E. F., & Uman, T. (2021) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-12-2019-4338 · Cited by 18
How the Zebra Got its Stripes: Individual Founder Imprinting and Hybrid Social Ventures
Lee, M., & Battilana, J. (2020) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000069007 · Cited by 31
Hannigan, T. R., & Casasnovas, G. (2020) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000068008 · Cited by 21
Diab, A. (2019) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2019.04.005 · Cited by 17
Jin, J., & Horta, H. (2018) · Tertiary Education and Management · doi:10.1080/13583883.2017.1346700 · Cited by 18
Woodside, S. (2017) · doi:10.1108/sej-01-2016-0001 · Cited by 18
Symbiosis across institutional logics in a social enterprise
Maibom, C., & Smith, P. (2016) · Social enterprise journal · doi:10.1108/sej-02-2016-0002 · Cited by 18
Advancing Research on Categories for Institutional Approaches of OrganizationsPreprint
Durand, R., & Boulongne, R. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2836098 · Cited by 18
Inside the “Hybrid” Iron Cage: Political Origins of Hybridization
Kim, T. Y., Shin, D., & Jeong, Y. (2016) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1057 · Cited by 20
The rubber band effect: Managing the stability-change paradox in routines
Rosales, V., Gaim, M., Berti, M., & Cunha, M. P. E. (2022) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101194 · Cited by 22
Gümüşay, A. A., Meyer, R. E., & Höllerer, M. A. (2024) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13061 · Cited by 18
Herold, D. M., & Marzantowicz, Ł. (2024) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-08-2023-0572 · Cited by 26
Carballo, R. (2023) · Journal of Organization Design · doi:10.1007/s41469-023-00156-8 · Cited by 17
A configurational approach to political risks and institutional logics
Fan, D., Su, Y.-Y., & Peng, M. W. (2023) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2023.101088 · Cited by 17
Bohn, S., & Gümüşay, A. A. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13004 · Cited by 16
Faith in the future: On a mission to integrate sustainability into management theory and practice
Martinez, F., Peattie, K., & Vazquez-Brust, D. (2021) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2020.102654 · Cited by 17
Editorial: Themed section on accounting and valuation studies
Millo, Y., Power, M., Robson, K., & Vollmer, H. (2020) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2020.101223 · Cited by 17
Heterogeneity in Organizational Hybridity: A Configurational, Situated, and Dynamic Approach
Besharov, M. H.-P., & Mitzinneck, B. C. (2020) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000069001 · Cited by 34
Self-citationJacobs, C., Kreutzer, K., & Vaara, E. (2020) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2018.0821 · Cited by 17
“…manifest itself in intensive struggles over the nature of organizational identity – surfacing in organizational conflicts that are visible to internal and often external stakeholders (Ashforth & Reingen, 2014; Besharov & Smith, 2014; Glynn, 2000; Golden-Biddle & Rao, 1997; Smith & Besharov, 2019).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBoone, C., & Özcan, S. (2020) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2019.1338 · Cited by 17
Business networks as breeding grounds for entrepreneurial options: organizational implications
Zardini, A., Ricciardi, F., Orlandi, L. B., & Rossignoli, C. (2018) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-018-0317-9 · Cited by 21
“Nevertheless, we still know very little on how different organizational logics, understood as different combinations of multi-level logics, influence an organization’s capacity to resist crises and adapt to an ever-evolving context (Besharov and Smith 2014; Pache and Santos 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialMartin, G., Siebert, S., & Robson, I. (2018) · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1239118 · Cited by 17
“Thus, we can interpret the interview data in terms of HR directors expressing different and, at times, incompatible logics as a response to logic multiplicity in their organizations, different forms of socialization, and internal and external social interactions (Besharov & Smith, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNite, C., & Bopp, T. (2015) · Leadership · doi:10.1177/1742715015605878 · Cited by 16
Examining employment relationship activities in family business research
Ferraro, H. S., & Marrone, J. A. (2016) · doi:10.1108/jfbm-01-2016-0001 · Cited by 17
Deng, W., Liang, Q., Zhang, S. X., & Wang, W. (2023) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-023-09930-4 · Cited by 16
“First, by delineating how the reinforcement of family and market logics can stimulate job creation, our findings advocate for a shift to a legitimacy reinforcement view, reshaping the perspective on legitimacy in entrepreneurship (Besharov & Smith, 2014).”
