Cited by 218Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Homeostatic reinforcement learning for integrating reward collection and physiological stability

Open access
Keramati, Mehdi, Gutkin, Boris·2014·eLife

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Efficient regulation of internal homeostasis and defending it against perturbations requires adaptive behavioral strategies. However, the computational principles mediating the interaction between homeostatic and associative learning processes remain undefined. Here we use a definition of primary rewards, as outcomes fulfilling physiological needs, to build a normative theory showing how learning motivated behaviors may be modulated by internal states. Within this framework, we mathematically prove that seeking rewards is equivalent to the fundamental objective of physiological stability, defining the notion of physiological rationality of behavior. We further suggest a formal basis for temporal discounting of rewards by showing that discounting motivates animals to follow the shortest path in the space of physiological variables toward the desired setpoint. We also explain how animals learn to act predictively to preclude prospective homeostatic challenges, and several other behavioral patterns. Finally, we suggest a computational role for interaction between hypothalamus and the brain reward system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.04811

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current models of decision-making do not incorporate all of the four aspects of homeostatic utility.

    “Current models of decision-making do not incorporate all of these aspects, and first attempts of accounting for homeostasis and allostasis in formal models of decision-making have only surfaced relatively recently (e.g., Keramati and Gutkin, 2014; Penny and Stephan, 2014; Pezzulo et al., 2015).”

    From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Keramati and Gutkin, 2014

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies gaps in earlier homeostatic-regulation models and presents this paper as a formal model integrating homeostasis with reinforcement learning. It does not identify the citing paper’s four aspects of homeostatic utility or establish that current decision-making models omit all four. The Discussion, ‘Limitations and future directions’ (page unavailable), also says this model assumes a fixed setpoint rather than an adaptive one. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • First attempts to account for homeostasis and allostasis in formal models of decision-making have only surfaced relatively recently.

    “Current models of decision-making do not incorporate all of these aspects, and first attempts of accounting for homeostasis and allostasis in formal models of decision-making have only surfaced relatively recently (e.g., Keramati and Gutkin, 2014; Penny and Stephan, 2014; Pezzulo et al., 2015).”

    From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Keramati and Gutkin, 2014

    The Introduction describes a formal model linking homeostatic regulation to reinforcement learning, so this 2014 paper is an example of the kind of recent work cited. But the Discussion (Relationship to other theoretical models) treats allostasis as a distinct approach, and Limitations and future directions says this model assumes a fixed setpoint. It therefore does not fully support presenting this paper as a formal model of both homeostasis and allostasis. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dickinson A Balleine BW 2002 The role of learning in motivation Gallistel CR Volume 3 of Steven's Handbook of experimental psychology: learning, motivation, and Emotion 3rd edition New York Wiley 497 533
  2. Marr D 1982 Vision Cambridge, Massachusetts MIT Press
  3. Sibly RM McFarland DJ 1974 State Space Approach to Motivation, Motivational Control System Analysis Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keramati, M., & Gutkin, B.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Corresponding author
  • Keramati, Mehdi
  • Gutkin, Boris
Venue
eLife
Published
2014-12-02
Volume
3
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142110758
Cited by
218
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  • National Research University Higher School of Economics (Basic Research Program)
  • Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM U960, France)
  • Center for Research and Interdisciplinary (Frontiers du Vivant)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-0087 IEC, France, ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL, France)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
physiological stability, primary reward, normative theory, delay discounting, predictive learning, hypothalamus, brain reward system, adaptive behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Computer Simulation, Conditioning, Psychological, Extinction, Psychological, Homeostasis, Learning, Models, Neurological, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Satiety Response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review