Cited by 805Extraction and Separation ProcessesBattery Modeling and ManagementRecycling and Waste Management Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 270 of the 270 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries—Current State of the Art, Circular Economy, and Next Generation Recycling

Open access
Neumann, Jonas, Petranikova, Martina, Meeus, Marcel, Gamarra, Jorge D., Younesi, Reza, Winter, Martin, Nowak, Sascha·2022·Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract

Abstract Being successfully introduced into the market only 30 years ago, lithium‐ion batteries have become state‐of‐the‐art power sources for portable electronic devices and the most promising candidate for energy storage in stationary or electric vehicle applications. This widespread use in a multitude of industrial and private applications leads to the need for recycling and reutilization of their constituent components. Improving the “recycling technology” of lithium ion batteries is a continuous effort and recycling is far from maturity today. The complexity of lithium ion batteries with varying active and inactive material chemistries interferes with the desire to establish one robust recycling procedure for all kinds of lithium ion batteries. Therefore, the current state of the art needs to be analyzed, improved, and adapted for the coming cell chemistries and components. This paper provides an overview of regulations and new battery directive demands. It covers current practices in material collection, sorting, transportation, handling, and recycling. Future generations of batteries will further increase the diversity of cell chemistry and components. Therefore, this paper presents predictions related to the challenges of future battery recycling with regard to battery materials and chemical composition, and discusses future approaches to battery recycling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.202102917

Cites

270 of 270 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Aaboud M., 2016, J. High Energy Phys., 761, 158
  2. Coffin D., 2018, J. Int. Commer. Econ., 1
  3. Bleicher S., 1996, Environment Reporter, 27
  4. Laws of New York chapter 562 2010.
  5. E.Directive Directive 2008/98/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 19 november 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives. Official Journal of the European Union L 2008 312.
  6. Espinosa D. C. R., 2019, Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (weee) Handbook (second edition), 371, 10.1016/B978-0-08-102158-3.00014-8 · DOI
  7. Torabian M. M., 2021, Waste Manage. Res.
  8. Petrániková M., 2011, Acta Metallurgica Slovaca, 17, 106
  9. Muzayanha S. U., 2019, Metals, 4, 10
  10. Melin H. E., 2019, State‐of‐the‐Art in Reuse and Recycling of Lithium‐Ion Batteries, a Research Review
  11. N.Vieceli G.Lombardo Burçak Ebin M.Petranikova in12th Int. Conf. on Process Hydrometallurgy Gecamin Digital Publications Santiago Chile2020.
  12. Ma Y., 2021, Rare Metal Technology, 3
  13. Keller A., 2021, Chem. Eng. Process.: Process Intensif., 108552
  14. Chauhan S., 2014, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 3, 1575
  15. 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.023 · DOI
  16. Peng C., 2019, J. Miner., 72, 790
  17. Van Osch D. J., 2020, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 8, 10591
  18. Elwert T., 2012, World Metall.–Erzmet., 65, 163
  19. 10.1016/j.supflu.2014.07.014 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/cssc.201500920 · DOI
  21. Mauler L., 2021, Energy Environ. Sci.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 805

Metadata

Authors
Neumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Chalmers University of Technology Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Industrial Material Recycling Kemivägen 4 Gothenburg 41296 Sweden
  • European Materials Industrial Research Initiative‐ EMIRI Rue de Ransbeek 310 Brussels B‐1120 Belgium
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Corresponding author
Nowak, Sascha
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-10
Volume
12
Issue
17
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W4205771230
Cited by
805
References
270
Citations by year
2026: 147 · 2025: 205 · 2024: 216 · 2023: 187 · 2022: 50
FWCI
62.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Energy Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (957213, HORIZON2020)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (957213, 03XP0246C, 03XP0253A)
  • Energimyndigheten
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Keywords
lithium-ion battery recycling, circular economy, battery materials recovery, electric vehicle batteries, stationary energy storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review