InfluentialBiggerstaff, L., Campbell, J. T., & Goldie, B. A. (2023) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063231161342 · Cited by 16
“Notably, because institutional environments tend to be pluralistic (Meyer & Rowan, 1977), fi rms and their top executives typically face and embody multiple logics, which manifest at many levels and overlap in various realms of social life (Battilana & Lee, 2014; Besharov & Smith, 2014).”
BackgroundCharacterizing sustainability materiality: ESG materiality determination in technology venturing
To, C. K. M., & Chau, K. P. (2022) · Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1016/j.stae.2022.100024 · Cited by 20
Blended Social Impact Investment Transactions: Why Are They So Complex?
Moran, M., & Ward-Christie, L. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05153-7 · Cited by 16
“Yet, as is the circumstance in both cases, the scarcity of more suitable capital renders all actors and their logics central to the transaction (Besharov & Smith, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialLiu, L., & Zhang, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854319 · Cited by 16
LaCroix, E. (2021) · Journal of Experiential Education · doi:10.1177/10538259211028987 · Cited by 17
“To be sure, this process would suggest that experiential education has attained a level of centrality (Besharov & Smith, 2014) in the institution and should therefore exert influence on the professional logics of those carrying out technical functions at the university.”
BackgroundGuo, G., Hakak, L. T., & Ariss, A. A. (2021) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100706 · Cited by 16
Taking Hybridity for Granted: Institutionalization and Hybrid Identification
Glynn, M. A., Hood, E. A., & Innis, B. D. (2020) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000069003 · Cited by 28
Brière, S., & Auclair, I. (2020) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.07.004 · Cited by 17
Changes in the power balance of institutional logics: Middle managers’ responses
Olsen, T. H., & Solstad, E. (2017) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2017.72 · Cited by 18
“The meeting between diverging institutional logics takes on various forms in different organisations, suggesting that there are several contexts for multiple institutional logics (Besharov & Smith, 2014; Pache & Santos, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialNetworks on the walls: Analyzing “traces” of institutional logics in museums’ permanent exhibitions
Zamora‐Kapoor, A., Godart, F. C., & Zhao, Y. (2019) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101387 · Cited by 17
Práticas não adequadas nos tribunais de contas
Lino, A. F., & de Aquino, A. C. B. (2020) · doi:10.1590/0034-761220190270 · Cited by 16
Brantnell, A., & Baraldi, E. (2020) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2020.02.005 · Cited by 15
Conrath-Hargreaves, A., & Wüstemann, S. (2019) · Abacus. A Journal of Accounting and Business Studies · doi:10.1111/abac.12164 · Cited by 16
Maignan, M., Arnaud, C., & Terrisse, P. C. (2019) · Management International · doi:10.7202/1058166ar · Cited by 16
Høvring, C. M. (2017) · Business Ethics A European Review · doi:10.1111/beer.12160 · Cited by 16
Wang, F.-X., Song, H.-S., Cheng, Y.-Y., Luo, N., Gan, B., Feng, J.-J., & Xie, P.-X. (2016) · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1164223 · Cited by 16
“As a number of scholars have begun to highlight the presence of multiple logics coexisting over extended periods of time (Besharov & Smith, 2014; Dunn & Jones, 2010), greater emphasis should be placed on the converging divergence in having an employment contract against the background of the ECL.”
