The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method
Abstract
A person deciding on a career, a wife, or a place to live bases his choice on two factors: (1) How much do I like each of the available alternatives? and (2) What are the chances for a successful outcome of each alternative? These two factors comprise the utility of each outcome for the person making the choice. This notion of utility is fundamental to most current theories of decision behavior. According to the expected utility hypothesis, if we could know the utility function of a person, we could predict his choice from among any set of actions or objects. But the utility function of a given subject is almost impossible to measure directly. To circumvent this difficulty, stochastic models of choice behavior have been formulated which do not predict the subject's choices but make statements about the probabilities that the subject will choose a given action. This paper reports an experiment to measure utility and to test one stochastic model of choice behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity
Camerer, C., & Weber, M. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122575 · Cited by 1,795
Frontal cortex and reward-guided learning and decision-making
Rushworth, M. F. S., Noonan, M. P., Boorman, E. D., Walton, M. E., & Behrens, T. E. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.014 · Cited by 1,111
The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love
Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.002 · Cited by 1,049
Heart Strings and Purse Strings: Carryover Effects of Emotions on Economic Decisions
Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00679.x · Cited by 959
Orbitofrontal Cortex Encodes Willingness to Pay in Everyday Economic Transactions
Plassmann, H., O'Doherty, J., & Rangel, A. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2131-07.2007 · Cited by 855
The welfare effects of social media
Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20190658 · Cited by 857
Hare, T. A., O'Doherty, J., Camerer, C. F., Schultz, W., & Rangel, A. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1309-08.2008 · Cited by 792
The neural basis of metacognitive ability
Fleming, S. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0417 · Cited by 747
“used to elicit item values in behavioural economics [36].”
MethodChib, V. S., Rangel, A., Shimojo, S., & O'Doherty, J. P. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2575-09.2009 · Cited by 643
Confidence in value-based choice
De Martino, B., Fleming, S. M., Garrett, N., & Dolan, R. J. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3279 · Cited by 534
Shu, S. B., & Peck, J. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.002 · Cited by 418
Neural representations of subjective reward value
Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2010) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.031 · Cited by 405
Plassmann, H., O'Doherty, J. P., & Rangel, A. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0788-10.2010 · Cited by 356
Do Investors Care about Impact?
Heeb, F., Kölbel, J. F., Paetzold, F., & Zeisberger, S. (2023) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhac066 · Cited by 332
One Swallow Doesn't Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects
Maniadis, Z., Tufano, F., & List, J. A. (2014) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.104.1.277 · Cited by 280
When Do Losses Loom Larger than Gains?
Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.42.2.134.62283 · Cited by 267
Hutcherson, C. A., Plassmann, H., Gross, J. J., & Rangel, A. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6387-11.2012 · Cited by 227
Schwardmann, P., & van der Weele, J. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0666-7 · Cited by 215
Microfoundations of Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility
Shea, C. T., & Hawn, O. V. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0795 · Cited by 209
McFadden, J. R., & Huffman, W. E. (2017) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.02.007 · Cited by 202
The Neurobiology of Reference-Dependent Value Computation
De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Holt, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4832-08.2009 · Cited by 174
Changing value through cued approach: an automatic mechanism of behavior change
Schonberg, T., Bakkour, A., Hover, A. M., Mumford, J. A., Nagar, L., Perez, J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3673 · Cited by 161
Grewal, L., Stephen, A. T., & Coleman, N. V. (2019) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243718821960 · Cited by 151
Automatic versus Choice-Dependent Value Representations in the Human Brain
Grueschow, M., Polania, R., Hare, T. A., & Ruff, C. C. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.054 · Cited by 130
Ericson, K. M., & Laibson, D. (2019) · Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 1 · doi:10.1016/bs.hesbe.2018.12.001 · Cited by 125
Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value
Sepulveda, P., Usher, M., Davies, N., Benson, A. A., Ortoleva, P., & De Martino, B. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.60705 · Cited by 121
Dopamine, Prediction Error and Beyond
Diederen, K. M. J., & Fletcher, P. C. (2021) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858420907591 · Cited by 106
A scarcity mindset alters neural processing underlying consumer decision making
Huijsmans, I., Ma, I., Micheli, L., Civai, C., Stallen, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1818572116 · Cited by 103
Towards a value theory for personal data
Spiekermann, S., & Korunovska, J. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2016.4 · Cited by 99
Marette, S., Roosen, J., Blanchemanche, S., & Feinblatt-Mélèze, E. (2010) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.04.009 · Cited by 89
The Welfare Effects of Social Media
Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2019) · doi:10.3386/w25514 · Cited by 81
Confidence measurement in the light of signal detection theory
Massoni, S., Gajdos, T., & Vergnaud, J.-C. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01455 · Cited by 58
The Neural Basis of Metacognitive Ability
Fleming, S. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2014) · The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45190-4_11 · Cited by 50
Eliciting willingness to pay for fairtrade products with information
Ruggeri, G., Corsi, S., & Nayga, R. M. (2021) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104066 · Cited by 49
OK computer: Worker perceptions of algorithmic recruitment
Fumagalli, E., Rezaei, S., & Salomons, A. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104420 · Cited by 46
Bulley, A., Lempert, K. M., Conwell, C., Irish, M., & Schacter, D. L. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B · doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0338 · Cited by 33
The Economic Consequences of Increasing Sleep Among the Urban Poor
Bessone, P., Rao, G., Schilbach, F., Schofield, H., & Toma, M. (2020) · doi:10.3386/w26746 · Cited by 26
Performance evaluation and creativity: Balancing originality and usefulness
Ostermaier, A., & Uhl, M. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2020.101552 · Cited by 16
The Anterior Insula Processes a Time-Resolved Subjective Risk Prediction Error
Kim, J.-C., Hellrung, L., Nebe, S., & Tobler, P. N. (2025) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2302-24.2025 · Cited by 12
Transaction Frame Determines Preferences: Valuation of Labor by Employee and Contractor
Ritov, I., & Schurr, A. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620916521 · Cited by 8
Neural Representation of Valenced and Generic Probability and Uncertainty
Kim, J.-C., Hellrung, L., Grueschow, M., Nebe, S., Nagy, Z., & Tobler, P. N. (2024) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0195-24.2024 · Cited by 5
Creation and validation of a NOVA scored picture set to evaluate ultra-processed foods.
Hutelin, Z., Ahrens, M., Baugh, M. E., Oster, M. E., Hanlon, A. L., & DiFeliceantonio, A. G. (2024) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107358 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, G. M., Degroot, M. H., & Marschak, J.
- Venue
- Behavioral Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1964
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 226-232
- ISSN
- 1092-7026 (ISSN-L)
- 0005-7940
- 1099-1743
- OpenAlex
- W2029350946
- Cited by
- 2,640
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
