Cited by 914Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 3 are not checked yet; 19 of the 43 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Association of Cannabis Use in Adolescence and Risk of Depression, Anxiety, and Suicidality in Young Adulthood

Open access

Abstract

Importance: Cannabis is the most commonly used drug of abuse by adolescents in the world. While the impact of adolescent cannabis use on the development of psychosis has been investigated in depth, little is known about the impact of cannabis use on mood and suicidality in young adulthood. Objective: To provide a summary estimate of the extent to which cannabis use during adolescence is associated with the risk of developing subsequent major depression, anxiety, and suicidal behavior. Data Sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Proquest Dissertations and Theses were searched from inception to January 2017. Study Selection: Longitudinal and prospective studies, assessing cannabis use in adolescents younger than 18 years (at least 1 assessment point) and then ascertaining development of depression in young adulthood (age 18 to 32 years) were selected, and odds ratios (OR) adjusted for the presence of baseline depression and/or anxiety and/or suicidality were extracted. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Study quality was assessed using the Research Triangle Institute item bank on risk of bias and precision of observational studies. Two reviewers conducted all review stages independently. Selected data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The studies assessing cannabis use and depression at different points from adolescence to young adulthood and reporting the corresponding OR were included. In the studies selected, depression was diagnosed according to the third or fourth editions of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or by using scales with predetermined cutoff points. Results: After screening 3142 articles, 269 articles were selected for full-text review, 35 were selected for further review, and 11 studies comprising 23 317 individuals were included in the quantitative analysis. The OR of developing depression for cannabis users in young adulthood compared with nonusers was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.16-1.62; I2 = 0%). The pooled OR for anxiety was not statistically significant: 1.18 (95% CI, 0.84-1.67; I2 = 42%). The pooled OR for suicidal ideation was 1.50 (95% CI, 1.11-2.03; I2 = 0%), and for suicidal attempt was 3.46 (95% CI, 1.53-7.84, I2 = 61.3%). Conclusions and Relevance: Although individual-level risk remains moderate to low and results from this study should be confirmed in future adequately powered prospective studies, the high prevalence of adolescents consuming cannabis generates a large number of young people who could develop depression and suicidality attributable to cannabis. This is an important public health problem and concern, which should be properly addressed by health care policy.

Verified 2026-10-11 · 3 references not checked yet

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4500

Cites

83 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

19 of 43 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 31 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 23
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 25
41 of 41
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The association between adolescent cannabis use and young adult depression is causal, for the purpose of estimating population attributable risk.

    “In this study, the estimated population attributable risk is 7.2%.”
    “This translates to some 413 326 young adult cases of depression potentially attributable to cannabis exposure”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 24 nonpoolable longitudinal studies' positive correlations are comparable enough to the pooled results to reinforce them.

    “Interestingly, most of these studies reported a positive correlation between adolescent cannabis use and later depression, 15,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]40,42,43,[49][50][51][52][53]61 reinforcing the results of the meta-analysis.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Self-reported questionnaires accurately classify adolescent cannabis use in the included studies.

    “Cannabis use in most studies was measured with a selfreported questionnaire.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The diagnostic tools and scales used in included studies validly identify depression, anxiety, and suicidality.

    “Depression or anxiety was considered in a dichotomous manner according to the third and fourth editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 62 criteria or with scales (eg, Symptom Checklist-90, Composite International Diagnostic Interview, General Health Questionnaire-12, Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised) with a determined cutoff points (eTable 1 in the Supplement).”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Adolescent suicide attempts are included despite the stated adult-outcome scope

    Major

    The methods place suicide attempts in early adulthood, but the pooled analysis includes attempts measured within adolescence.

  • Thirty-five studies are called meta-analysis studies although only eleven were pooled

    Minor

    One passage says 35 studies were retained for the meta-analysis; the results say only 11 met its inclusion criteria, and another passage explicitly excludes 24 of the 35 from it.

  • Adolescent suicidal ideation is included despite the stated adult-outcome scope

    Minor

    The methods place all four measured outcomes in early adulthood, but the suicidal-ideation analysis includes outcomes measured within adolescence.

  • The cited DSM edition differs from the editions named in the methods

    Minor

    The methods specify the third and fourth DSM editions while citing reference 62, which lists the fifth edition.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Johnston, 2013, OMP, Bachman J, Schulenberg J. Monitoring the Future National Results on Drug Use: 2012 Overview
  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2011, 2010 National Drug Strategy Household Survey Report
  3. 2018, European Drug Report 2018: Trends and Developments
  4. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2013, Grey Matters: a Practical Search Tool for Evidence-Based Medicine
  5. Vespa, 2017, The Changing Economics and Demographics of Young Adulthood: 1975-2016
  6. BriereFN. Association Entre Consommation de Drogues Illicites et Symptomatologie Dépressive à l’Adolescence. Une Étude Longitudinale Auprès de Jeunes Québécois Fréquentant l’École Secondaire en Milieu Défavorisé [PhD thesis]. Montreal, Canada: Université de Montréal; 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 914

Metadata

Authors
Gobbi, G., Atkin, T., Zytynski, T., Wang, S., Askari, S., Boruff, J., Ware, M., Marmorstein, N., Cipriani, A., Dendukuri, N., & Mayo, N.
Affiliations
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Gobbi, Gabriella
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
426
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912112705
Cited by
914
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 140 · 2024: 127 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 42
FWCI
12.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-2017-08-ST2-006)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
adolescent cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, early adulthood, mental health outcomes, risk of bias, mood disorders, substance use and mental health, psychosis risk, longitudinal cohort, risk of bias assessment
MeSH terms
Marijuana Use, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Age Factors, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Suicide, Attempted, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review