BackgroundSpivack, A. J., Lahti, T., Burström, T., & Wincent, J. (2025) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106505 · Cited by 15
Benson, R., Hessérus, M., Neff, T., & Sedel, J. (2024) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849251364685 · Cited by 15
Li, H., Chang, Y. W., Wang, X., & Zhang, N. (2024) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1017/mor.2024.39 · Cited by 12
“Previous studies have provided theoretical anticipations for the influences of these two sources on a firm ’ s important strategic decisions when faced with incongruent institutional logics (Besharov & Smith, 2014; Pache & Santos, 2010).”
Organizing logic multiplicity in hybrid organizations: The role of organizational culture
Pinz, A., Englert, B., & Helmig, B. (2024) · Nonprofit Management & Leadership · doi:10.1002/nml.21617 · Cited by 15
“…” ) and compatibility (i.e., “ the extent to which the instantiations of logics imply consistent and reinforcing organizational actions ” ), Besharov and Smith (2014, p. 365) argue that logic multiplicity takes different forms, and each form has different implications for the probability…”
InfluentialMeelen, T., & Schwanen, T. (2023) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103303 · Cited by 21
Activity and Identity: Uncovering Multiple Institutional Logics in the Nonprofit Sector
Ressler, R. W., Fulton, B. R., & Paxton, P. M. (2023) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08997640231164375 · Cited by 16
“Such developments will also advance understanding of the complementary and competitive relationships arising from the operation of multiple logics (Besharov & Smith, 2014; Greenwood et al., 2011).”
BackgroundChallenging Community: Logic or Context?
Mutch, A. (2021) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877211004602 · Cited by 15
“…critiqued, it has entered the mainstream, with a number of articles presenting their list of logics, including community, as having agreed status (Besharov & Smith, 2014; Gümüsay, Smets, & Morris, 2020; Lounsbury & Wang, 2019; York, Vedula, & Lenox, 2018).1 There are a number of problems with…”
BackgroundRediscovering strategic content in ‘strong process’ research on business network innovation
van Fenema, P. C., & Keers, B. (2019) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.005 · Cited by 15
Corporate headquarters in the twenty-first century: an organization design perspective
Kunisch, S., Menz, M., & Collis, D. J. (2020) · Journal of Organization Design · doi:10.1186/s41469-020-00086-9 · Cited by 22
“For example, in today’s complex international environment, many business organizations are exposed to a multiplicity of logics, such as public–private, academic–industrial, or social–commercial (Besharov and Smith 2014).”
BackgroundMukhlısın, M., & Fadzly, M. N. (2020) · Accounting Research Journal · doi:10.1108/arj-03-2020-0059 · Cited by 18
Moving off the Map: How Knowledge of Organizational Operations Empowers and Alienates
Huising, R. (2019) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2018.1277 · Cited by 19
“Awareness and understanding of pluralism (Jay 2013, Pache and Santos 2013, Besharov and Smith 2014) encourage reflection on how other models maywork locally, thus eroding the taken-for-grantednessof local arrangements, possibly prompting central actors to initiate change.”
BackgroundZoellner, D. (2019) · Journal of Vocational Education and Training · doi:10.1080/13636820.2019.1623295 · Cited by 16
Institutional Logics and Their Influence on Enterprise Architecture Adoption
Dang, D. (2019) · Journal of Computational Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2018.1564632 · Cited by 15
Sustainability institutionalisation: A mechanistic approach to control change
George, R. A., Siti‐Nabiha, A. K., & Jalaludin, D. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.095 · Cited by 18
The Upgrade to Hybrid Incubators in China: A Case Study of Tuspark Incubator
Gao, Y.-C., & Hu, Y.-M. (2017) · doi:10.1108/jstpm-05-2017-0021 · Cited by 15
Schraven, D., Hartmann, A., & Dewulf, G. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114562284 · Cited by 15
Peer support and value creation among women entrepreneurs
Lenz, A.-K., Muskat, B., & de Brito, R. P. (2025) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-025-01074-7 · Cited by 14
“These tensions are especially pronounced in environments with limited resources, where competing institutional pressures and the struggle for venture survival shape the strategies and actions of entrepreneurs (Besharov & Smith, 2014).”
