Cited by 396Nuts composition and effectsNutritional Studies and DietCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Nut consumption and decreased risk of sudden cardiac death in the Physicians’ Health Study

Albert, Christine M., Gaziano, J. Michael, Willett, Walter C., Manson, JoAnn E.·2002·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dietary nut intake has been associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease mortality; however, the mechanism is unclear. Since components of nuts may have antiarrhythmic properties, part of the benefit may be due to a reduction in sudden cardiac death. METHODS: We prospectively assessed whether increasing frequency of nut consumption, as ascertained by an abbreviated food frequency questionnaire at 12 months of follow-up, was associated with a lower risk of sudden cardiac death and other coronary heart disease end points among 21 454 male participants enrolled in the US Physicians' Health Study. Participants were followed up for an average of 17 years. RESULTS: Dietary nut intake was associated with a significantly reduced risk of sudden cardiac death after controlling for known cardiac risk factors and other dietary habits (P for trend,.01). Compared with men who rarely or never consumed nuts, those who consumed nuts 2 or more times per week had reduced risks of sudden cardiac death (relative risk, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.92) and total coronary heart disease death (relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.98). In contrast, nut intake was not associated with significantly reduced risks of nonsudden coronary heart disease death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: These prospective data in US male physicians suggest that the inverse association between nut consumption and total coronary heart disease death is primarily due to a reduction in the risk of sudden cardiac death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.162.12.1382

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albert, C. M., Gaziano, J. M., Willett, W. C., & Manson, J. E.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Albert, Christine M.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2002-06-24
Volume
162
Issue
12
Pages
1382
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062740567
Cited by
396
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 28
FWCI
17.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-34595, HL 26490, R01HL034595, K08HL003783, 1-K08-HL-03783)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA040360, CA 34944, CA 40360)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nuts composition and effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
nut consumption, sudden cardiac death, coronary heart disease mortality, myocardial infarction, antiarrhythmic effect, dietary intake, male physicians, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Coronary Disease, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Nuts, Physicians, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk, United States, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Death, Sudden, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review