The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining Object Location and Object Recognition Memory in Mice
Abstract
This unit is designed to provide sufficient instruction for the setup and execution of tests for object location and object recognition in adult mice. This task is ideally suited for the study of a variety of mouse models that examine disease mechanisms and novel therapeutic targets. By altering several key parameters, the experimenter can investigate short‐term or long‐term memory and look for either memory impairments or enhancements. Object location and object recognition memory tasks rely on a rodent's innate preference for novelty, and can be conducted sequentially in the same cohort of animals. These two tasks avoid the inherent stress induced with other common measures of rodent memory such as fear conditioning and the Morris water maze. This protocol covers detailed instructions on conducting both tasks, as well as key points concerning data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci . 69:8.31.1‐8.31.17. © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mice that accumulated less than 10 s of total exploration time across both objects during the training session were excluded from subsequent analyses.
“Mice that accumulated less than 10 s of total exploration time across both objects during the training session were excluded from subsequent analyses53.”
From MT1-MMP inhibition rejuvenates ageing brain and rescues cognitive deficits in obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: behavioral data
Ennaceur, A., & Delacour, J. (1988) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(88)90157-x · Cited by 3,223
Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: memory for objects, places, and contexts
Mumby, D. G., Gaskin, S., Glenn, M. J., Schramek, T. E., & Lehmann, H. (2002) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.41302 · Cited by 714
Haettig, J., Stefanko, D. P., Multani, M. L., Figueroa, D. X., McQuown, S. C., & Wood, M. A. (2011) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.1986911 · Cited by 211
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1093/cercor/bhj114 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/lm.1028008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/npp.2011.61 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/lm.97605 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2004.00109.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0166-4328(98)00079-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.12.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/lm.026385.112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5052-10.2011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00367-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.09.013 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5717-09.2010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/lm.422607 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0903964106 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn.3359 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3827-04.2005 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1346-04.2004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.04.004 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Witcher, K. G., Bray, C. E., Chunchai, T., Zhao, F., O'Neil, S. M., Gordillo, A. J., Campbell, W. A., McKim, D. B., Liu, X., Dziabis, J. E., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2469-20.2020 · Cited by 387
Peixoto, L., Risso, D., Poplawski, S. G., Wimmer, M. E., Speed, T. P., Wood, M. A., & Abel, T. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv736 · Cited by 105
Self-citationHippocampal activation of Rac1 regulates the forgetting of object recognition memory
Liu, Y., Du, S., Lv, L., Lei, B., Shi, W., Tang, Y., Wang, L., & Zhong, Y. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.056 · Cited by 114
Stoppel, L. J., Kazdoba, T. M., Schaffler, M. D., Preza, A. R., Heynen, A., Crawley, J. N., & Bear, M. F. (2018) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2017.236 · Cited by 92
Yang, M., Lewis, F. C., Sarvi, M. S., Foley, G. M., & Crawley, J. N. (2015) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.039602.115 · Cited by 70
Stellate cells in the medial entorhinal cortex are required for spatial learning
Tennant, S. A., Fischer, L., Garden, D. L. F., Gerlei, K. Z., Martinez-Gonzalez, C., McClure, C., Wood, E. R., & Nolan, M. F. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.005 · Cited by 71
Hippocampal release of dopamine and norepinephrine encodes novel contextual information
Moreno‐Castilla, P., Pérez‐Ortega, R., Violante‐Soria, V., Balderas, I., & Bermúdez‐Rattoni, F. (2017) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22711 · Cited by 67
Yang, M., Lewis, F., Foley, G., & Crawley, J. N. (2015) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.04.023 · Cited by 28
Lyman, K. A., Han, Y., Zhou, C., Renteria, I., Besing, G.-L., Kurz, J. E., & Chetkovich, D. M. (2021) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abl4580 · Cited by 17
Nasehi, M., Rostam-Nezhad, E., Ebrahimi-Ghiri, M., & Zarrindast, M.-R. (2017) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.059 · Cited by 10
Tang, Y.-F., Duan, Y.-J., Ge, R.-D., Lu, X., Gao, B.-Y., Guo, J.-W., & Jiang, S. (2022) · Journal of Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.31083/j.jin2201005 · Cited by 5
MT1-MMP inhibition rejuvenates ageing brain and rescues cognitive deficits in obesity
Asthana, P., Li, L., Lu, L., Wu, J., Zhang, S., Li, N., Wong, S. K. K., Gurung, S., Zhang, Y., Lin, Y., et al. (2025) · Cell Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41421-025-00825-w · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogel‐Ciernia, A., & Wood, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine California
- Venue
- Current Protocols in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1934-8584
- 1934-8576
- PMC
- PMC4219523
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review