Analyzing digital government partnerships: An institutional logics perspective
Gong, Y., & Yang, Y. C. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101987 · Cited by 19
Yang, Y., Yan, J., & Yang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122932 · Cited by 15
Managing institutional complexity in a football organization
Jacobsen, Å. (2023) · Managing Sport and Leisure · doi:10.1080/23750472.2023.2248133 · Cited by 14
“In contrast to studies assuming a constant degree of compatibility (Besharov & Smith, 2014; Greenwood et al., 2010), Carlsson-Wall et al. (2016) suggest that institutional logics are more or less compatible in different situations within an organization.”
‘Take my advice’: Entrepreneurial consumers and the ecosystemic logics of digital platforms
da Fonseca, A. L. A., Chimenti, P. C. P. D. S., & Campos, R. D. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122601 · Cited by 24
Social-Market Hybridity in Social Ventures: Scale Development and Validation
Fu, J. (2023) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/00076503231167569 · Cited by 14
“Centrality describes the degree to which a single institutional logic (low centrality) or multiple logics (high centrality) are core to organizational functioning (Besharov & Smith, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBenner, M. (2022) · Local Economy · doi:10.1177/02690942231172728 · Cited by 14
“…inconsistencies and contradictions between the underlying institutional logics surface (Friedland and Alford, 1991; Suchman, 1995; Thornton and Ocasio, 2008) once the new path has been legitimized and developed, thus moving towards estranged or contested configurations (Besharov and Smith, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialOrganizational Event Stigma: Typology, Processes, and Stickiness
Clark, K., & Li, Y. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05173-3 · Cited by 18
“Considering the co-existence of multiple and even competing institutional logics (Besharov & Smith, 2014; McPherson & Sauder, 2013; Purdy & Gray, 2009) and the ever-changing societal norms and values (Hudson & Okhuysen, 2009), it is even more important to understand which and how stigma judgments…”
BackgroundAccounting practices and hospital professional power dynamics during a crisis
Carr, M., & Beck, M. P. (2022) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2022.101085 · Cited by 14
Preparers’ Construction of Users’ Information Needs in Corporate Reporting: A Case Study
Oberwallner, K., Pelger, C., & Sellhorn, T. (2021) · The European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2021.1961596 · Cited by 14
“In particular, while nested in the broader societal logics, more refined and specific logics typically exist at the (lower) levels of, for example, industries, organizational fields or individual organizations (e.g. Besharov & Smith, 2014; Greenwood et al., 2011).”
BackgroundDestination website management: A social constructionist approach
Kanazawa, F. N., Lourenção, M., de Oliveira, J. H. C., & Giraldi, J. D. M. E. (2021) · doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100545 · Cited by 14
Does institutional logic matter in microfinance delivery? An empirical study of microfinance clients
Atiase, V., Mahmood, S., & Wang, Y. (2019) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-10-2018-0713 · Cited by 14
Managing institutional complexity in a transitional economy
Woldesenbet, K. (2018) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-10-2017-0429 · Cited by 13
Lo, J., & Li, H. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.006 · Cited by 14
“Recently scholars have also noted that it is not uncommon for an organization to face or even embody multiple institutional logics (Besharov and Smith, 2014; Kraatz and Block, 2008), which may result in heterogeneous responses to the same institutional pressure both within and across organizations (Greenwood et al.”
