Cited by 205Primate Behavior and EcologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Tolerant food sharing and reciprocity is precluded by despotism among bonobos but not chimpanzees

Open access
Jaeggi, Adrian V., Stevens, Jeroen M.G., Van Schaik, Carel P.·2010·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Tolerant food sharing among human foragers can largely be explained by reciprocity. In contrast, food sharing among chimpanzees and bonobos may not always reflect reciprocity, which could be explained by different dominance styles: in egalitarian societies reciprocity is expressed freely, while in more despotic groups dominants may hinder reciprocity. We tested the degree of reciprocity and the influence of dominance on food sharing among chimpanzees and bonobos in two captive groups. First, we found that chimpanzees shared more frequently, more tolerantly, and more actively than bonobos. Second, among chimpanzees, food received was the best predictor of food shared, indicating reciprocal exchange, whereas among bonobos transfers were mostly unidirectional. Third, chimpanzees had a shallower and less linear dominance hierarchy, indicating that they were less despotic than bonobos. This suggests that the tolerant and reciprocal sharing found in chimpanzees, but not bonobos, was made possible by the absence of despotism. To investigate this further, we tested the relationship between despotism and reciprocity in grooming using data from an additional five groups and five different study periods on the main groups. The results showed that i) all chimpanzee groups were less despotic and groomed more reciprocally than bonobo groups, and ii) there was a general negative correlation between despotism and grooming reciprocity across species. This indicates that an egalitarian hierarchy may be more common in chimpanzees, at least in captivity, thus fostering reciprocal exchange. We conclude that a shallow dominance hierarchy was a necessary precondition for the evolution of human‐like reciprocal food sharing. Am J Phys Anthropol 143:41–51, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.21288

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaeggi, A. V., Stevens, J. M. G., & Van Schaik, C. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp (BE)
Corresponding author
Jaeggi, Adrian V.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-16
Volume
143
Issue
1
Pages
41-51
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W2082643407
Cited by
205
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Cogito Foundation
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
food sharing, reciprocity, despotism, dominance hierarchy, bonobos, chimpanzees, grooming, egalitarianism, primate social behavior, evolution of cooperation
MeSH terms
Animals, Pan troglodytes, Cooperative Behavior, Feeding Behavior, Female, Male, Monte Carlo Method, Social Behavior, Social Dominance, Pan paniscus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review