Cited by 597Nuts composition and effectsNutritional Studies and DietCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Frequent nut consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in women: prospective cohort study

Open access
Hu, Frank B, Stampfer, Meir J, Manson, JoAnn E, Rimm, Eric B, Colditz, Graham A, Rosner, Bernard A, Speizer, Frank E, Hennekens, Charles H +1 more·1998·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between nut consumption and risk of coronary heart disease in a cohort of women from the Nurses' Health Study. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Nurses' Health Study. SUBJECTS: 86 016 women from 34 to 59 years of age without previously diagnosed coronary heart disease, stroke, or cancer at baseline in 1980. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Major coronary heart disease including non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal coronary heart disease. RESULTS: 1255 major coronary disease events (861 cases of non-fatal myocardial infarction and 394 cases of fatal coronary heart disease) occurred during 14 years of follow up. After adjusting for age, smoking, and other known risk factors for coronary heart disease, women who ate more than five units of nuts (one unit equivalent to 1 oz of nuts) a week (frequent consumption) had a significantly lower risk of total coronary heart disease (relative risk 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.89, P for trend=0.0009) than women who never ate nuts or who ate less than one unit a month (rare consumption). The magnitude of risk reduction was similar for both fatal coronary heart disease (0.61, 0.35 to 1.05, P for trend=0.007) and non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.68, 0.47 to 1.00, P for trend=0.04). Further adjustment for intakes of dietary fats, fibre, vegetables, and fruits did not alter these results. The inverse association persisted in subgroups stratified by levels of smoking,use of alcohol, use of multivitamin and vitamin E supplements, body mass index, exercise, and intake of vegetables or fruits. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent nut consumption was associated with a reduced risk of both fatal coronary heart disease and non-fatal myocardial infarction. These data, and those from other epidemiological and clinical studies, support a role for nuts in reducing the risk of coronary heart disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.317.7169.1341

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prospective studies have shown that eating 5 servings of nuts per week is associated with a 40% to 60% decrease in coronary heart disease events.

    “Prospective studies have shown that eating 5 servings of nuts per week is associated with a 40% to 60% decrease in coronary heart disease events (38,39).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sabate J. Does nut consumption protest against ischemic heart disease. Eur J Clin Nutr 1993;47:71-5S.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, F. B., Stampfer, M. J., Manson, J. E., Rimm, E. B., Colditz, G. A., Rosner, B. A., Speizer, F. E., Hennekens, C. H., & Willett, W. C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Hu, Frank B
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-11-14
Volume
317
Issue
7169
Pages
1341-1345
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2162635512
Cited by
597
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 35
FWCI
24.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL24074, HL34594, R01HL034594)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA040356, CA-40356)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK046200, T32DK007703)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nuts composition and effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
nut consumption, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, women, Nurses' Health Study, dietary fat, cardiovascular risk factors, dietary fiber, fruit and vegetable intake
MeSH terms
Adult, Coronary Disease, Diet, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Nuts, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review