Cited by 237Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Calculating utility: preclinical evidence for cost–benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine

Phillips, Paul E. M., Walton, Mark E., Jhou, Thomas C.·2007·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Throughout our lives we constantly assess the costs and benefits of the possible future outcomes of our actions and use this information to guide behavior. There is accumulating evidence that dopamine contributes to a fundamental component of this computation-how rewards are compared with the costs incurred when obtaining them.Objective We review the evidence for dopamine's role in cost-benefit decision making and outline a simple mathematical framework in which to represent the interactions between rewards, costs, behavioral state and dopamine.Conclusions Dopamine's effects on cost-benefit decision making can be modeled using simple utility-function curves. This approach provides a useful framework for modeling existing data and generating experimental hypotheses that can be objectively and quantitatively tested by observing choice behavior without the necessity to account for subjective psychological states such as pleasure or desire. We suggest that dopamine plays a key role in overcoming response costs and enabling high-effort behaviors. A particularly important anatomical site of this action is the core of the nucleus accumbens. Here, dopamine is able to modulate activity originating from the frontal cortical systems that also assess costs and rewards. Internal deprivation states (e.g., hunger and thirst) also help to energize goal-seeking behaviors, probably in part by their rich influence on dopamine, which can in turn modify decision making policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-006-0626-6

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The comparison of apparent risks or costs to possible reward is a computation performed by circuits supporting motivated behavior, critically including the nucleus accumbens and the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system.

    “The comparison of apparent risks or costs to possible reward is a computation performed by circuits supporting motivated behavior, critically including the NAc and the mesocorti-colimbic dopamine system (reviewed in depth elsewhere123-125).”

    From Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety (2015) · cites this paper as [125]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, P. E. M., Walton, M. E., & Jhou, T. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Paul E. M.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2006-11-22
Volume
191
Issue
3
Pages
483-495
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2145982623
Cited by
237
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 25
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01da015916-05)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (5 P01 DA015916-04)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
cost-benefit decision making, mesolimbic dopamine system, nucleus accumbens core, utility functions, effort-based decision making, goal seeking, frontal cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Choice Behavior, Dopamine, Goals, Humans, Limbic System, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Reward, Prefrontal Cortex, Neurotransmitter Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review