Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 983

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

From DNA to diversity: molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design

·2002·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Preface.1. A Brief History of Animals.2. The Genetic Toolkit for Development.3. Building Animals.4. Evolution of the Toolkit.5. Diversification of Body Plans and Body Parts.6. Evolution of Morphological Novelties.7. Morphological Variation and Species Divergence.8. From DNA to Diversity: The Primacy of Regulatory Evolution.Glossary.Index

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.39-5182

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
39
Issue
09
Pages
39-5182-39-5182
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2034536549
Cited by
983
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.