BackgroundRuíz, M. M., Saka‐Helmhout, A., & Carillo, J. (2024) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102382 · Cited by 20
Social Enterprises as Agents of Social Justice: A Rawlsian perspective on institutional capacity
Lechterman, T., & Mair, J. (2024) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/01708406241261435 · Cited by 13
“Organizational theorists have long worried that the blending of disparate goals leads to a clash of institutional logics (Besharov & Smith, 2014; Thornton, Ocasio, & Lounsbury, 2012), resulting in internal conflict (Pache & Santos, 2010), mission drift (Ebrahim, Battilana, & Mair, 2014), or…”
Roth, M., Vakkuri, J., & Johanson, J. (2024) · Journal of Management & Governance · doi:10.1007/s10997-024-09696-x · Cited by 12
“Exploring all interrelationships between the diverse institutional logics of an ecosystem would certainly be useful (c.f. Bat-tilana et al., 2017; Besharov & Smith, 2014), because “when initiatives combine three or more logics… the possibility for differences in priority orderings is greater than…”
The influence of multiple logics on the work of sustainability professionals
Gluch, P., & Hellsvik, S. (2023) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2023.2214252 · Cited by 16
“When institutional logics have been applied to study the implications of logic multiplicity, scholars have found that multiple logics can indeed coexist at the organizational level (Besharov and Smith 2014).”
BackgroundComprehensive INGO Accountability to Strengthen Perceived Program Effectiveness: A Logical Thing?
Hengevoss, A. (2023) · VOLUNTAS - International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-023-00556-0 · Cited by 13
“The institutional logics perspective is not only concerned with the material practices and reasons for which organizations interact, but further seeks to understand the drivers of specific logics as well as their implications for organizational performance (Besharov & Smith, 2014).”
Legitimizing unsustainable practices: The institutional logics of pro‐pesticide organizations
Boiral, O., Brotherton, M., Talbot, D., & Guillaumie, L. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3021 · Cited by 17
New avenues for HRM roles: A systematic literature review on HRM in hybrid organizations
Belte, A. (2021) · German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift für Personalforschung · doi:10.1177/23970022211049533 · Cited by 17
“At the group or individual level, tensions arise over contradictory values, identities, mindsets, or skillsets of employees (Besharov and Smith, 2014; Glynn, 2000).”
BackgroundYang, J. J., Tsui‐Auch, L. S., & Wang, X. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04879-0 · Cited by 17
Mair, J., & Rathert, N. (2020) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x20200000069009 · Cited by 13
Discovering and Managing Interdependence with Customer‐Entrepreneurs
Park, H., Ritala, P., & Velu, C. K. (2020) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12444 · Cited by 12
Chasing two rabbits: how social enterprises as hybrid organizations manage paradoxes
Park, J.-H. (2020) · Asian Business & Management · doi:10.1057/s41291-019-00065-3 · Cited by 13
The past, present, and future of marketing strategy
Sozuer, S., Carpenter, G. S., Kopalle, P. K., McAlister, L., & Lehmann, D. (2020) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-020-09529-5 · Cited by 13
Kraatz, M. S. (2020) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492619899330 · Cited by 13
“It is, of course, true that logics research recognizes the existence of multiple, contradictory logics, and the tensions between these logics have been a major focus in recent years (Besharov & Smith, 2014; Greenwood, Raynard, Kodeih, Micelotta, & Lounsbury, 2011).”
BackgroundProfessionals' use of ICT in hospitals: the interplay between institutional and rational factors
Gastaldi, L., Radaelli, G., Lettieri, E., Luzzini, D., & Mariano Corso, A. (2019) · International Journal of Technology Management · doi:10.1504/ijtm.2019.099768 · Cited by 19
“The institutional theory applies at different levels of analysis, e.g. to explain the agency of firms in the industrial field where they operate, of professional groups in a state; or employees in an organization (Besharov and Smith, 2014; Lawrence et al., 2009; Tolbert and Zucker, 1999).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University
- University of Delaware (US)
- ORCID
- Smith, Wendy K.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 364-381
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W2078862672
- Cited by
- 1,571
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 196 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 198 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 167 · 2021: 133 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 123 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 91.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- udspace.udel.edu
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Library, Museums and Press - UDSpace (University of Delaware) (submittedVersion)
- eCommons (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
- Keywords
- multiple institutional logics, organizational conflict, institutional theory, organizational outcomes, field effect, personal factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review