Cited by 5,543Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionFlow Experience in Various FieldsHealth, psychology, and well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being

·2011·Choice Reviews Online

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.48-7217

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,019

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2011-08-01
Volume
48
Issue
12
Pages
48-7217-48-7217
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1670606950
Cited by
5,543
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 588 · 2024: 629 · 2023: 655 · 2022: 603 · 2021: 559 · 2020: 486 · 2019: 424 · 2018: 306 · 2017: 288 · 2016: 295 · 2015: 224 · 2014: 212 · 2013: 129 · 2012: 99
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
eudaimonia, happiness, well-being, positive psychology, subjective well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review