Cited by 780Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Point and 5‐year period prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia: the Cache County Study

Open access
Steinberg, Martin, Shao, Huibo, Zandi, Peter, Lyketsos, Constantine G., Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A., Norton, Maria C., Breitner, John C.S., Steffens, David C., Tschanz, JoAnn T.·2008·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms are nearly universal in dementia, yet little is known about their longitudinal course in the community. Objective: To estimate point and 5‐year period prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in an incident sample of 408 dementia participants from the Cache County Study. Methods: The Neuropsychiatric Inventory assessed symptoms at baseline and at 1.5 years, 3.0 years, 4.1 years, and 5.3 years. Point prevalence, period prevalence and mean symptom severity at each time point were estimated. Results: Point prevalence for delusions was 18% at baseline and 34–38% during the last three visits; hallucinations, 10% at baseline and 19–24% subsequently; agitation/aggression fluctuated between 13% and 24%; depression 29% at baseline and 41–47% subsequently; apathy increased from 20% at baseline to 51% at 5.3 years; elation never rose above 1%; anxiety 14% at baseline and 24–32% subsequently; disinhibition fluctuated between 2% and 15%; irritability between 17% and 27%; aberrant motor behavior gradually increased from 7% at baseline to 29% at 5.3 years. Point prevalence for any symptom was 56% at baseline and 76–87% subsequently. Five‐year period prevalence was greatest for depression (77%), apathy (71%), and anxiety (62%); lowest for elation (6%), and disinhibition (31%). Ninety‐seven percent experienced at least one symptom. Symptom severity was consistently highest for apathy. Conclusions: Participants were most likely to develop depression, apathy, or anxiety, and least likely to develop elation or disinhibition. Give converging evidence that syndromal definitions may more accurately capture neuropsychiatric co‐morbidity in dementia, future efforts to validate such syndromes are warranted. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.1858

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agitation is common, persistent, difficult to treat, costly, and associated with severe adverse consequences for patients and caregivers.

    “Agitation is common, persistent, difficult to treat, costly, and associated with severe adverse consequences for patients and caregivers1–5.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1159/000067972 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/gps.1316 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1212/WNL.53.2.321 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1159/000017113 · DOI
  5. 10.1017/S1041610201007517 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199711)12:11<1074::AID-GPS696>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  7. 10.1097/00019442-200002000-00004 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb07245.x · DOI
  9. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.5.708 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/gps.448 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/gps.440 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/gps.1203 · DOI
  13. Morris J, 1994, Clinical Dementia Rating Scale
  14. 10.1097/00019442-200203000-00003 · DOI
  15. Rabins PV, 1999, Practical Dementia Care
  16. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.09.031 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/00019442-200506000-00005 · DOI
  18. 10.1176/ajp.147.8.1049 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.15.3.340 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/gps.1025 · DOI
  21. 10.1001/jama.293.18.2211-b · DOI
  22. 10.1017/S1041610205001523 · DOI
  23. 10.1176/ajp.152.9.1349 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Steinberg, M., Shao, H., Zandi, P., Lyketsos, C. G., Welsh‐Bohmer, K. A., Norton, M. C., Breitner, J. C. S., Steffens, D. C., & Tschanz, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Utah State University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Steinberg, Martin
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
170-177
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2139214514
Cited by
780
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 38
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG011380, R01AG021136)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Keywords
neuropsychiatric symptoms, dementia, prevalence, delusions, hallucinations, agitation, depression, apathy, anxiety, elation, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor behavior, symptom severity, longitudinal course
MeSH terms
Aged, Anxiety, Delusions, Dementia, Depression, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Irritable Mood, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Psychomotor Agitation, Incidence, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review